Abstract
This paper presents results from three years of studying human-robot interaction in the context of the AAAI Robot Rescue Competition. We discuss our study methodology, the competitors’ systems and performance, and suggest ways to improve human-robot interaction in urban search and rescue (USAR) as well as other remote robot operations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
Two additional teams entered as demonstrations only in 2002.
We also studied the Robot Rescue Competitions at RoboCup 2003 and RoboCup 2004. In this paper, we focus on the AAAI competitions.
Team F entered in 2002, but did not make the finals, so we discuss 2003 only.
Team G entered in 2002 as a demonstration only, so that year is not discussed.
Team J also entered in 2002 and 2003, but did not make the finals those years, so we discuss 2004 only.
References
Drury, J.L., Scholtz, J., and Yanco, H.A. 2003. Awareness in human-robot interactions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Washington, DC.
Endsley, M.R. 1988. Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA.
Endsley, M.R. 1987. SAGAT: A Methodology for the Measurement of Situation Awareness (NOR DOC 87-83). Northrup, Hawthorne, CA.
Engelmore, R., and Morgan, A. (eds.) 1986. Blackboard Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Ericsson, K.A. and Simon, H.A. 1980. Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87:215–251.
Jacoff, A., Messina, E., and Evans, J. 2001. A reference test course for autonomous mobile robots. In Proceedings of the SPIE-AeroSense Conference, Orlando, FL.
Jacoff, A., Messina, E., and Evans, J. 2000. A standard test course for urban search and rescue robots. In Proceedings of the Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop, August.
Kieras, D.E. 1988. Towards a practical GOMS model methodology for user interface design. In M. Helander (ed.), The Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 135–157.
Leveson, N.G. 1986. Software safety: why, what and how. ACM Computing Surveys, 18:125–162.
Scholtz, J. 2002. Evaluation methods for human-system performance of intelligent systems. In Proceedings of the 2002 Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems (PerMIS) Workshop.
Yanco, H.A. and Drury, J. 2004. ‘Where am I?’ Acquiring situation awareness using a remote robot platform. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, October.
Yanco, H.A., Drury, J.L., and Scholtz, J. 2004. Beyond usability evaluation: Analysis of human-robot interaction at a major robotics competition. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1–2):117–149.
Acknowledgments
This work is sponsored in part by the National Science Foundation (IIS-0415224, IIS-0308186) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Our thanks to all of the participating teams and those who assisted with the data collection, particularly Jean Scholtz (NIST), Brian Antonishek (NIST), Jeff Young (NIST), Elena Messina (NIST), Adam Jacoff (NIST), Brian Weiss (NIST), Mike Baker (UML), Bobby Casey (UML), Brenden Keyes (UML), and Phil Thoren (UML).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yanco, H.A., Drury, J.L. Rescuing interfaces: A multi-year study of human-robot interaction at the AAAI Robot Rescue Competition. Auton Robot 22, 333–352 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-006-9016-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-006-9016-5