Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

The design and evaluation of a tool to support software designers at the whiteboard

  • Published:
Automated Software Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the availability of advanced software design tools, software developers are known to frequently turn to the whiteboard when faced with a specific design problem. Free from any restrictions, they engage in an informal form of software design that relies heavily on sketching. However, whereas whiteboards afford flexibility and fluidity, they at the same time limit a designer in only being able to draw and erase content. This paper presents Calico, a novel software design tool that leverages electronic whiteboards to enhance the design experience with explicit support for the creative, exploratory aspects of design. Specifically, Calico offers a grid to partition the drawing space, scraps to organize and manipulate the content, and a reusable palette together with gesture-based input to address several natural behaviors exhibited by software designers, including frequent shifts in focus, use of low-detail models, use of a variety of notations, and a tendency to refine representations. To evaluate Calico, we performed a laboratory experiment involving the design of an educational traffic simulator. Through a three-pronged analysis examining the use of Calico’s features, design behaviors exhibited by the participants, and the nature of the design conversations, we show how Calico benefits the design process as it takes place at the whiteboard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Baker, A.: Bringing software to design: theoretical and empirical studies of software’s role as a design discipline. Ph.D. thesis (2010)

  • Ball, L., Onarheim, B., Christensen, B.: Design requirements, epistemic uncertainty and solution development strategies in software design. Des. Stud. 31(6), 567–589 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bederson, B., Grosjean, J., Meyer, J.: Toolkit design for interactive structured graphics. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 30, 535–546 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, F.P. Jr.: No silver bullet essence and accidents of software engineering. Computer 20, 10–19 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, F.P.: The Design of Design: Essays from a Computer Scientist, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, W.: Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Q., Grundy, J.C., Hosking, J.G.: Sumlow: early design-stage sketching of uml diagrams on an e-whiteboard. Softw. Pract. Exp. 38, 961–994 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini, M., Venolia, G., DeLine, R., Ko, A.J.: Let’s go to the whiteboard: how and why software developers use drawings. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’07, pp. 557–566. ACM Press, New York (2007). doi:10.1145/1240624.1240714

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, R., Mirica, P., Plimmer, B.: Inkkit: A Generic Design Tool for the Tablet pc, pp. 29–30. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Damm, C., Hansen, K., Thomsen, M., Tyrsted, M.: Supporting Several Levels of Restriction in the Uml, pp. 396–409. Springer, Berlin (2000a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Damm, C.H., Hansen, K.M., Thomsen, M.: Tool support for cooperative object-oriented design: gesture based modelling on an electronic whiteboard. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’00, pp. 518–525. ACM Press, New York (2000b). doi:10.1145/332040.332488

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dekel, U., Herbsleb, J.D.: Notation and representation in collaborative object-oriented design: an observational study. ACM SIGPLAN Not. 42(10), 261–280 (2007), 1297047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, E.: Engineering and the Mind’s Eye. Cambridge, London (1992)

  • Goel, V.: Sketches of Thought. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, G.: The dialectics of sketching. Creat. Res. J. 4(2), 123–143 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grisham, P., Iida, H., Perry, D.: Improving design intent research for software maintenance. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Accountability and Traceability in Global Software Engineering, pp. 13–14 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, J., Hosking, J.: Supporting generic sketching-based input of diagrams in a domain-specific visual language meta-tool. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 282–291 (2007), 1248861

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimbretière, F.: Fluid interaction for high resolution wall-size displays. Ph.D. thesis (2002)

  • Hailpern, J., Hinterbichler, E., Leppert, C., Cook, D., Bailey, B.: Team Storm: Demonstrating an Interaction Model for Working with Multiple Ideas During Creative Group Work, pp. 193–202. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, D.: Sketching with conceptual metaphors to explain computational processes. In: Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, pp. 95–102. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J., Landay, J.: Satin: A Toolkit for Informal Ink-based Applications, pp. 63–72. ACM Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Gross, M.D., Hong, J., Do, E.Y.L.: Computational support for sketching in design: a review. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2(1), 1–93 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J.: Design Methods. J. Wiley, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju, W., Lee, B., Klemmer, S.: Range: Exploring Implicit Interaction Through Electronic Whiteboard Design, pp. 17–26. ACM Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemmer, S.R., Newman, M.W., Farrell, R., Bilezikjian, M., Landay, J.A.: The designers’ outpost: a tangible interface for collaborative web site. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST’01, pp. 1–10. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, A.: Translucent patches—dissolving windows. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 121–130 (1994), 192474

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Landay, J.: Silk: Sketching Interfaces Like Krazy, p. 399. ACM Press, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J., Simon, H.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cogn. Sci. 11(1), 65–100 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B.: Design in Mind. Butterworth Architecture, Stoneham (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangano, N., Baker, A., Dempsey, M., Navarro, E., van der Hoek, A.: Software design sketching with calico. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE ’10, pp. 23–32. ACM Press, New York (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mangano, N., van der Hoek, A.: A tool for distributed software design collaboration. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW ’12. ACM Press, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, T.P.: Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use. L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, B., Park, S., Nakano, Y., Mueller, G., Ko, A.: How designers design and program interactive behaviors. In: IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, 2008, VL/HCC 2008, p. 177–184. IEEE Press, New York (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mynatt, E., Igarashi, T., Edwards, W., LaMarca, A.: Flatland: New Dimensions in Office Whiteboards, p. 353. ACM Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., Simon, H., Science, C.M.U.P.P.D.O.C.: Human Problem Solving, vol. 104. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M.W., Lin, J., Hong, J.I., Landay, J.A.: Denim: an informal web site design tool inspired by observations of practice. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 18, 259–324 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, J., Corter, J., Tversky, B., Zahner, D., Rho, Y.: The spatial nature of thought: understanding systems design through diagrams. In: Proceedings ICIS 2008, p. 216 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, G., Olson, J., Carter, M., Storrosten, M.: Small group design meetings: an analysis of collaboration. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7(4), 347–374 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, G., Olson, J., Storrøsten, M., Carter, M., Herbsleb, J., Rueter, H.: The structure of activity during design meetings. In: Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques and Use, pp. 217–240 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J., Olson, G., Storrøsten, M., Carter, M.: Groupwork close up: a comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor. ACM Trans. Inf. Sys. 11(4), 321–348 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ossher, H., John, B., Desmond, M., Bellamy, R.: Are flexible modeling tools applicable to software design discussions? Technical Paper, RC24949, pp. 1–13 (2010). http://domino.research.ibm.com/library/cyberdig.nsf/papers/3D2652F041D95A71852576EA004C67A5

    Google Scholar 

  • Ossher, H., van der Hoek, A., Storey, M.A., Grundy, J., Bellamy, R., Petre, M.: Workshop on flexible modeling tools (flexitools 2011). In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE ’11, pp. 1192–1193. ACM Press, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, E.R., McCall, K., Moran, T.P., Halasz, F.G.: Tivoli: an electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. In: Proceedings of the INTERACT ’93 and CHI ’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’93, pp. 391–398. ACM Press, New York (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Petre, M.: Team coordination through externalized mental imagery. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 61(2), 205–218 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petre, M.: Insights from expert software design practice. In: Proceedings of the 7th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC/FSE ’09 pp. 233–242. ACM Press, New York (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Petre, M., van der Hoek, A., Baker, A.: Studying professional software designers 2010: introduction to the special issue. Des. Stud. (2010)

  • Plimmer, B., Apperley, M.: Computer-aided sketching to capture preliminary design. In: Proceedings of the Third Australasian Conference on User Interfaces, pp. 9–12 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plimmer, B., Grundy, J.: Beautifying sketching-based design tool content: issues and experiences. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Conference on User Interface, AUIC ’05, vol. 40, pp. 31–38. Australian Computer Society, Darlinghurst (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L.: Procedural messages and small group work climates: a lag sequential analysis. Commun. Yearbook 5, 331 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutze, M., Sachse, P., Römer, A.: Support value of sketching in the design process. Res. Eng. Des. 14(2), 89–97 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, F., Marshall, C.: Formality considered harmful: experiences, emerging themes, and directions on the use of formal representations in interactive systems. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 8(4), 333–352 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefik, M.: Wysiwis revised: early experiences with multiuser interfaces. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 5(2), 147–167 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streitz, N.A., Geißler, J., Haake, J.M., Hol, J.: Dolphin: integrated meeting support across local and remote desktop environments and liveboards. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW’94, pp. 345–358. ACM Press, New York (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Suwa, M., Gero, J., Purcell, T.: Unexpected discoveries and s-invention of design requirements: important vehicles for a design process. Des. Stud. 21(6), 539–567 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B.: What do sketches say about thinking? In: Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Sketch Understanding, pp. 148–151 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Virzi, R.A., Sokolov, J.L., Karis, D.: Usability problem identification using both low- and high-fidelity prototypes (1996)

  • Wong, Y.Y.: Rough and ready prototypes: lessons from graphic design (1992)

  • Yamamoto, Y., Nakakoji, K.: Interaction design of tools for fostering creativity in the early stages of information design. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 63, 513–535 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yatani, K., Chung, E., Jensen, C., Truong, K.N.: Understanding how and why open source contributors use diagrams in the development of ubuntu. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 995–1004. ACM Press, New York (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zannier, C., Maurer, F.: Comparing decision making in agile and non-agile software organizations. In: Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partially supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers DUE-0920777 and CCF-1118052. We thank Hitachi for donating three FX-Duo Starboard interactive whiteboards.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697-3440, USA

    Nicolas Mangano & André van der Hoek

Authors
  1. Nicolas Mangano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. André van der Hoek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Mangano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mangano, N., van der Hoek, A. The design and evaluation of a tool to support software designers at the whiteboard. Autom Softw Eng 19, 381–421 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-012-0104-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-012-0104-9

Keywords