Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Compositional model checking of software product lines using variation point obligations

  • Published:
Automated Software Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces a technique for incremental and compositional model checking that allows efficient reuse of model-checking results associated with the features in a product line. As the use of product lines has increased, so has the need to verify the models used to construct the products in the product line. However, this effort is currently hampered by the difficulty of composing model-checking results for the features in a way that allows reuse for subsequent products. The contributions of this paper are to remove restrictions on how the features can be sequentially composed, to describe how to generate obligations such that all sequentially composed systems can be verified, and to show how to compositionally model check the product in the product line by reusing the variation-point obligations. The paper develops the technique and its implementation in the context of a medical-device product line.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abadi, M., Lamport, L.: Conjoining specifications. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 17(3), 507–535 (1995). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/203095.201069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S., Ramakrishnan, C.R.: Compositional analysis for verification of parameterized systems. Theor. Comput. Sci. 354(2), 211–229 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2005.11.016

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Batory, D., Benavides, D., Ruiz-Cortes, A.: Automated analysis of feature models: challenges ahead. Commun. ACM 49(12), 45–47 (2006). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1183236.1183264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berezin, S., Campos, S., Clarke, E.M.: Compositional reasoning in model checking. In: Proc. COMPOS, pp. 81–102. Springer, Berlin (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, C., Fisler, K., Krishnamurthi, S., Hentenryck, P.V.: A constraint-based approach to open feature verification. Tech. Rep. CS-03-07, Department of Computer Science, Brown University (2003)

  • Blundell, C., Fisler, K., Krishnamurthi, S., Hentenryck, P.V.: Parameterized interfaces for open system verification of product lines. In: ASE ’04: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 258–267. IEEE Comput. Soc., Washington (2004). 10.1109/ASE.2004.53

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, G., Godefroid, P.: Model checking partial state spaces with 3-valued temporal logics. In: CAV ’99: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, pp. 274–287. Springer, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, E.M., Emerson, E.A., Sistla, A.P.: Automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 8(2), 244–263 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, E.M., Long, D.E., McMillan, K.L.: Compositional model checking. In: LICS, pp. 353–362 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Classen, A., Heymans, P., Schobbens, P.Y., Legay, A., Raskin, J.F.: Model checking lots of systems: efficient verification of temporal properties in software product lines. In: ICSE ’10: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 335–344. ACM, New York (2010). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1806799.1806850

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cleaveland, R.: Tableau-based model checking in the propositional mu-calculus. Acta Inform. 27(8), 725–748 (1990). citeseer.ist.psu.edu/61863.html

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenbogen, K.A., Wood, M.A.: Cardiac Pacing and ICDs, 4th edn. Blackwell, Oxford (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fantechi, A., Gnesi, S.: A behavioural model for product families. In: ESEC-FSE ’07: Proceedings of the 6th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 521–524. ACM, New York (2007). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1287624.1287700

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, D., Uchitel, S., Braberman, V.: A foundation for behavioural conformance in software product line architectures. In: ROSATEA ’06: Proceedings of the ISSTA 2006 Workshop on Role of Software Architecture for Testing and Analysis, pp. 39–48. ACM, New York (2006). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1147249.1147254

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fisler, K., Krishnamurthi, S.: Modular verification of collaboration-based software designs. In: ESEC/FSE-9: Proceedings of the 8th European Software Engineering Conference Held Jointly with 9th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 152–163. ACM, New York (2001). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/503209.503231

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fisler, K., Krishnamurthi, S.: Modular verification of feature-oriented software models. Tech. Rep. WPI-CS-TR-02-28, Department of Computer Science, WPI (2002). http://web.cs.wpi.edu/kfisler/Pubs/tr-02-28.pdf

  • Gheorghiu, M., Giannakopoulou, D., Pasareanu, C.S.: Refining interface alphabets for compositional verification. In: TACAS, pp. 292–307 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakopoulou, D., Pasareanu, C.S., Barringer, H.: Assumption generation for software component verification. In: ASE ’02: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 3–12. IEEE Comput. Soc., Washington (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gruler, A., Leucker, M., Scheidemann, K.: Modeling and model checking software product lines. In: FMOODS ’08: Proceedings of the 10th IFIP WG 6.1 International Conference on Formal Methods for Open Object-Based Distributed Systems, pp. 113–131. Springer, Berlin (2008). 10.1007/978-3-540-68863-1_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.: Feature interactions in electronic mail. In: Feature Interactions in Telecommunications Systems, pp. 67–82. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelund, K., Lowry, M.R., Penix, J.: Formal analysis of a space-craft controller using SPIN. Softw. Eng. 27(8), 1000–9999 (2001). citeseer.ist.psu.edu/havelund98formal.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Huth, M., Ryan, M.: Logic in Computer Science: Modelling and Reasoning about Systems, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004). http://pubs.doc.ic.ac.uk/logic-computer-science-second/

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, I., Griss, M., Jonsson, P.: Software Reuse: Architecture, Process and Organization for Business Success. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaivola, R.: Formal verification of Pentium 4 components with symbolic simulation and inductive invariants. In: Etessami, K., Rajamani, S.K. (eds.) CAV. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3576, pp. 170–184. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, K.C., Cohen, S.G., Hess, J.A., Novak, W.E., Peterson, A.S.: Feature-oriented domain analysis (foda) feasibility study. Tech. rep., Carnegie-Mellon University Software Engineering Institute (1990)

  • Kang, K.C., Lee, J., Donohoe, P.: Feature-oriented product line engineering. IEEE Softw. 19(4), 58–65 (2002). http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MS.2002.1020288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishi, T., Noda, N., Katayama, T.: Design verification for product line development. In: SPLC, pp. 150–161 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthi, S., Fisler, K.: Foundations of incremental aspect model-checking. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 16(2), 7 (2007). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1217295.1217296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, K.G., Nyman, U., Wasowski, A.: Modal i/o automata for interface and product line theories. In: ESOP’07: Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Programming, pp. 64–79. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauenroth, K., Pohl, K.: Towards automated consistency checks of product line requirements specifications. In: ASE ’07: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 373–376. ACM, New York (2007). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1321631.1321687

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Krishnamurthi, S., Fisler, K.: Verifying cross-cutting features as open systems. In: SIGSOFT ’02/FSE-10: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 89–98. ACM, New York (2002a). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/587051.587066

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H.C., Krishnamurthi, S., Fisler, K.: Interfaces for modular feature verification. In: ASE ’02: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, p. 195. IEEE Comput. Soc., Washington (2002b)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H.C., Krishnamurthi, S., Fisler, K.: Modular verification of open features using three-valued model checking. Autom. Softw. Eng. 12(3), 349–382 (2005). 10.1007/s10515-005-2643-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlewood, B., Strigini, L.: Validation of ultrahigh dependability for software-based systems. Commun. ACM 36(11), 69–80 (1993). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/163359.163373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J.: Research prototype model checker for compositional model checking of software product lines (2010). http://www.cs.iastate.edu/~janetlj/PrototypeModelChecker/

  • Liu, J., Dehlinger, J., Lutz, R.: Safety analysis of software product lines using state-based modeling. J. Syst. Softw. 80(11), 1879–1892 (2007a). 10.1016/j.jss.2007.01.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Dehlinger, J., Sun, H., Lutz, R.: State-based modeling to support the evolution and maintenance of safety-critical software product lines. In: ECBS ’07: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshops on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, pp. 596–608. IEEE Comput. Soc., Washington (2007b). 10.1109/ECBS.2007.66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Hauptman, M., Lutz, R., Geppert, B., Rossler, F.: A tool-supported technique for specification & management of model-checking properties for software product lines. Tech. Rep. 08-05, Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University (2008). http://archives.cs.iastate.edu

  • Nejati, S., Sabetzadeh, M., Chechik, M., Uchitel, S., Zave, P.: Towards compositional synthesis of evolving systems. In: International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (2008). http://publicaciones.dc.uba.ar/Publications/2008/NSCUZ08

    Google Scholar 

  • Ossher, H., Tarr, P.: Multi-dimensional separation of concerns and the hyperspace approach. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Software Architectures and Component Technology: The State of the Art in Software Development. Kluwer Academic, Norwell (2000). citeseer.ist.psu.edu/ossher00multidimensional.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Springer, New York (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Queille, J., Sifakis, J.: Specification and verification of concurrent systems in Cesar. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium in Programming (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Szyperski, C.: Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thang, N.T.: Incremental verification of consistency in feature-oriented software. PhD Thesis, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (2005)

  • Wang, X.: A modular model checking algorithm for cyclic feature compositions. Master’s Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2005)

  • Webber, D.L., Gomaa, H.: Modeling variability in software product lines with the variation point model. Sci. Comput. Program. 53(3), 305–331 (2004). 10.1016/j.scico.2003.04.004

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D.M., Lai, R.: Software Product Line Engineering: A Family-Based Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, F., Browne, J.C.: Verified systems by composition from verified components. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 28(5), 277–286 (2003). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/949952.940109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zave, P.: Feature interactions and formal specifications in telecommunications. Computer 26(8), 20–29 (1993). 10.1109/2.223539

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rockwell Collins, Inc., Cedar Rapids, IA, USA

    Jing Liu

  2. Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA

    Samik Basu & Robyn R. Lutz

  3. Jet Propulsion Laboratory/Caltech, Pasadena, CA, USA

    Robyn R. Lutz

Authors
  1. Jing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samik Basu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robyn R. Lutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, J., Basu, S. & Lutz, R.R. Compositional model checking of software product lines using variation point obligations. Autom Softw Eng 18, 39–76 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-010-0075-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-010-0075-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation