Abstract
Agents interaction about reputation has to deal with semantic interoperability issues, which can be handled by different approaches using different levels of expressiveness. Previous experiments have already been conducted in order to investigate the effects of a more expressive communication language on agents’ reputation evaluation accuracy, but their analyses disregard the possible correlations among reputation models’ attributes. Here, we propose the use of a multivariate statistical approach in order to take into account such correlations and to encourage the social simulation community to analyze its experimental outputs using formal mathematical approaches. We also applied the presented approach to the experimental results previously analyzed using a univariate statistical approach. Our analysis corroborate with the latter showing that, in most cases, there is benefit in using a more expressive communication language.







Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
This number of permutations was arbitrarily chosen, since the whole set of permutations (\(\frac{20!}{10!} \approx67 \times10^{10}\)) is computation prohibitive.
References
Baringhaus L, Franz C (2004) On a new multivariate two-sample test. J Multivar Anal 88(1):190–206. doi:10.1016/S0047-259X(03)00079-4
Brandão AAF, Vercouter L, Casare SJ, Sichman JS (2007) Extending the ART testbed to deal with heterogeneous agent reputation models. In: Castelfranchi C, Barber S, Sabater-Mir J, Singh M (eds) Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on trust in agent societies (TRUST’07), Honolulu, USA
Casare S, Sichman JS (2005) Towards a functional ontology of reputation. In: Dignum F, Dignum V, Koenig S, Kraus S, Singh MP, Wooldridge M (eds) Proceedings of the 4th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS’05. ACM Press, New York, pp 505–511
Fullam KK, Klos TB, Muller G, Sabater-Mir J, Schlosser A, Topol Z, Barber KS, Rosenschein JS, Vercouter L, Voss M (2005a) A specification of the agent reputation and trust (ART) testbed: experimentation and competition for trust in agent societies. In: Dignum F, Dignum V, Koenig S, Kraus S, Singh MP, Wooldridge M (eds) Proceedings of the 4th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS’05. ACM Press, New York, pp 512–518
Fullam KK, Klos TB, Muller G, Sabater-Mir J, Topol Z, Barber KS, Rosenschein J, Vercouter L (2005b) The agent reputation and trust (ART) testbed architecture. In: Proceeding of the 2005 conference on artificial intelligence research and development. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 389–396
Fullam KK, Klos TB, Muller G, Sabater-Mir J, Schlosser A, Topol Z, Barber KS, Rosenschein JS, Vercouter L, Voss M (2006) The agent reputation and trust (art) testbed game description (version 2.0). URL http://megatron.iiia.csic.es/art-testbed/pdf/SpecSummary.pdf
Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S (2012) Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int J Endocrinol Metabol 10(2):486–489. doi:10.5812/ijem.3505
Higgins JJ (2004) Introduction to modern nonparametric statistics. Duxbury advanced series. Books/Cole Thomson Learning, Pacific Grove
Horling B, Lesser V (2004) A survey of multi-agent organizational paradigms. Knowl Eng Rev 19(4):281–316. doi:10.1017/S0269888905000317
Hotelling H (1931) The generalization of student’s ratio. Ann Math Stat 2(3):360–378
Huynh TD, Jennings NR, Shadbolt N (2004) FIRE: an integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th European conference on artificial intelligence, Valencia, ES, pp 18–22
Johnson RA, Wichern DW (2002) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
Kalfoglou Y, Schorlemmer M (2003) Ontology mapping: the state of the art. Knowl Eng Rev 18(1):1–31
Moses Y, Tennenholtz M (1995) Artificial social systems. Comput Artif Intell 14(6):533–562
Mui L, Halberstadt A, Mohtashemi M (2002) Evaluating reputation in multi-agents systems. In: Falcone R, Barber KS, Korba L, Singh MP (eds) Trust, reputation, and security: theories and practice, AAMAS 2002 international workshop, Bologna, Italy, July 15, 2002. Selected and invited papers. Springer, Berlin, pp 123–137
Muller G, Vercouter L (2008) L.I.A.R. achieving social control in open and decentralised multi-agent systems. Tech. rep, École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, FR
Nardin LG, Brandão AA, Sichman JS, Vercouter L (2008) SOARI: a service oriented architecture to support agent reputation models interoperability. In: Falcone R, Barber SK, Sabater-Mir J, Singh MP (eds) Trust in agent societies: 11th international workshop, TRUST 2008, Estoril, Portugal, May 12–13, 2008. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, revised selected and invited papers, vol 5396. Springer, Berlin, pp 292–307. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-92803-4_15
Nardin LG, Muller G, Brandão AAF, Sichman JS, Vercouter L (2009) Effects of expressiveness and heterogeneity of reputation models in the ART testbed: some preliminary experiments using the SOARI architecture. In: Proceedings of the 12th international workshop on trust in agent societies, Budapest, HU
Nardin LG, Brandão AAF, Sichman JS (2011) Experiments on semantic interoperability of agent reputation models using the SOARI architecture. Eng Appl Artif Intell 24(8):1461–1471. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2011.05.004
Ostrom E (1998) A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. Am Polit Sci Rev 92(1):1–22. doi:10.2307/2585925
Puri ML, Sen PK (1969) A class of rank order tests for a general linear hypothesis. Ann Math Stat 40(4):1325–1343
Puri ML, Sen PK (1971) Nonparametric methods in multivariate analysis. Wiley, New York
R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL http://www.R-project.org
Rowley J (2006) An analysis of the e-service literature: towards a research agenda. Internet Res 16(3):339–359
Sabater-Mir J, Sierra C (2002) Social ReGreT, a reputation model based on social relations. ACM SIGecom Exch 3(1):44–56
Sabater-Mir J, Paolucci M, Conte R (2006) Repage: REPutation and ImAGE among limited autonomous partners. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 9(2):3. URL http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/2/3.html
Schilling MF (1986) Multivariate two-sample tests based on nearest neighbors. J Am Stat Assoc 81(395):799–806
Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3–4):591–611. doi:10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
Silvapulle MJ, Sen PK (2004) Constrained statistical inference: inequality, order, and shape restrictions. Wiley, New York
Vercouter L, Casare SJ, Sichman JS, Brandão A (2007) An experience on reputation models interoperability based on a functional ontology. In: Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI’07), Hyderabad, IN, pp 617–622
Visser U, Stuckenschmidt H, Wache H, Vögele T (2000) Enabling technologies for interoperability. In: Visser U, Pundt H (eds) Proceedings of the workshop on the 14th international symposium of computer science for environmental protection, TZI, Bonn, DE, pp 35–46
Wooldridge M (2009) An introduction to multiagent systems, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester
Zacharia G, Maes P (2000) Trust management through reputation mechanisms. Appl Artif Intell 14(9):881–907
Acknowledgements
We would like to thanks Pranab Kumar Sen for his invaluable advices on multivariate statistical analysis. This project was partially supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) grants 2008/06356-3 and 2010/20620-5. Jaime S. Sichman was partially supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nardin, L.G., Brandão, A.A.F., Kira, E. et al. Effects of reputation communication expressiveness in virtual societies. Comput Math Organ Theory 20, 113–132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-012-9151-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-012-9151-9