Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safe and effective navigation of autonomous robots in hazardous environments

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of autonomous mobile machines to perform useful tasks in real work environments is currently being impeded by concerns over effectiveness, commercial viability and, above all, safety. This paper introduces a case study of a robotic excavator to explore a series of issues around system development, navigation in unstructured environments, autonomous decision making and changing the behaviour of autonomous machines to suit the prevailing demands of users. The adoption of the Real-Time Control Systems (RCS) architecture (Albus, 1991) is proposed as a universal framework for the development of intelligent systems. In addition it is explained how the use of Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDP) (Kaelbling et al., 1998) can form the basis of decision making in the face of uncertainty and how the technique can be effectively incorporated into the RCS architecture. Particular emphasis is placed on ensuring that the resulting behaviour is both task effective and adequately safe, and it is recognised that these two objectives may be in opposition and that the desired relative balance between them may change. The concept of an autonomous system having “values” is introduced through the use of utility theory. Limited simulation results of experiments are reported which demonstrate that these techniques can create intelligent systems capable of modifying their behaviour to exhibit either ‘safety conscious’ or ‘task achieving’ personalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Albus, J.S. 1991. Outline for a theory of intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 21(3): 473–509.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Albus, J.S. and Meystel, A.M. 2001. Engineering of Mind: An Introduction to the Science of Intelligent Systems. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkin, R.C. 1993. Survivable robotic systems: Reactive and homeostatic control. In: M. Jamshidi and P.J. Eicket (Eds.), Robotics and Remote Systems for Hazardous Environments. Prentice Hall, pp. 135–154.

  • Arkin, R.C. 1998. Behaviour-Based Robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. 1789. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation from Utilitarianism, Fontana, 1973.

  • Gaskill, S.P. and Went, S.R.G. 1996. Safety Issues in Modern Applications of Robots reliability. Engineering and System Safety, 53:301–307.

  • Geske, D.M. 2004. The Future is Still in the Future for Autonomous Haul Trucks. Diesel & Gas Turbine Publications, Gale Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghu, J., Seward, D.W., and Taylor, C.J. 2004. The automation of bucket position for theintelligent excavator LUCIE using the Proportional-Integral-Plus (PIP) control strategy. Journal of Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 19:16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, M.J. 1999. The Foundations of Causal Decision Theory. Cambridge studies in probability, Induction, and Decision Theory. ISBN 0-521-64164-0.

  • Kaelbling, L.P., Littman, M.L., and Cassandra, A.R. 1998. Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial Intelligence, 101:99–134.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • National Advanced Robotics Research Centre, 1992. Safety and Standards for Advanced Robots—A First Exposition.

  • Pace, C. 2004. Autonomous safety management for mobile robots. Lancaster University, PhD Thesis.

  • Seward, D.W., Ward, J., Findlay, J., and Kinniburgh, H. 1996. The automation of piling rig positioning using satellite GPS. 13th International Symposium on Robotics in Construction, Tokyo pp. 223–230.

  • Seward, D.W., Pace, C., Morrey, R., and Sommerville, I. 2000. Safety analysis of autonomous excavator functionality. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 70:29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seward, D.W., Quayle, S.D., Zied, K., and Pace, C. 2002. Data interpretation from leuze rotoscan sensor for robot localisation and environment mapping. 19th International Symposium on Robotics in Construction, Washington, USA, pp 343–348.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek Seward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seward, D., Pace, C. & Agate, R. Safe and effective navigation of autonomous robots in hazardous environments. Auton Robot 22, 223–242 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-006-9721-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-006-9721-0

Keywords