Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The development of a frame model for management strategies selection using fuzzy proximity

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research is to discuss management strategies selection and enterprise life cycle periods referencing fuzzy proximity from fuzzy set theory and based on the current development situation of enterprises in China. First, this paper measures the degree of proximity for eight kinds of management strategies and different enterprise life-cycle periods (the pioneering period, growth period, maturity period and recession period) using a fuzzy proximity vector. The eight management strategies include management idea innovation, management organization innovation, management method innovation, management culture innovation, management institution innovation, market innovation, business model innovation and performance management innovation. Second, this paper analyzes management innovation strategies in different enterprise life cycle periods, and verifies the consequences using an example of the developmental history of one engine manufacturing enterprise since 1997. Several conclusions can be drawn from this research: (1) The frame model of management innovation strategies in the enterprise’s life cycle is both reasonable and convincing as a reference for management innovation strategies selection when enterprises are developing. (2) The fuzzy proximity method can be applied to research where a management innovation strategy during a particular life cycle needs to be selected. Therefore, this research extends the application and scope of the fuzzy proximity method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daft, R.L.: A dual-core model of organizational innovation. J. Acad. Manag. 21(2), 193–210 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stata, R.: Organizational learning: the key to management innovation. Sloan Manag. Rev. 63(1), 63–73 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jing, S.W., Niu, Z.W.: Definition of the concept and content of enterprise management innovation. The 16th China Management Science Academic Annual Conference, pp. 654–658 (2014)

  4. Mol, M.J., Birkinshaw, J.: The sources of management innovation: when firms introduce new management practices. J. Bus. Res. 62(12), 1269–1280 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Su, J.O., Wang, H.C.: The management innovation fit process mechanism analysis of third partylogistics enterprise: based on multi-case study. Sci. Sci. Manag. S. T. 30(10), 69–77 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peltoniemi, M.: Reviewing industry life-cycle theory: avenues for future research. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 13(4), 349–375 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organization. IBM Syst. J. 32(1), 4–16 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, H.C., Su, J.O., Cao, H.L.: The management innovation fit path of third party logistics enterprise. Sci. Sci. Manag. S. T. 34(4), 128–135 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dewar, R.D., Dutton, J.E.: The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: an empirical analysis. Manag. Sci 32(11), 1422–1433 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Su, J.Q., Cui, M.: Selection of management innovation types for Chinese enterprises in complex context. J. Ind.Eng. Eng. Manag. 25(4), 26–36 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., Mol, M.J.: Management innovation. Acad. Manage. Rev. 33(4), 825–845 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mol, M.J., Birkinshaw, J.: The role of external involvement in the creation of management innovations. Org. Stud. 35(9), 1287–1312 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boer, H., During, W.E.: Management of process innovation—the case of FMS: a systems approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 25(11), 1671–1682 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wright, C., Sturdy, A., Wylie, N.: Management innovation through standardization: consultants as standardizers of organizational practice. Res. Policy 41(3), 652–662 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wiengarten, F., Fynes, B., Cheng, E.T.C., et al.: Taking an innovative approach to quality practices: exploring the importance of a company’s innovativeness on the success of TQM practices. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51(10), 3055–3074 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Niu, Z.W., Jing, S.W.: Discussion on management innovation model of manufacturing enterprises based on lean production. J. Tianjin Univ. 16(6), 481–487 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, Y.Q., Li, H.M.: Analysis on methods to applying triz to solve management innovation problems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 655–658 (2015)

  18. Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A.: Organizational innovation: the challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large scale surveys. Technovation 28(10), 644–657 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Büschgens, T., Bausch, A., Balkin, D.B.: Organizational culture and innovation: a meta-analytic review. J Prod Innov Manag 30(4), 763–781 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Perdomo-Ortiz, J., Galende, J.G.J.: The intervening effect of business innovation capability on the relationship between total quality management and technological innovation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 47(18), 5087–5107 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sivertsson, O., Tell, J.: Barriers to business model innovation in Swedish agriculture. Sustainability 7(2), 1957–1969 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mihola, J., Wawrosz, P., Kotesovcova, J.: Is the most innovative firm in the world really innovative? Int. Adv. Econ. Res. 21(1), 41–54 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kach, A., Wagner, A.A.S.M.: The influence of different knowledge workers on innovation strategy and product development performance in small and medium-sized enterprises. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(8), 2489–2505 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Giannopoulos, A.: Performance management as a process of promoting innovation in software industry. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 175(2), 401–407 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Song, W., Ming, X., Han, Y., et al.: An integrative framework for innovation management of product–service system. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(4), 2252–2268 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schumpeter, J.A.: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Brothers, New York (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cameron, K.S., Whetten, D.A.: Perceptions of organizational effectiveness over organizational life cycles. Adm. Sci. Q. 26(4), 525–544 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Puri, M., Zarutskie, R.: On the life cycle dynamics of venture-capital and non-venture-capital-financed firms. J. Financ. 67(6), 2247–2293 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Feng, B.Y.: Comparing of the corporate life cycle assessment methods based on kappa test. J. Appl. Stat. Manag. 33(4), 673–681 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Venkatraman, N.: The concept of fit in strategy research: toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(3), 423–444 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, B.C.: Study on identification method of corporate life cycle: profile deviation method. Stat. Inf. Forum 28(5), 14–19 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liang, H.S., Shi, C.S.: Study on enterprise’s life cycle based on fuzzy set theory. IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, pp. 1025–1029 (2006)

  33. Yan, H.Z., Ma, L.H.: The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of enterprise life cycle based on AHM. International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, pp. 232–235 (2009)

  34. Du, G.: Foundations of managerial mathematics: theory and application. Tianjin University Press, Tianjin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhou, S.W., Xiang, Q.M., Wang, Y.Q.: The evaluation method for tunnel structure health condition based on asymmetric proximity. Appl. Mech. Mater. 548–549, 1721–1727 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hua, Z.S., Liang, L.: Multi-objective classification algorithm based on fuzzy proximity. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 3(3), 19–24 (1994)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Miao, Y.J.: Enterprise life cycle’s decision-making characteristics in various stages and innovation management strategy analysis. Appl. Mech. Mater. 33(10), 143–147 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work are supported by the Program for the Philosophy and Social Sciences Research of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi No. 2016(39), the Humanities and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (15YJC630016), and National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 71071107. We would like to acknowledge spirit support of Research Assistant Center, Show Chwan Health Care System.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zih-Ping Ho or Hua-Tzu Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jing, S., Yang, Y., Ho, ZP. et al. The development of a frame model for management strategies selection using fuzzy proximity. Cluster Comput 20, 141–153 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-0739-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-0739-1

Keywords

Navigation