Abstract
Trust can be viewed at the same time as an instrument both for an agent selecting the right partners in order to achieve its own goals, and for an agent of being selected from other potential partners in order to establish with them a cooperation/collaboration and to take advantage from the accumulated trust. In this paper we will analyze trust as the agents’ relational capital. Starting from the classical dependence network with potential partners, we introduce the analysis of what it means for an agent to be trusted and how this condition could be strategically used from it for achieving its own goals, that is, why it represents a form of power. The idea of taking another agent’s point of view is especially important if we consider the amount of studies in social science that connect trust with social capital related issues. Although there is a big interest in literature about ‘social capital’ and its powerful effects on the wellbeing of both societies and individuals, often it is not clear enough what is it the object under analysis. Individual trust capital (relational capital) and collective trust capital not only should be disentangled, but their relations are quite complicated and even conflicting. To overcome this gap, we propose a study that first attempts to understand what trust is as capital of individuals. In which sense “trust” is a capital. How this capital is built, managed and saved. In particular, how this capital is the result of the others’ beliefs and goals. Then we aim to analytically study the cognitive dynamics of this object.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Bird BR, Smith AE (2005) Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Curr Antropol 46(2)
Boella G, Sauro L, van der Torre L (2004) Social viewpoints on multiagent systems. In: Third international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS’04), vol 3, pp 1358–1359
Boella G, van der Torre L, Villata S (2009) Analyzing cooperation in iterative social network design. J Univers Comput Sci
Bourdieu P (1983) Forms of capital. In: Richards JC (ed) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood Press, New York
Castelfranchi C, Conte R (1996) The dynamics of dependence networks and power relations in open multi-agent systems. In: Proc COOP’96—second international conference on the design of cooperative systems, Juan-les-Pins, France, June, 12–14. INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis, pp 125–137
Castelfranchi C, Falcone R (1998) Principles of trust for MAS: cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification. In: Proceedings of the international conference of multi-agent systems (ICMAS’98), Paris, July 1998, pp 72–79
Castelfranchi C, Falcone R (2003) From automaticity to autonomy: The frontier of artificial agents. In: Hexmoor H, Castelfranchi C, Falcone R (eds) Agent autonomy. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 103–136
Castelfranchi C, Miceli M, Cesta A (1992) Dependence relations among autonomous agents. In: Werner E, Demazeau Y (eds) Decentralized AI-3. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 215–227
Cialdini RB (1990) Influence et manipulation. First, Paris
Coleman JC (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94:S95–S120
Conte R, Castelfranchi C (1996) Simulating multi-agent interdependencies. A two-way approach to the micro-macro link. In: Mueller U, Troitzsch K (eds) Microsimulation and the social science. Lecture notes in economics. Springer, Berlin
Conte R, Paolucci M (2002) Reputation in artificial societies. Social beliefs for social order. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Falcone R, Castelfranchi C (2001) Social trust: A cognitive approach. In: Castelfranchi C, Tan Y-H (eds) Trust and deception in virtual societies. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 55–90
Golbeck J, Parsia B, Hendler J (2003) Trust networks on the semantic web. In: Proceedings of cooperative information agents 2003, August 27–29, 2003, Helsinki, Finland
Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78:1360–1380
Hang CW, Wang Y, Singh MP (2009) Operators for propagating trust and their evaluation in social networks. In: Proceedings of the eight international joint conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS)
Jøsang A, Ismail R (2002) The beta reputation system. In: Proceedings of the 15th Bled conference on electronic commerce, Bled, Slovenia
Pollack M (1990) Plans as complex mental attitudes. In: Cohen PR, Morgan J, Pollack ME (eds) Intentions in communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 77–103
Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New York
Schelling T (1960) The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Sichman J, Conte R, Castelfranchi C, Demazeau Y (1994) A social reasoning mechanism based on dependence networks. In: Proceedings of the 11th ECAI
Spece M (1973) Job market signaling. Q J Econ 87:296–332
Ziegler CN (2009) On propagation interpersonal trust in social network. In: Golbeck J (ed) Computing with social trust. Human computer interaction series. Springer, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C. Trust and relational capital. Comput Math Organ Theory 17, 179–195 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-011-9086-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-011-9086-6