Abstract
The capability to bring products to market which comply with quality, cost and development time goals is vital to the survival of firms in a competitve environment. New product development comprises knowledge creation and search and can be organized in different ways. In this paper, we study the performance of several alternative organizational models for new product development using a model of distributed, self-adapting (learning) agents. The agents (a marketing and a production agent) are modelled via neural networks. The artificial new product development process analyzed starts with learning on the basis of an initial set of production and marketing data about possible products and their evaluation. Subsequently, in each step of the process, the agents search for a better product with their current models of the environment and, then, refine their representations based on additional prototypes generated (new learning data). Within this framework, we investigate the influence of different types of new product search methods and generating prototypes/learning according to the performance of individual agents and the organization as a whole. In particular, sequential, team-based Trial & Error and House of Quality guided search are combined with prototype sampling methods of different intensity and breadth; also, the complexity of the agents (number of hidden units) is varied. It turns out that both the knowledge base and the search procedure have a significant impact on the agents' generalization ability and success in new product development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17, 99–120
Carley KM (1995) Computational and mathematical organization theory: Perspective and directions. Comput Math Organ Theory 1(1), 39–56
Carley KM, Svoboda D (1996) Modeling organizational adaptation as a simulated annealing process. Sociol Meth Res 25(1), 138–168
Carley KM, Gasser L (1999) Computational organization theory. In: G. Weiss (ed). Multiagent Systems: A modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Manag Sci 35, 1504–1511
Dutta S, Narasimhan N, Rajiv S (1999) Success in high-technology markets: is marketing capability critical? Marketing Science,18, 547–568
Hamel G, Prahalad CK (1994) Competing for the future. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Hanson SJ, Burr DJ (1990) What Connectionist Models Learn: Learning and Representation in Connectionist Networks. Behav Brain Sci 13, 471–518
Hauser JR, Clausing D (1988) The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, 63–73
March J (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1), 71–87
Lant TK (1994) Computer simulations of organizations as experimental learning systems: Implications for organization theory. In: Carley, K., Prietula, M.J. (eds.) Computational organization theory, Hillsdale, NJ
McClelland JL, Rumelhart DE (1986) Parallel distributed processing. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition {II}: psychological and biological models. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Mahoney JT, Pandian JR (1992) The resource-based view within the conversion of strategic management. Strat Manag J 13, 363–380
Natter M, Mild A, Feurstein M, Dorffner G, Taudes A (2001) The effect of incentive schemes and organizational arrangements on the new product development process. Management Science, 47
Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company. Oxford Univ.~Press.
Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strat Manag J 14, 179–191
Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization, Doubleday, NY
Shocker AD, Srinivasan, V (1979). Multi-attribute approaches for product concept evaluation and generation: A critical review. J Mark Res 16, 159–180
Thulin IG (2002). Interview given by 3M Vice president for Gurusonline (download on 25.3.2005), http://gurusonline.tv/uk/conteudos/tulin.asp
Verona GA (1999). A resource-based view of product development. Acad Manag Rev 24 132–142
Wernerfelt B (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strat Manag J 5, 171–180.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Andreas Mild was born in Vienna, Austria, in 1973. He studied business administration in Vienna, in 2000 he received his Ph.D. from the Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration (WU). Since 2003 he is associated professor at the WU. He has been guest professor in Frankfurt, Germany, Sydney, Australia and Bangkok, Thailand. Previous research appeared in Journals such as MIS Quarterly, Management Science and Marketing Science. His research interests currently include agent-based models, new product development and recommender systems.
Alfred Taudes was born in Vienna, Austria, in 1959. He studied business administration and management information systems (MIS) in Vienna (doctorate 1984), in 1991 he received his Ph.D. from the Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration (WU). He was assistant professor at the WU (1986–1991) and professor for MIS at the German Universities of Augsburg (1991), Münster (1991/92) and Essen (1992/93). Since 1993, he has been professor for MIS at the WU and Head of the Department for Production Management. Since 2000, Dr. Taudes has been speaker for the Special Research Area SFB # 010 (Adaptive Information Systems and Modelling in Economics and Management Science). His research interests currently include agent-based models of industry structures, management of innovation, technology management and business strategy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mild, A., Taudes, A. An agent-based investigation into the new product development capability. Comput Math Organiz Theor 13, 315–331 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-006-9012-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-006-9012-5