Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping discovery modeling and its empirical research for the scientific and technological knowledge concept in unified concept space

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For heterogeneous scientific and technical knowledge organization systems (HSTKOSs), computer-aided concept mapping discovery becomes very difficult among HSTKOSs. First, this paper puts forward and establishes a common data model (CDM) oriented to the HSTKOS used for the standardized description of scientific and technological knowledge concepts. Then, in the mapping discovery algorithm, the algorithms to discover the relations of inheritance, “is a characteristic of”, “is a part of”, relevance and other partial ordering relations between heterogeneous concepts are put forward and designed through mapping transfer. Finally, the empirical results show that in public concept space, the mapping discovery algorithm, put forward and designed by this paper, is feasible and can have certain practical significance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adali, S., Emery, R.: A uniform framework for integrating knowledge in heterogeneous knowledge systems. In: IEEE Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering, pp. 513–520 (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Teraoka, T.: Organization and exploration of heterogeneous personal data collected in daily life. Hum.-Cent. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2(1), 1–15 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Technical Report of Knowledge System Laboratory, 513–520 (1993)

  4. Wiederhold, G.: Mediators in the architecture of future information systems. Computer 25(3), 38–49 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adali, S., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Amalgamating knowledge bases II: distributed mediators. Int. J. ntell. Coop. Inf. Syst. 3(04), 349–383 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Omid, M., Mohammad, R., Akbarzadeh, T.: A novel learning algorithm based on a multi-agent structure for solving multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem. J. Converg. 4(1), 47–52 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, B., Youn, C., Park, Y., Lee, Y., Choi, W.: An adaptive workflow scheduling scheme based on an estimated data processing rate for next generation sequencing in cloud computing. J. Inf. Process. Syst. 8(4), 555–566 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yen, N.Y., Kuo, S.Y.: An integrated approach for Internet resources mining and searching. J. Converg. 3, 37–44 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pan, R., Xu, G., Fu, B., Dolog, P., Wang, Z., Leginus, M.: Improving recommendations by the clustering of tag neighbours. J. Converg. 3(1) (2012)

  10. Hsueh, H.Y., Chen, C.N., Huang, K.F.: Generating metadata from web documents: a systematic approach. Hum.-Cent. Comput. Inf. Sci. 3(1), 1–17 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liang, A.C., Salokhe, G., Sini, M., Keizer, J.: Towards an infrastructure for semantic applications: methodologies for semantic integration of heterogeneous resources. Cat. Classif. Q. 43(3–4), 161–189 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cilia, M., Antollini, M., Bornhovd, C., Buchmann, A.: Dealing with heterogeneous data in pub/sub systems. The concept-based approach, pp. 26–31 (2004)

  13. Valencio, C.R., Oyama, F.T., Neto, P.S., Colombini, A.C., Cansian, A.M., de Souza, R.C.G., Correa, P.L.P.: MR-Radix: a multi-relational data mining algorithm. Hum.-Cent. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2(1), 1–17 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kosovac, B., Froese, T., Vanier, D.: Integrating heterogeneous data representations in model-based AEC/FM systems. Constr. Inf. Technol. 2, 556–567 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Castano, S., De Antonellis, V.: Global viewing of heterogeneous data sources. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 13(2), 277–297 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reddy, M.P., Prasad, B.E., Reddy, P.G., Gupta, A.: A methodology for integration of heterogeneous databases. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 6(6), 920–933 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hudon, M.: Multilingual thesaurus construction: integrating the views of different cultures in one gateway to knowledge and concepts. Inf. Serv. Use 17(2–3), 111–123 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leizeng, M., Maichan, L.: Trends and issues in establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 55(5), 377–395 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Whitehead, C.: Mapping LCSH into thesauri: the AAT model. In: Petersen, T., Molholt, P. (eds.) Beyond the Book: Extending MARC for Subject Access, p. 81. G.H. Hall, Boston (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mayr, P., Petras, V.: Cross-concordances: terminology mapping and its effectiveness for information retrieval. arXiv:0806.3765 (2008)

  21. Chaplan, M.A.: Mapping “Laborline thesaurus” terms to Library of Congress subject headings: implications for vocabulary switching. Libr. Q. 65, 39–61 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Doerr, M.: Semantic problems of thesaurus mapping. J. Digit. Inf. 1(8) (2006)

  23. Brahami, M., Atmani, B., Matta, N.: Dynamic knowledge mapping guided by data mining: application on healthcare. J. Inf. Process. Syst. 9(1), 1–30 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nagpal, G., Uddin, M., Kaur, A.: A comparative study of estimation by analogy using data mining techniques. J. Inf. Process. Syst. 8(4), 621–652 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, S., Englebienne, G., Schlobach, S.: Learning concept mappings from instance similarity. In: The Semantic Web-ISWC 2008, pp. 339–355. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Liping, Z., Guangyao, L., Yongquan, L., Jing, S.: Design of ontology mapping framework and improvement of similarity computation. J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 18(3), 641–645 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Farquhar, A., Fikes, R., Rice, J.: The Ontolingua server: a tool for collaborative ontology construction. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 46(6), 707–727 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Czarnecki, K., Antkiewicz, M.: Mapping features to models: a template approach based on superimposed variants. In: Generative Programming and Component Engineering, pp. 422–437. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Gruber, T.: Collective knowledge systems: where the social web meets the semantic web. J. Web Semant. 6(1), 4–13 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Salton, G.: A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun. ACM 18(11), 613–620 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Bringer, J., Chabanne, H.: Embedding edit distance to enable private keyword search. Hum.-Cent. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2(1), 1–12 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No 71271200 and National Twelfth “Five-Year Plan” for Science and Technology Support Program under Grant Nos 2011BAH10B04, 2011BAH10B02 are greatly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianfeng Guo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, L., Shi, C. & Guo, J. Mapping discovery modeling and its empirical research for the scientific and technological knowledge concept in unified concept space. Cluster Comput 18, 103–112 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-013-0339-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-013-0339-7

Keywords

Navigation