Abstract
This paper aims to improve the accuracy of standard compartment models in modeling the dynamics of an influenza pandemic. Standard compartment models, which are commonly used in influenza simulations, make unrealistic assumptions about human behavioral responses during a pandemic outbreak. Existing simulation models with public avoidance also make a rigid assumption regarding the human behavioral response to influenza. This paper incorporates realistic assumptions regarding individuals’ avoidance behaviors in a standard compartment model. Both the standard and modified models are parameterized, implemented, and compared in the research context of the 2009 H1N1 influenza outbreak in Arizona. The modified model with heterogeneous coping behaviors forecasts influenza spread dynamics better than the standard model when evaluated against the empirical data, especially for the beginning of the 2009–2010 normal influenza season starting in October 2009 (i.e., the beginning of the second wave of 2009 H1N1). We end the paper with a discussion of the use of simulation models in efforts to help communities effectively prepare for and respond to influenza pandemics.







Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Notes
An influenza pandemic is “a global outbreak of disease that occurs when a new influenza virus appears or “emerges” in the human population, causes serious illness, and then spreads easily from person to person worldwide” (CDC 2012). It is different from pandemic influenza, which refers to the influenza that causes a global outbreak of the disease.
Note that these are the laboratory confirmed cases. On August 30, 2009, the CDC stopped reporting laboratory-confirmed 2009 H1N1 influenza cases because such data tends to underestimate the true number of cases (CDC 2010b), whereas ADHS continued to report weekly laboratory-confirmed cases in Arizona. Given the difficulty in determining the true number of infected cases or the true case detection rate, a previous study (an der Heiden et al. 2009) used the number of laboratory-confirmed cases and an assumed case detection rate to estimate the actual number of cases. In this paper, the actual number of infected cases is calculated based on the number of laboratory-confirmed cases in Arizona reported by ADHS and a 10 % detection rate of 2009 H1N1 influenza cases as in the study by an der Heiden et al. (2009).
Previous researchers have found that self-protective action is a family-level decision, and the whole household usually acts as one respondent (Ekberg et al. 2009; Vaughan and Tinker 2009). Here we assumed that the proportion of households in Arizona taking avoidance actions might be equivalent to the proportion of (susceptible) people taking avoidance actions.
The modified model has one stochastic variable, the avoidance behavior effect. We run the model 20 and 100 times separately for each scenario shown in Figs. 3, 4 and 5. The results for 100 runs are very similar to those from 20 runs. In each scenario shown in Fig. 3, for example, the results from 20 and 100 runs are not much different, and the curve of cumulative morbidity (Fig. 4) produced from 100 runs is almost identical to that from 20 runs. In this paper we report the simulation results from 20 runs.
References
ACS (2009) American Community Survey. American Community Survey (ACS). http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DatasetMainPageServlet?_program=ACS&_submenuId=datasets_2&_lang=en&_ts=. Accessed 3 Feb 2011
ADHS (2009a) Arizona supplemental influenza summary: MMWR week 39. Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS). http://www.azdhs.gov/phs/oids/epi/flu/pdf/az_flureport_supp_39_0809.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2011
ADHS (2009b) Arizona weekly influenza summary: MMWR week 40. Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS). http://www.azdhs.gov/phs/oids/epi/flu/pdf/h1n1_report_october14.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2011
ADHS (2009c) Arizona orders 2009 H1N1 vaccine for state; Counties plan distribution of vaccine. Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS). http://www.azdhs.gov/diro/pio/news/2009/VaccineRequest-093009.htm. Accessed 1 July 2012
ADHS (2009d) H1N1 vaccine information. Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS). http://www.hr.az.gov/State_Employee/PDF/News_Vaccine.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2012
ADHS (2009e) Report to the governor on H1N1 influenza preparedness and response activities. Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS). http://www.azdhs.gov/pandemicflu/pdf/governors%20report%20h1n1.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2012
an der Heiden M, Buchholz U, Krause G, Kirchner G, Claus H, Ha WH (2009) Breaking the waves: modelling the potential impact of public health measures to defer the epidemic peak of novel influenza A/H1N1. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008356
Araz OM, Lant T, Fowler JW, Jehn M (2011) A simulation model for policy decision analysis: a case of pandemic influenza on a university campus. J Simul 5:89–100
Balcan D, Colizza V, Singer AC, Chouaid C, Hu H, Gonçalves B, Bajardi P, Poletto C, Ramasco JJ, Perra N, Tizzoni M, Paolotti D, Broeck WVd, Valleron A, Vespignani A (2009) Modeling the critical care demand and antibiotics resources needed during the fall 2009 wave of influenza A (H1N1) pandemic. PLoS Curr. doi:10.1371/currents.RRN1133
Barrat A, Barthelemy M, Vespignani A (2008) Dynamical processes on complex networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bobashev GV, Goedecke DM, Yu F, Epstein J (2007) A hybrid epidemic model: combining the advantages of agent-based and equation-based approaches. In: Henderson SG, Hsieh MH, Shortle J, Tew JD, Barton RR (eds) Proceedings of the 2007 winter simulation conference. Society for Computer Simulation International, Washington, pp 1532–1537
Bults M, Beaujean DJ, de Zwart O, Kok G, van Empelen P, van Steenbergen JE, Richardus JH, Voeten HA (2011) Perceived risk, anxiety, and behavioural responses of the general public during the early phase of the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the Netherlands: results of three consecutive online surveys. BMC Public Health. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-2
CDC (2009a) H1N1 early outbreak and disease characteristics. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/surveillanceqa.htm. Accessed 3 Feb 2011
CDC (2009b) Updated interim recommendations for the use of antiviral medications in the treatment and prevention of influenza for the 2009–2010 season. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/recommendations.htm. Accessed 3 Feb 2011
CDC (2010a) H1N1 flu. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/. Accessed 3 Feb 2011
CDC (2010b) Monitoring influenza activity, including 2009 H1N1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/reportingqa.htm. Accessed 1 July 2012
CDC (2010c) Key facts about 2009 H1N1 flu vaccine. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/vaccine_keyfacts.htm. Accessed 3 Feb 2011
CDC (2012) Questions and answers on the executive order adding potentially pandemic influenza viruses to the list of quarantinable diseases. http://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/qa-executiveorder-pandemic-list-quarantinable-diseases.html. Retrieved 21 Nov 2012
Coburn BJ, Wagner BG, Blower S (2009) Modeling influenza epidemics and pandemics: insights into the future of swine flu (H1N1). BMC Med. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-7-30
Cowling BJ, Ng S, Ma ESK, Cheng CKY, Wai W, Fang VJ, Chan K-H, Ip DKM, Chiu SS, Peiris JSM, Leung GM (2009) Protective efficacy of seasonal influenza vaccination against seasonal and pandemic influenza virus infection during 2009 in Hong Kong. Clin Infect Dis 51(12):1370–1379
Das T, Savachkin A, Zhu Y (2008) A large scale simulation model of pandemic influenza outbreaks for development of dynamic mitigation strategies. IIE Trans 40(9):893–905
de Zwart O, Veldhuijzen IK, Richardus JH, Brug J (2010) Monitoring of risk perceptions and correlates of precautionary behaviour related to human avian influenza during 2006–2007 in the Netherlands: results of seven consecutive surveys. BMC Infect Dis. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-10-114
Destefano F, Haber M, Currivan D, Farris T, Burrus B, Stone-Wiggins B, McCalla A, Guled H, Shih H, Edelson P, Wetterhall S (2010) Factors associated with social contacts in four communities during the 2007–2008 influenza season. Epidemiol Infect. doi:10.1017/S095026881000230X
Donaldson LJ, Rutter PD, Ellis BM, Greaves FEC, Mytton OT, Pebody RG, Yardley IE (2009) Mortality from pandemic A/H1N1 2009 influenza in England: public health survelliance study. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.b5213
Donner B (2006) Public warning response to hurricane Katrina: a preliminary analysis. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
Donner WR, Rodriguez H, Diaz W (2007) Public warning response following tornadoes in New Orleans, LA, and Springfield, MO: a sociological analysis. Paper presented at the 87th annual meeting of the American meteorological society, San Antonio, Texas, 15–18 Jan 2007
Edmunds WJ, Kafatos G, Wallinga J, Mossong JR (2006) Mixing patterns and the spread of close-contact infectious diseases. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. doi:10.1186/1742-7622-3-10
Ekberg J, Eriksson H, Morin M, Holm E, Strömgren M, Timpka T (2009) Impact of precautionary behaviors during outbreaks of pandemic influenza: modeling of regional differences. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2009:163–167
Epstein JM, Parker J, Cummings D, Hammond RA (2008) Coupled contagion dynamics of fear and disease: mathematical and computational explorations. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003955
Ferguson NM, Cummings DAT, Cauchemez S, Fraser C, Riley S, Meeyai A, Iamsirithaworn S, Burke DS (2005) Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in southeast Asia. Nature 437(8):209–214
Halder N, Kelso JK, Milne GJ (2010) Analysis of the effectiveness of interventions used during the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic. BMC Public Health. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-168
Holland C (2009) H1N1 vaccine to arrive in Arizona today. http://www.azfamily.com/news/health/H1N1-vaccine-to-arrive-in-Arizona-today-63593292.html. Accessed 1 July 2012
Jefferson T, Foxlee R, Mar CD, Dooley L, Ferroni E, Hewak B, Prabhala A, Nair S, Rivetti A (2008) Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses: systematic review. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.39393.510347.BE
Jehn M, Kim Y, Bradley B, Lant T (2011) Community knowledge, risk perception and preparedness for the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic. J Public Health Manag Pract 17(5):431–438
Jenvald J, Morin M, Timpka T, Eriksson H (2007) Simulation as decision support in pandemic influenza preparedness and response. In: Van de Walle B, Burghardt P, Nieuwenhuis C (eds) Proceedings of the 4th international conference on information systems for crisis response and management. Vub Brussels University Press, Brussels, pp 295–304
Jones JH, Salathe M (2009) Early assessment of anxiety and behavioral response to novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1). PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008032
Keeling MJ, Rohani P (2008) Modeling infectious disease in humans and animals. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Kermack WO, McKendrick AG (1927) A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc R Soc Lond A 115(772):700–721
Kermack WO, McKendrick AG (1932) A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics: the problem of endemicity. Proc R Soc Lond A 138(834):55–83
Kermack WO, McKendrick AG (1933) A contribution to the mathematical theory epidemics: further studies of the problem of endemicity. Proc R Soc Lond A 141(843):94–122
Larson RC, Nigmatulina KR (2009) Engineering responses to pandemics. Inf Knowl Syst Manag 8(1–4):311–339
Lau JT, Yang X, Tsui H, Kim JH (2003) Monitoring community psychological responses to the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong: from day 10 to day 62. J Epidemiol Community Health 57(11):864–870
Lau JT, Kim JH, Tsui H, Griffiths S (2007) Anticipated and current preventative behaviours in response to an anticipated human-to-human H5N1 epidemic in Hong Kong Chinese general population. BMC Infect Dis. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-7-18
Lau JT, Griffiths S, Choi KC, Tsui HY (2010) Avoidance behaviors and negative psychological responses in the general population in the initial stage of the H1N1 pandemic in Hong Kong. BMC Infect Dis. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-10-139
Lee BY, Brown ST, Korch GW, Cooley PC, Zimmerman RK, Wheaton WD, Zimmer SM, Grefenstette JJ, Bailey RR, Assi TM, Burke DS (2010a) A computer simulation of vaccine prioritization, allocation, and rationing during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. Vaccine 28(31):4875–4879
Lee BY, Tai JHY, Bailey RR, Smith KJ, Nowalk AJ (2010b) Economics of influenza vaccine administration timing for children. Am J Manag Care 16(3):e75–e85
Leung GM, Lam T-H, Ho L-M, Ho S-Y, Chan BHY, Wong IOL, Hedley AJ (2003) The impact of community psychological responses on outbreak control for severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. J Epidemiol Community Health 57(11):857–863
Li MY, Graef JR, Wang L, Karsai J (1999) Global dynamics of a SEIR model with varying total population size. Math Biosci 160(2):191–213
Longini IM, Halloran ME, Nizam A, Yang Y (2004) Containing pandemic influenza with antiviral agents. Am J Epidemiol 159(7):623–633
Mileti DS (1995) Factors related to flood warning response. Paper presented at the US–Italy Research Workshop on the Hydrometeorology, Impacts, and Management of Extreme Floods, Perugia, Italy, 13–17 Nov 1995
Mileti D, Sorensen JH (1990) Communication of emergency public warnings. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN
Mileti DS, Fitzpatrick C (1992) The causal sequence of risk communication in the parkfield earthquake prediction experiment. Risk Anal 12(3):393–400
Mileti DS, Darlington JD (1997) The role of searching behavior in response to earthquake risk information. Soc Probl 44(1):89–103
Mniszewski SM, Valle SYD, Stroud PD, Riese JM, Sydoriak SJ (2008) Pandemic simulation of antivirals+school closures: buying time until strain-specific vaccine is available. Comput Math Organ Theory 14(3):209–221
Monto AS (2006) Vaccines and antiviral drugs in pandemic preparedness. Emerg Infect Dis 12(1):55–60
Mossong J, Hens N, Jit M, Beutels P, Auranen K, Mikolajczyk R, Massari M, Salmaso S, Tomba GS, Wallinga J, Heijne J, Todys MS, Rosinska M, Edmunds WJ (2008) Social contacts and mixing patterns relevant to the spread of infectious diseases. PLoS Med. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050074
Patel R, Longini IM, Halloran ME (2005) Finding optimal vaccination strategies for pandemic influenza using genetic algorithms. J Theor Biol 234(2):201–212
Perry RW (1979) Incentives for evacuation in natural disaster: research based community emergency planning. J Am Plan Assoc 45(4):440–447
Perry RW, Lindell MK, Greence MR (1980) Enhancing evacuation warning compliance: suggestions for emergency planning. Disasters 4(4):443–449
Pfister N (2002) Community response to flood warnings: the case of an evacuation from Grafton, March 2001. Aust J Emerg Manag 17(2):19–29
Philipson TJ (2000) Economic epidemiology and infectious disease. In: Cuyler AJ, Newhouse JP (eds) Handbook of health economics, vol 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1761–1799
Philipson TJ, Posner RA (1993) Private choices and public health: the AIDS epidemic in an economic perspective. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Quarantelli EL (1983) People’s reactions to emergency warnings. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
Rahmandad H, Sterman J (2008) Heterogeneity and network structure in the dynamics of diffusion: comparing agent-based and differential equation models. Manag Sci 54(5):998–1014
Ross T, Zimmer S, Burke D, Crevar C, Carter D, Stark J, Giles B, Zimmerman R, Ostroff S, Lee B (2010) Seroprevalence following the second wave of pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza. PLoS Curr. doi:10.1371/currents.RRN1148
Rost G, Wu J (2008) SEIR epidemiological model with varying infectivity and infinite delay. Math Biosci Eng 5(2):389–402
Shanks J (2009) Arizona swine flu: Maricopa County gets first case. National Ledger. http://www.nationalledger.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=36&num=25842. Accessed 3 Feb 2011
Tuite AR, Greer AL, Whelan M, Winter A-L, Lee B, Yan P, Wu J, Moghadas S, Buckeridge D, Pourbohloul B, Fisman DN (2010) Estimated epidemiologic parameters and morbidity associated with pandemic H1N1 influenza. CMAJ 182(2):131–136
Ulene V (2007) Bracing for a flu pandemic. Los Angeles Times. http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-he-themd4jun04,1,3259716.column. Accessed 4 June 2007
Vaughan E, Tinker T (2009) Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations. Am J Publ Health 99(s2):S324–S332
Yang Y, Sugimoto JD, Halloran ME, Basta NE, Chao DL, Matrajt L, Potter G, Kenah E, Longini IM (2009) The transmissibility and control of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus. Science 326(5953):729–733
Yoo B-K, Kasajima M, Bhattacharya J (2010) Public avoidance and the epidemiology of novel H1N1 influenza A. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge
Zhong W (2012) Communicative competence: computational simulation approach to public emergency management. Dissertation, Arizona State University
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS) through a Health and Human Services (HHS) preparedness grant, Arizona State University College of Public Program’s research seed grant, and the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant (NRF-2010-330-B00262). The authors thank Diane Reed and Andrew Lawless at ADHS, and Ken Anderson at Maricopa County Research & Reporting. We also thank Deborah Schumacher, Tanida Rojchanakasetchai, Barrie Bradley and Tim Lant, who helped conduct this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhong, W., Kim, Y. & Jehn, M. Modeling dynamics of an influenza pandemic with heterogeneous coping behaviors: case study of a 2009 H1N1 outbreak in Arizona. Comput Math Organ Theory 19, 622–645 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-012-9146-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-012-9146-6