Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An early intelligent diagnosis model for drilling overflow based on GA–BP algorithm

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aiming at the problems existing in the current drilling overflow accident, this paper uses standpipe pressure (SPP) and casing pressure (CP) monitoring data based on the pressure wave transmission to eliminate the impact of pressure wave jitter on the overall trend of SPP and CP monitoring data by eigenvalue extraction of the monitoring data of SPP and CP. The GA–BP (Genetic algorithm and BP neural network) is used to establish the functional relationship between the expected outputs of well overflow diagnostic model and several characteristic parameters. The model reduces the error caused by the selection of single feature parameters, and also the convergence speed of BP neural network is accelerated by genetic algorithm, and avoids falling into local extreme value. The early diagnosis of drilling overflow is achieved, and probability of wrong judgment and miss judgment of drilling kick is reduced. Finally, the drilling data of YY well in a certain oilfield is taken as the research object. The experimental results show that the error of the GA–BP model is 73.73% less and the accuracy is higher than the BP neural network model. The early-stage intelligent diagnosis model of drilling overflow based on GA–BP algorithm can timely and effectively diagnoses the accident of drilling overflow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen, P.: Drilling and Well Completion Engineering. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. BP: Deepwater Horizon Accident Investigation Report . http://www.bp.com (2010). Accessed 1 July 2011

  3. En, M.P., Li, X.F., Shi, F.Q., et al.: Research of seabed rescue method of uncontrolled blowout in offshore drilling. Adv. Mater. Res. 616, 837–843 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta, V., Dhameliya, J.D., Jain, S.: Liquid lift dual gradient drilling in deep water: early kick detection and control. In: SPE Western Regional & AAPG Pacific Section Meeting 2013 Joint Technical Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2013)

  5. Feng, Jian, Jianhong, Fu, et al.: Predicting pressure behavior during dynamic kill drilling with a two phase flow. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 22, 591–597 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rui, C., Qian, L., Yin, H.: Application of case based reasoning technology in drilling risk prediction. Fault Block Oil Gas Field 20(2), 225–227 (2013)

  7. He, Z., Qiying, L., Luzhi, Z., et al.: Intelligent early warning technology based on fuzzy expert system. J. Southwest Pet. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 38(2), 169–175 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liang, H., Yongqiang, T., Xiang, L., et al.: Research on drilling kick and loss monitoring method based on bayesian classification. Pak. J. Stat. 30(6), 1251–1266 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luo, Y.: Early Ground Monitoring and Diagnosis System of Overflow Research and Design of. Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu (2014)

  10. Nybo, R., Bjorkevoll, K.S., Rommetveit, R.: Spotting a false alarm. In: Integrating Experience And Real-Time Analysis With Artificial Intelligence. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2008)

  11. Don, R.: A simplified and highly effective method to identify influx and losses during managed pressure drilling without the use of a Coriolis flow meter. In: SPE/IADC Managed Pressure Drilling and Underbalanced Operations Conference and Exhibition, 24–25 February, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2010)

  12. Don, R.: Development of an automated system for the rapid detection of drilling anomalies using standpipe and discharge pressure. In: SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, 1–3 March, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2011)

  13. Mills, I., Reitsma, D., Hardt, J., et al.: Simulator and the first field test results of an automated early kick detection system that uses standpipe pressure and annular discharge pressure. SPE/IADC Managed Pressure Drilling and Underbalanced Operations Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2012)

  14. Kin, K., Gumus, F., Osayande, N.: A case study: first field application of fully automated kick detection and control by system in western Canada. In: SPE/IADC 168948. American (2014)

  15. Reza, A.: Flow regime analysis assists early detection of a shallow gas kick. In: SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, 25-28 September, Manama, Bahrain. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2011)

  16. Ding, S., Su, C., Yu, J.: An optimizing BP neural network algorithm based on genetic algorithm. Artif. Intell. Rev. 36(2), 153–162 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, J., Guo, B., Shen, Y., Li, D., Huang, Y.: A modeling approach for energy saving based on GA-BP neural network. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 11(5), 1289–1298 (2016)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by mega project of science research in Sichuan province (No. JY0049) .The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments and suggestions of the reviewers, which have improved the presentation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haibo Liang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, H., Zou, J. & Liang, W. An early intelligent diagnosis model for drilling overflow based on GA–BP algorithm. Cluster Comput 22 (Suppl 5), 10649–10668 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1152-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1152-5

Keywords

Navigation