Abstract
Does virtuality in organizations require centralization or decentralization? We specify the coordination and information processing requirements for virtual organizing in order to examine how these requirements are met by centralized and decentralized structural designs, respectively. We use the agent based SimVision computational discrete event simulation model as our experimental platform to develop concise and comparable measures of the information processing needs of virtual organizing, and how these are met by the information processing capabilities of the centralized and decentralized structures. Contrary to conventional wisdom, that the centralized form is more effective in virtual settings than the decentralized form.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Ahuja MJ, Carley KM (1999) Network structure in virtual organizations. Organ Sci 10(6):741–757
Alberts DS, Hayes RE (2003) Power to the edge. CCRP, Washington
Alberts DS, Hayes RE (2006) Understanding command and control. CCRP, Washington
Armstrong DJ, Cole P (2002) Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In: Hinds P, Kiesler SB (eds) Distributed work. MIT Press, Cambridge
Arrow KJ (1974) The limits of organization. Norton, New York
Brewer MB (1996) In-group favoritism: the subtle side of intergroup discrimination. In: Messick DM, Tenbrunsel A (eds) Codes of conduct: behavioral research and business ethics. Russell Sage Found, New York, pp 160–171
Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The management of innovation. Tavistok, London
Burton RM (2003) Computational laboratories for organization science: questions, validity and docking. Comput Math Organ Theory 9(2):91–108
Burton RM, Obel B (1995) The validity of computational models in organization science: from model realism to purpose of the model. Comput Math Organ Theory 1(1):57–71
Burton RM, Obel B (2004) Strategic organizational diagnosis and design—the dynamics of fit. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
Burton RM, DeSanctis G, Obel B (2006) Organizational design: a step-by-step approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Carroll T, Burton RM (2000) Organizations and complexity: searching for the edge of chaos. Comput Math Organ Theory 6:319–337
Chesbrough H, Kusunoki K (2001) The modularity trap: innovation, technology phases shifts and the resulting limits of virtual organizations. In: Nonaka I, Teece D (eds) Managing industrial knowledge. Sage, London, pp 202–230
Chesbrough HW, Teece DJ (1996) When is virtual virtuous? Harv Bus Rev 65–73
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning organizations. Organ Sci 7:119–135
Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ Sci 12(3): 346–371
Daft RL, Lengel RH, Trevino LK (1987) Message equivocality, media selection and manager performance: implications for information systems. MIS Q 11:355–366
Davis JP, Bingham CB, Eisenhardt KM (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad Manag J
Davis SM, Lawrence PR (1977) Matrix. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Dennis AR, Fuller RM, Valacich J (2008) Media, tasks and communication processes: a theory of media synchronicity. MIS Q 32(3):575–600
DeSanctis G, Monge P (1999) Introduction to the special issue: communication processes for virtual organizations. Organ Sci 10(6):693–703
Galbraith JR (1974) Organization design: an information processing view. Interfaces 4(3)
Galbraith JR (1977) Organization design. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Grinter R, Herbsleb J, Perry D (1999) The geography of coordination: dealing with distance in R&D work. In: Proceedings of GROUP’99. ACM Press, New York
Guetzkow H, Simon H (1955) The impact of certain communication nets upon organization and performance in task-oriented groups. Manag Sci 1:233–250
Hamblin H (1995) Employees’ perspectives on one dimension of labour flexibility: working at a distance. Work Employ Soc 9(3):473–498
Harrison JR, Lin Z, Carroll GR, Carley KM (2007) Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Acad Manag J
Herbsleb J, Mockus A, Finholt T, Grinter R (2000) Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2000. ACM Press, New York
Hinds PJ, McGrath C (2006) Structures that work: structure and coordinated ease in geographically distributed teams. Group Organ Interfaces 343–352
Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: the moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ Sci 16(3):290–307
Horii T, Jin Y, Levitt RE (2005) Modelling and analyzing cultural influences on project team performance. Comput Math Organ Theory 10:305–321
Jehn KA (1997) A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Adm Sci Q 42(3):530–557
Jensen KW, Haakonsson DD, Burton RM, Obel B (2009) Embedding virtuality into organization design theory: virtuality and its information processing consequences. In: Bøllingtoft A, Håkonsson DD, Nielsen JF, Snow CC, Ulhøi J (eds) New approaches to designing and organizing. Springer, Boston
Jin Y, Levitt RE (1996) The virtual design team: a computational model of project organizations. Comput Math Organ Theory 2(3):171–196
Kim J, Burton RM (2002) The effect of task uncertainty and decentralization on project team performance. Comput Math Organ Theory 8(4):365–384
Kirkman BL, Mathieu JE (2005) The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. J Manag 31(5):700–718
Kramer R (1999) Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Ann Rev Psychol 50:569–598
Kraut RE, Fussell SR, Brennan SE, Siegel J (2002) Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In: Hinds P, Kiesler S (eds) Distributed work. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 137–162
Kumar J (2006) Working as a designer in a global team. Interactions 25–27
Kurland NB, Egan TD (1999) Telecommuting: justice and control in the virtual organization. Organ Sci 10(4):500–513
Levitt RE (1999) The VitéProject handbook: a users guide to modeling and analyzing project work processes and organizations. Manual to VitéProject tm 2.2. Vité Corp
Levitt RE (2004) Computational modeling of organizations comes of age. J Comput Math Organ Theory 10(2):127–145
Levitt RE, Cohen GP, Kunz JC, Nass CI, Christiansen TR, Yin J (1994) The virtual design team: simulating how organization structure and information processing tools affect team performance. In: Carley KM, Prietula M (eds) Computational and mathematical organization theory. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Levitt RE, Thomson J, Christiansen TR, Kunz JC, Yin J, Nass CI (1999) Simulating project work processes and organizations: towards a micro-contingency theory of organizational design. Manag Sci 45(11):1479–1495
Lipnick J, Stamps J (1997) Virtual teams: researching across space, time and organizations with technology. Wiley, New York
Liu X, Magjuka R, Lee S (2008) The effects of cognitive thinking styles, trust, conflict management on online students’ learning and virtual team performance. Br J Educ Technol 39(5):829–846
March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New York
Malone TW, Crowston K (1994) The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput Surv 26(1):87–120
Martins LL, Gilson LL, Maynard TM (2004) Virtual teams: what do we know and where do we go from here? J Manag 30(6):805–835
McCann J, Galbraith JR (1981) Interdepartmental relations. In: Nystrom P, Starbuck W (eds) Handbook of organizations, vol 2. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 60–84
Mintzberg H (1979) The structuring of organizations. Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs
Mowshowitz A (1997) Virtual organization. Commun ACM 40(9):30–37
Mulders DEM, Romme AGL (2009) Unpacking dynamic capability: a design perspective. In: Bøllingtoft A, Håkonsson DD, Nielsen JF, Snow CC, Ulhøi J (eds) New approaches to designing and organizing. Springer, Boston
Nissen ME (2007) Computational experimentation on new organizational forms: exploring behavior and performance of edge organizations. Comput Math Organ Theory 13(3):203–240
Nohria N, Eccles RG (1992) Face-to-face: making network organizations work. In: Nohria N, Eccles RG (eds) Networks and organizations. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, pp 288–308
Olson MH (1982) New information technology and organizational culture. Manag Inf Syst Q 71–92. Special Issue (December)
O’Leary MB, Cummings JN (2007) The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographical dispersion in teams. MIS Q 31(3):433–452
Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Adm Sci Q 48(2):240–267
Rogers E, Bhowmik D (1970) Homophily-heterophily: relational concepts for communication research. Public Opin Q 34:523–538
Siggelkow N, Rivkin JE (2005) Speed and search: designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ Sci 16:101–122
Simon HA (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):125–134
Sundstrom E, De Meuse KP, Furtrell D (1990) Work teams: applications and effectiveness. Am Psychol 45(2):120–133
Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manag J 28(13):1319–1350
Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill, New York
Tushman M (1979) Work characteristics and submit communication structure: a contingency analysis. Adm Sci Q 24:82–97
Tushman ML, Nadler D (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad Manag Rev 3:613–624
Wong SS, Burton RM (2002) Virtual teams: what are their characteristics and impact on team performance? Comput Math Organ Theory 6:339–360
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jensen, K.W., Håkonsson, D.D., Burton, R.M. et al. The effect of virtuality on the functioning of centralized versus decentralized structures—an information processing perspective. Comput Math Organ Theory 16, 144–170 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-010-9069-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-010-9069-z