Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Evidence-based modelling of hybrid organizational strategies

  • Manuscript
  • Published:
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organizations frequently adopt multiple strategies to satisfy conflicting and competing goals. Modeling the organizational characteristics associated with such hybrid strategies is an important challenge for organization scientists. This study proposes the use of a novel evidence-based computational approach to the ambiguous classification of organizations (N-state Classification and Ranking Belief Simplex or NCaRBS) to model hybrid organizational strategies. Drawing on the Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence methodology, the computational mechanics of NCaRBS are illustrated by modelling hybrid configurations of Miles and Snow’s (Organizational strategy, structure and process, 1978) classic strategic stances: prospecting, defending and reacting. Analysis is carried out using data on the characteristics of over 100 organizations. The results show that NCaRBS is uniquely able to demonstrate the full range of ambiguity in the relationships between contingent organizational characteristics. Further potential applications of NCaRBS in the field of computational and mathematical organization theory are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. It is worth noting that, if standardised forms of Pv i , Dv i and Rv i (and respective means, minimums and maximums) were employed, the same \( P_{i}^{PS} \), \( D_{i}^{PS} \) and \( R_{i}^{PS} \) values would have been calculated.

  2. The values 0.5 come from the expressions for \( P_{i}^{PS} \), \( D_{i}^{PS} \) and \( R_{i}^{PS} \), these could be changed to more accommodate the possible skewness of Pv i , Dv i and Rv i values (replacing with 0.4, 0.6 etc.) – however this would not affect the relative positions later found.

  3. The initial fit measure needs to be interpreted in context, namely that an organization is not solely associated with a single strategy, instead, as shown in Fig. 1, the actual hybrid strategy values indicate that organizational strategies are ambiguous.

References

  • Bailey A, Johnson G, Daniels K (2000) Validation of a multi-dimensional measure of strategy development processes. Br J Manag 11:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon MJ (2005a) A novel technique of object ranking and classification under ignorance: an application to the corporate failure risk problem. Eur J Oper Res 167:493–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon MJ (2005b) Optimizing object classification under ambiguity/ignorance: application to the credit rating problem. Int J Intell Syst Account Financ Manag 13:113–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon MJ, Buchanan K (2004) Object classification under ignorance using CaRBS: the case of the European Barn Swallow. Expert Syst Appl 27(3):403–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon MJ, Kitchener M (2005) Ranking the ‘balance’ of state long-term care systems: a comparative exposition of the SMARTER and CaRBS techniques. Health Care Manag Sci 8:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon MJ, Jones L, Holt CA (2006) Classification of osteoarthritic and normal knee function using three dimensional motion analysis and the Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Ser 36:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon MJ, Andrews RA, Boyne G (2010a) Evidence-based modelling of strategic fit: an introduction to RCaRBS. Eur J Oper Res 207(2):886–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon MJ, Moutinho L, Veloutsou C (2010b) Supermarket choice as a gender classification problem: an expositional analysis in the presence of ignorance using CaRBS. Eur J Mark 44(1–2):267–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budayan C, Dikmen I, Birgonul MT (2009) Comparing the performance of traditional cluster analysis, self-organizing maps and fuzzy c-means method for strategic grouping. Expert Syst Appl 36(9):11772–11781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conant JS, Mokwa MP, Varadarajan PR (1990) Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: a multiple measures based study. Strateg Manag J 11(5):365–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster AP (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multiple valued mapping. Ann Math Stat 38:325–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denœux T, Zouhal LM (2001) Handling possibilistic labels in pattern classification using evidential reasoning. Fuzzy Sets Syst 122:409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo WS, Grewal R (2008) Hybrid strategic groups. Strateg Manag J 29(3):293–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo WS, Di Benedetto AC, Song M, Sinha I (2005) Revisiting the miles and snow strategic framework: uncovering interrelationships between strategic types, capabilities, environmental uncertainty, and firm performance. Strateg Manag J 26(1):47–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeTienne KB, DeTienne DH, Joshi SA (2003) Neural networks as statistical tools for business researchers. Organ Res Method 6:236–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty DH, Glick WH, Huber GP (1993) Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: a test of two configurational theories. Acad Manag J 36(6):1198–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan H-Y, Lampinen J (2003) A trigonometric mutation operation to differential evolution. J Global Optim 27:105–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganster DC, Hennessy HW, Luthans F (1983) Social desirability response effects: three alternative models. Acad Manag J 26:321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart S, Banbury C (1991) How strategy-making processes can make a difference. Strateg Manag J 15(2):251–269

    Google Scholar 

  • James WL, Hatten KJ (1995) Further evidence on the validity of the self typing paragraph approach: miles and snow strategic archetypes in banking. Strateg Manag J 16(2):161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones P, Beynon MJ (2007) Temporal support in the identification of e-learning efficacy: an example of object classification in the presence of ignorance. Expert Syst 24:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones AL, Beynon MJ, Holt CA, Roy S (2006) A novel approach to the exposition of the temporal development of post-op osteoarthritic knee subjects. J Biomech 39:2512–2520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz D, Kahn RL (1978) The social psychology of organizations, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel SW, Kolari JW (1987) Marketing strategy implications of the miles and snow strategic typology. J Market 51(4):19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merigó JM, Casanovas M (2009) Induced aggregation operators in decision making with Dempster–Shafer belief structure. Int J Intell Syst 24(8):934–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merigó JM, Casanovas M (2010) Linguistic aggregation operators for linguistic decision making based on the Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 18(3):287–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles R, Snow C (1978) Organizational strategy, structure and process. McGraw Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D, Friesen PH (1978) Archetypes of strategy formulation. Manag Sci 24(9):921–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roesmer C (2000) Nonstandard analysis and Dempster–Shafer theory. Int J Intell Syst 15:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safranek RJ, Gottschlich S, Kak AC (1990) Evidence accumulation using binary frames of discernment for verification vision. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 6:405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer GA (1976) Mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Smarandache F, Dezert J (2004) Advances and applications of DSmT for information fusion, vol 1. American Research Press, Rehoboth

    Google Scholar 

  • Smarandache F, Dezert J (2006) Advances and applications of DSmT for information fusion, vol 2. American Research Press, Rehoboth

    Google Scholar 

  • Smarandache F, Dezert J (2009) Advances and applications of DSmT for information fusion, vol 3. American Research Press, Rehoboth

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow CC, Hrebiniak LG (1980) Strategy, distinctive competence and organizational performance. Adm Sci Q 25(2):317–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens JM, McGowan RP (1983) Managerial strategies in municipal government organizations. Acad Manag J 26(3):527–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian A, Nilakanta S (1996) Organizational innovativeness: exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. OMEGA 24:631–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven A, Graco M, Hinings CR (2013) Returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs. Acad Manag Ann 7:391–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker RM, Enticott G (2004) Using multiple informants in public administration: revisiting the managerial values and actions debate. J Public Adm Res Theor 14:417–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR, Liu L (2008) Classic works of the Dempster–Shafer theory of belief functions. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JB, Singh MG (1994) An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 24(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3EU, Wales, UK

    Malcolm J. Beynon, Rhys Andrews & George A. Boyne

Authors
  1. Malcolm J. Beynon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rhys Andrews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. George A. Boyne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malcolm J. Beynon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beynon, M.J., Andrews, R. & Boyne, G.A. Evidence-based modelling of hybrid organizational strategies. Comput Math Organ Theory 21, 1–23 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-014-9174-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-014-9174-5

Keywords