Abstract
This research is to discuss management strategies selection and enterprise life cycle periods referencing fuzzy proximity from fuzzy set theory and based on the current development situation of enterprises in China. First, this paper measures the degree of proximity for eight kinds of management strategies and different enterprise life-cycle periods (the pioneering period, growth period, maturity period and recession period) using a fuzzy proximity vector. The eight management strategies include management idea innovation, management organization innovation, management method innovation, management culture innovation, management institution innovation, market innovation, business model innovation and performance management innovation. Second, this paper analyzes management innovation strategies in different enterprise life cycle periods, and verifies the consequences using an example of the developmental history of one engine manufacturing enterprise since 1997. Several conclusions can be drawn from this research: (1) The frame model of management innovation strategies in the enterprise’s life cycle is both reasonable and convincing as a reference for management innovation strategies selection when enterprises are developing. (2) The fuzzy proximity method can be applied to research where a management innovation strategy during a particular life cycle needs to be selected. Therefore, this research extends the application and scope of the fuzzy proximity method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Daft, R.L.: A dual-core model of organizational innovation. J. Acad. Manag. 21(2), 193–210 (1978)
Stata, R.: Organizational learning: the key to management innovation. Sloan Manag. Rev. 63(1), 63–73 (1989)
Jing, S.W., Niu, Z.W.: Definition of the concept and content of enterprise management innovation. The 16th China Management Science Academic Annual Conference, pp. 654–658 (2014)
Mol, M.J., Birkinshaw, J.: The sources of management innovation: when firms introduce new management practices. J. Bus. Res. 62(12), 1269–1280 (2009)
Su, J.O., Wang, H.C.: The management innovation fit process mechanism analysis of third partylogistics enterprise: based on multi-case study. Sci. Sci. Manag. S. T. 30(10), 69–77 (2010)
Peltoniemi, M.: Reviewing industry life-cycle theory: avenues for future research. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 13(4), 349–375 (2011)
Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organization. IBM Syst. J. 32(1), 4–16 (1993)
Wang, H.C., Su, J.O., Cao, H.L.: The management innovation fit path of third party logistics enterprise. Sci. Sci. Manag. S. T. 34(4), 128–135 (2013)
Dewar, R.D., Dutton, J.E.: The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: an empirical analysis. Manag. Sci 32(11), 1422–1433 (1986)
Su, J.Q., Cui, M.: Selection of management innovation types for Chinese enterprises in complex context. J. Ind.Eng. Eng. Manag. 25(4), 26–36 (2011)
Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., Mol, M.J.: Management innovation. Acad. Manage. Rev. 33(4), 825–845 (2008)
Mol, M.J., Birkinshaw, J.: The role of external involvement in the creation of management innovations. Org. Stud. 35(9), 1287–1312 (2014)
Boer, H., During, W.E.: Management of process innovation—the case of FMS: a systems approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 25(11), 1671–1682 (1987)
Wright, C., Sturdy, A., Wylie, N.: Management innovation through standardization: consultants as standardizers of organizational practice. Res. Policy 41(3), 652–662 (2012)
Wiengarten, F., Fynes, B., Cheng, E.T.C., et al.: Taking an innovative approach to quality practices: exploring the importance of a company’s innovativeness on the success of TQM practices. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51(10), 3055–3074 (2013)
Niu, Z.W., Jing, S.W.: Discussion on management innovation model of manufacturing enterprises based on lean production. J. Tianjin Univ. 16(6), 481–487 (2014)
Zhang, Y.Q., Li, H.M.: Analysis on methods to applying triz to solve management innovation problems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 655–658 (2015)
Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A.: Organizational innovation: the challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large scale surveys. Technovation 28(10), 644–657 (2008)
Büschgens, T., Bausch, A., Balkin, D.B.: Organizational culture and innovation: a meta-analytic review. J Prod Innov Manag 30(4), 763–781 (2013)
Perdomo-Ortiz, J., Galende, J.G.J.: The intervening effect of business innovation capability on the relationship between total quality management and technological innovation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 47(18), 5087–5107 (2009)
Sivertsson, O., Tell, J.: Barriers to business model innovation in Swedish agriculture. Sustainability 7(2), 1957–1969 (2015)
Mihola, J., Wawrosz, P., Kotesovcova, J.: Is the most innovative firm in the world really innovative? Int. Adv. Econ. Res. 21(1), 41–54 (2015)
Kach, A., Wagner, A.A.S.M.: The influence of different knowledge workers on innovation strategy and product development performance in small and medium-sized enterprises. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(8), 2489–2505 (2015)
Giannopoulos, A.: Performance management as a process of promoting innovation in software industry. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 175(2), 401–407 (2015)
Song, W., Ming, X., Han, Y., et al.: An integrative framework for innovation management of product–service system. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(4), 2252–2268 (2014)
Schumpeter, J.A.: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Brothers, New York (1947)
Cameron, K.S., Whetten, D.A.: Perceptions of organizational effectiveness over organizational life cycles. Adm. Sci. Q. 26(4), 525–544 (1981)
Puri, M., Zarutskie, R.: On the life cycle dynamics of venture-capital and non-venture-capital-financed firms. J. Financ. 67(6), 2247–2293 (2012)
Feng, B.Y.: Comparing of the corporate life cycle assessment methods based on kappa test. J. Appl. Stat. Manag. 33(4), 673–681 (2014)
Venkatraman, N.: The concept of fit in strategy research: toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(3), 423–444 (1989)
Wang, B.C.: Study on identification method of corporate life cycle: profile deviation method. Stat. Inf. Forum 28(5), 14–19 (2013)
Liang, H.S., Shi, C.S.: Study on enterprise’s life cycle based on fuzzy set theory. IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, pp. 1025–1029 (2006)
Yan, H.Z., Ma, L.H.: The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of enterprise life cycle based on AHM. International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, pp. 232–235 (2009)
Du, G.: Foundations of managerial mathematics: theory and application. Tianjin University Press, Tianjin (2006)
Zhou, S.W., Xiang, Q.M., Wang, Y.Q.: The evaluation method for tunnel structure health condition based on asymmetric proximity. Appl. Mech. Mater. 548–549, 1721–1727 (2014)
Hua, Z.S., Liang, L.: Multi-objective classification algorithm based on fuzzy proximity. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 3(3), 19–24 (1994)
Miao, Y.J.: Enterprise life cycle’s decision-making characteristics in various stages and innovation management strategy analysis. Appl. Mech. Mater. 33(10), 143–147 (2010)
Acknowledgements
This research work are supported by the Program for the Philosophy and Social Sciences Research of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi No. 2016(39), the Humanities and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (15YJC630016), and National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 71071107. We would like to acknowledge spirit support of Research Assistant Center, Show Chwan Health Care System.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jing, S., Yang, Y., Ho, ZP. et al. The development of a frame model for management strategies selection using fuzzy proximity. Cluster Comput 20, 141–153 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-0739-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-0739-1