Skip to main content
Log in

The power load’s signal analysis and short-term prediction based on wavelet decomposition

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The complex signal represented by power load is affected by many factors, so the signal components are very complicated. So that, it is difficult to obtain satisfactory prediction accuracy by using a single model for the complex signal. In this case, wavelet decomposition is used to decompose the power load into a series of sub signals. The low frequency sub signal is remarkably periodic, and the high frequency sub signals can prove to be chaotic signals. Then the signals of different characteristics are predicted by different models. For the low frequency sub signal, the support vector machine (SVM) is adopted. In SVM model, air temperature and week attributes are included in model inputs. Especially the week attribute is represented by a 3-bit binary encoding, which represents Monday to Sunday. For the chaotic high frequency sub signals, the chaotic local prediction (CLP) model is adopted. In CLP model, the embedding dimension and time delay are key parameters, which determines the prediction accuracy. In order to find the optimal parameters, a segmentation validation algorithm is proposed in this paper. The algorithm segments the known power load according to the time sequence. Then, based on the segmentation data, the optimal parameters are chosen based on the prediction accuracy. Compared with a single model, the prediction accuracy of the proposed algorithm is improved obviously, which proves the effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hu, D.G., Shu, H., Hu, H.D.: Spatiotemporal regression Kriging to predict precipitation using time-series MODIS data. Cluster Comput. 20(1), 347–357 (2017). SI

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, G.W., Xu, L.Y., Xue, Y.L.: Model and forecast stock market behavior integrating investor sentiment analysis and transaction data. Cluster Comput. 20(1), 789–803 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hirata, Y., Aihara, K.: Improving time series prediction of solar irradiance after sunrise: comparison among three methods for time series prediction. Solar Energy 149, 294–301 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang, G.L., Cao, S.Q., Wu, Y.: Recent advancements in signal processing and machine learning. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014 Article ID 549024 (2014)

  5. Moreau, F., Gibert, D., Holschneider, M., et al.: Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform: basic theory. J. Geophys. Res. 104(B3), 5003–5013 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mallat, S.: A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing: The Sparse Way, vol. 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumari, G.S., Kumar, S.k.: Electrocardio graphic signal analysis using wavelet transforms. In: 2015 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Signals, Communication and Optimization (EESCO), pp. 1–6 (2015)

  8. Rosenstein, M.T., Collins, J.J., Luca, C.J.D.: A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Phys. D 65(1–2), 117–134 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Yong, Z.: New prediction of chaotic time series based on local Lyapunov exponent. Chin. Phys. Lett. 22(5) Article ID 020503 (2013)

  10. Corts, C., Vapnik, V.: Support vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20(3), 273–297 (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Petra, V., Anna, B.E., Viera, R., Slavomír, Š., et al.: Smart grid load forecasting using online support vector regression. Comput. Electr. Eng. 000, 1–16 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Su, L.Y., Li, C.L.: Local prediction of chaotic time series based on polynomial coefficient autoregressive model. Math. Probl. Eng. 2015, Article ID 901807

  13. Qu, J.L., Wang, X.F., Qiao, Y.C, et al.: An improved local weighted linear prediction model for chaotic time series. Chin. Phys. Lett. 31(2) Article ID 020503 (2014)

  14. Frandes, M., Timar, B., Timar, R., Lungeanu, D.: Chaotic time series prediction for glucose dynamics in type 1 diabetes mellitus using regime-switching models. Sci. Rep. 7 Article ID 6232 (2017)

  15. Livi, L., Sadeghian, A.: Granular computing, computational intelligence, and the analysis of non-geometric input spaces. Granul. Comput. 1(1), 13–20 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Antonelli, M., Ducange, P., Lazzerini, B., Marcelloni, F.: Multi-objective evolutionary design of granular rule-based classifiers. Granul. Comput. 1(1), 37–58 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lingras, P., Haider, F., Triff, M.: Granular meta-clustering based on hierarchical, network, and temporal connections. Granul. Comput. 1(1), 71–92 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Skowron, A., Jankowski, A., Dutta, S.: Interactive granular computing. Granul. Comput. 1(2), 95–113 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Bridging gaps between several forms of granular computing. Granul. Comput. 1(2), 115–126 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yao, Y.: A triarchic theory of granular computing. Granul. Comput. 1(2), 145–157 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ciucci, D.: Orthopairs and granular computing. Granul. Comput. 1(3), 159–170 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Mallat, S.: Multi-resolution approximations and wavelet orthogonal bases of l2(r). Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 315, 67–87 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smola, A., Scholkopf, B.: A Tutorial on Support Vector Regression. Royal Holloway College, London (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, H.R., Han, Z.Z.: An improved sequential minimal optimization learning algorithm for regression support vector machine. J. Softw. 12(3), 2006–2013 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Takens, F.: Detecting Strange Attractors in Fluid Turbulence. Springer, Berlin (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Gautama, T., Mandic, D.P., Van Hulle, M.M.: A differential entropy based method for determining the optimal embedding parameters of a signal. In: 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Hong Kong, China: IEEE, pp. 29–32 (2003)

  27. Kohavi, R.: A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. 14, 1137–1143 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rao, C.R., Wu, Y.: Linear model selection by cross-validation. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 128(1), 231–240 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61300095 and 11604094), Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 2017JJ2068) and the Science Research Foundation of Hunan Provincial Education Department (Grant Nos. 16C0479 and 14A037).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Ouyang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Ouyang, M., Wang, Z. et al. The power load’s signal analysis and short-term prediction based on wavelet decomposition. Cluster Comput 22 (Suppl 5), 11129–11141 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1316-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1316-3

Keywords

Navigation