Abstract
Software defect prediction helps to optimize testing resources allocation by identifying defect-prone modules prior to testing. Most existing models build their prediction capability based on a set of historical data, presumably from the same or similar project settings as those under prediction. However, such historical data is not always available in practice. One potential way of predicting defects in projects without historical data is to learn predictors from data of other projects. This paper investigates defect predictions in the cross-project context focusing on the selection of training data. We conduct three large-scale experiments on 34 data sets obtained from 10 open source projects. Major conclusions from our experiments include: (1) in the best cases, training data from other projects can provide better prediction results than training data from the same project; (2) the prediction results obtained using training data from other projects meet our criteria for acceptance on the average level, defects in 18 out of 34 cases were predicted at a Recall greater than 70% and a Precision greater than 50%; (3) results of cross-project defect predictions are related with the distributional characteristics of data sets which are valuable for training data selection. We further propose an approach to automatically select suitable training data for projects without historical data. Prediction results provided by the training data selected by using our approach are comparable with those provided by training data from the same project.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Boetticher, G., Menzies, T., Ostrand, T.J.: PROMISE repository of empirical software engineering data. http://promisedata.org/repository (2007). Accessed 12 December 2010
Carvalho, A.B., Pozo, A., Vergilio, S.R.: A symbolic fault-prediction model based on multiobjective particle swarm optimization. J. Syst. Softw. 83(5), 7346–7354 (2010)
Catal, C., Diri, B.: A systematic review of software fault prediction studies. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(4), 7346–7354 (2009)
Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C.F.: A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 20(6), 476–493 (1994)
D’Ambros, M., Lanza, M., Robbes, R.: An extensive comparison of bug prediction approaches. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pp. 31–41 (2010)
Fenton, N., Ohlsson, N.: Quantitative analysis of faults and failures in a complex software system. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 26(8), 797–814 (2000)
Hassan, A.E., Holt, R.C.: The top ten list: dynamic fault prediction. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, pp. 263–272 (2005)
Hulse, J.V., Khoshgoftaar, T.: Knowledge discovery from imbalanced and noisy data. Data Knowl. Eng. 68(12), 1513–1542 (2009)
Jiang, Y., Cukic, B., Ma, Y.: Techniques for evaluating fault prediction models. Empir. Softw. Eng. 13(15), 561–595 (2008)
Jureczko, M., Madeyski, L.: Towards identifying software project clusters with regard to defect prediction. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, pp. 1–10 (2010)
Jureczko, M., Spinellis, D.: Using object-oriented design metrics to predict software defects. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Dependability of Computer Systems, pp. 69–81 (2010)
Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Seliya, N., Drown, D.J.: Evolutionary data analysis for the class imbalance problem. Intell. Data Anal. 14(1), 69–88 (2010)
Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Zhong, S., Joshi, V.: Enhancing software quality estimation using ensemble-classifier based noise filtering. Intell. Data Anal. 9(1), 3–27 (2005)
Kocaquneli, E., Gay, G., Menzies, T., Yang, Y., Keung, J.W.: When to use data from other projects for effort estimation. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 321–324 (2010)
Koru, A.G., Liu, H.: Building effective defect-prediction models in practice. IEEE Softw. 22(6), 23–29 (2005)
Lessmann, S., Baesens, B., Mues, C., Pietsch, S.: Benchmarking classification models for software defect prediction: a proposed framework and novel findings. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 34(4), 485–496 (2008)
Li, Q., Yang, Y., Li, M., Wang, Q., Boehm, B.W., Hu, C.: Improving software testing process: feature prioritization to make winners of success-critical stakeholders. J. Softw. Maint. Evol.: Res. Pract. (2010, published online)
Menzies, T., Dekhtyar, A., Distefano, J., Greenwald, J.: Problems with precision: a response to “Comments on ‘Data mining static code attributes to learn defect predictors’ ”. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 33(9), 637–640 (2007a)
Menzies, T., Greenwald, J., Frank, A.: Data mining static code attributes to learn defect predictors. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 33(1), 2–13 (2007b)
Menzies, T., Turhan, B., Benser, A., Gay, G., Cukic, B., Jiang, Y.: Implications of ceiling effects in defect predictors. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, pp. 47–54 (2008)
Menzies, T., Milton, Z., Turhan, B., Cukic, B., Jiang, Y., Bener, A.: Defect prediction from static code features: current results, limitations, new approaches. Autom. Softw. Eng. 17(4), 375–407 (2010)
Moser, R., Pedrycz, W., Succi, G.: A comparative analysis of the efficiency of change metrics and static code attributes for defect prediction. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 181–190 (2008)
Nagappan, N., Ball, T.: Use of relative code churn measures to predict system defect density. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 284–292 (2005)
Nagappan, N., Ball, T., Zeller, A.: Mining metrics to predict component failures. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 452–461 (2006)
Ohlsson, N., Alberg, H.: Predicting fault-prone software modules in telephone switches. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 22(12), 886–894 (1996)
Ostrand, T.J., Weyuker, E.J., Bell, R.M.: Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 31(4), 340–355 (2005)
Quinlan, J.R.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1993)
Shepped, M., Ince, D.: A critique of three metrics. J. Syst. Softw. 26(3), 197–210 (1994)
Tosun, A., Turhan, B., Bener, A.: Practical considerations in deploying AI for defect prediction: a case study within the Turkish telecommunication industry. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Predictor Models in Software Engineering, pp. 1–9 (2009)
Tosun, A., Bener, A., Kale, R.: AI-based software defect predictors: applications and benefits in a case study. In: Proceedings of the 22th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, pp. 1748–1755 (2010)
Turhan, B., Menzies, T., Bener, A.: On the relative value of cross-company and within_company data for defect prediction. Empir. Softw. Eng. 14(5), 540–578 (2009)
Turhan, B., Bener, A., Menzies, T.: Regularities in learning defect predictors. In: The 11th International Conference on Product Focused Software Development and Process Improvement, pp. 116–130 (2010)
Vapnik, V.: Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1998)
Wahyudin, D., Ramler, D., Biffl, S.: A framework for defect prediction in specific software project contexts. In: The 3rd IFIP Central and East European Conference on Software Engineering Techniques (2008)
Watanabe, S., Kaiya, H., Kaijiri, K.: Adapting a fault prediction model to allow inter language reuse. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, pp. 19–24 (2008)
Weyuker, E.J., Ostrand, T.J.: What can fault prediction do for you? Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 4966, 18–29 (2008)
Weyuker, E.J., Ostrand, T.J., Bell, R.M.: Do too many cooks spoil the broth? Using the number of developers to enhance defect prediction models. Empir. Softw. Eng. 13(5), 539–559 (2008)
Weyuker, E.J., Ostrand, T.J., Bell, R.M.: Comparing the effectiveness of several modeling methods for fault prediction. Empir. Softw. Eng. 15(3), 277–295 (2009)
Zhang, H., Zhang, X.: Comments on “Data mining static code attributes to learn defect predictors”. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 33(9), 635–637 (2007)
Zimmermann, T., Nagappan, N., Gall, H.: Cross-project defect prediction: a large scale experiment on data vs. domain vs. process. In: Proceedings of the 7th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on The Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 91–100 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
He, Z., Shu, F., Yang, Y. et al. An investigation on the feasibility of cross-project defect prediction. Autom Softw Eng 19, 167–199 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-011-0090-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-011-0090-3