Abstract
Integrating more features into one product makes the product more attractive, thereby increasing initial sales; however, once customers start using the high-feature product, they become dissatisfied with the usability problems caused by too many features. This phenomenon is called “feature fatigue”. Feature fatigue will lead to dissatisfaction and negative word-of-mouth, which will damage the brand’s long-term profit, and ultimately decrease the manufacturer’s customer equity. In this paper, we propose an approach based on the Bass model to analyze the effects of feature fatigue on customer equity, helping designers evaluate and alleviate feature fatigue. We integrate product capability, usability, and word-of-mouth effects into the Bass model to analyze customer purchase behavior under different product capability and usability. Then a customer equity model is proposed to calculate customer equity according to customer purchase behavior. A feature fatigue degree is defined and a feature fatigue evaluation method is proposed, providing decision supports for designers to decide what features should be added so as to alleviate feature fatigue. Finally, a case example is illustrated to validate the proposed approach.








Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Agterhuis D (2012) Effects of apps on consumer behavior of smartphones and telecommunication providers: feature fatigue vs. mass customization. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven
Alexander DL, Lynch JG, Wang Q (2008) As time goes by: do cold feet follow warm intentions for really new versus incrementally new products? J Mark Res 45(3):307–319
Anderson EW (1998) Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. J Serv Res 1(1):5–17
Angelis MD (2008) The effect of adding features on product attractiveness: the role of product perceived congruity. University of Bologna, Bologna
Bass FM (1969) A new product growth for model consumer durables. Manag Sci 15(5):215–227
Bass FM (2004) Comments on “a new product growth for model consumer durables”: the Bass model. Manag Sci 50(12):1833–1840
Bass FM, Krishnan TV, Jain DC (1994) Why the Bass model fits without decision variables. Marketing Science 13(3):203–223
Berger PD, Nasr NI (1998) Customer lifetime value: marketing models and applications. J Interact Mark 12(1):17–30
Bertini M, Ofek E, Ariely D (2009) The impact of add-on features on consumer product evaluations. J Consum Res 36(1):17–28
Blattberg RC, Deighton J (1996) Manage marketing by the customer equity test. Harv Bus Rev 74(4):136–144
Blattberg RC, Getz G, Thomas JS (2001) Customer equity: Building and managing relationships as valuable assets. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Bughin J, Doogan J, Vetvik OJ (2010) A new way to measure word-of-mouth marketing. McKinsey Q 2:113–116
Dodds W (1973) An application of the Bass model in long-term new product forecasting. J Mark Res 10(3):308–311
Dumas JS, Redish JC (1993) A practical guide to usability testing. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood
Ellison G (2005) A model of add-on pricing. Q J Econ 120(2):585–637
Gill T (2008) Convergent products: what functionalities add more value to the base? J Mark 72(2):46–62
Hamilton RW, Thompson DV (2007) Is there a substitute for direct experience? Comparing consumers’ preferences after direct and indirect product experiences. J Consum Res 34(4):546–555
Hogan JE, Lemon KN, Libai B (2003) What is the true value of a lost customer? J Serv Res 5(3):196–208
Hogan JE, Lemon KN, Libai B (2004) Quantifying the ripple: word-of-mouth and advertising effectiveness. J Advert Res 44(3):271–280
Jiao J, Chen CH (2006) Customer requirement management in product development: a review of research issues. Concur Eng Res Appl 14(3):173–185
Jokela T (2004) When good things happen to bad products: where are the benefits of usability in the consumer appliance market? Interactions 11(6):28–35
Kalish S (1985) A new product adoption model with price, advertising, and uncertainty. Manage Sci 31(12):1569–1585
Kang KC, Cohen SG, Hess JA, Novak WE, Peterson AS (1990) Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
Keijzers J, Ouden ED, Lu Y (2008) The ‘double-edged sword’ of high-feature products: an explorative study of the business impact. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual product development and management association (PDMA) international research conference, Orlando, pp 13–17
Kruger J, Galak J, Burrus J (2007) When consumers’ self-image motives fail. J Consum Psychol 17(4):250–253
Lee D-S, Pan Y-H (2007) Lessons from applying usability engineering to fast-paced product development organizations. In: Aykin N (ed) Usability and Internationalization. In: HCI and Culture, 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, pp 346–354
Lekvall P, Wahlbin C (1973) A study of some assumptions underlying innovation diffusion functions. Swed J Econ 75(4):362–377
Li M, Wang L (2011) Feature fatigue analysis in product development using Bayesian networks. Expert Syst Appl 38(8):10631–10637
Li M, Wang L, Wu M (2013) A multi-objective genetic algorithm approach for solving feature addition problem in feature fatigue analysis. J Intell Manuf 24(6):1197–1211
Manzon EA (2013) Avoiding the buyer’s fallacy: consumer perceptions of products before purchase. University of Michigan, Michigan
Norman DA (1988) The design of everyday things. Basic Books, New York
Norton JA, Bass FM (1987) A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successive generations of high-technology products. Manag Sci 33(9):1069–1086
Norton JA, Bass FM (1992) Evolution of technological generations: the law of capture. Sloan Manag Rev 33(2):66–77
Nowlis SM, Simonson I (1996) The effect of new product features on brand choice. J Mark Res 33(1):36–46
Ozer M, Cebeci U (2010) The role of globalization in new product development. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 57(2):168–180
Parker PM (1994) Aggregate diffusion forecasting models in marketing: a critical review. Int J Forecast 10(2):353–380
Reichheld FF (1996) The loyalty effect: The hidden force behind growth, profits, and lasting value. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Rockbridge Associates (2004) National technology readiness survey. Rockbridge Associates Inc, Great Falls
Rust RT, Thompson DV, Hamilton RW (2006) Defeating feature fatigue. Harv Bus Rev 84(2):98–107
Sela A, Berger J (2012) How attribute quantity influences option choice. J Mark Res 49(6):942–953
Srinivasan V, Mason CH (1986) Nonlinear least squares estimation of new product diffusion models. Mark Sci 5(2):169–178
Sultan F, Farley JU, Lehmann DR (1990) A meta-analysis of applications of diffusion models. J Mark Res 27(1):70–77
Sweeney JC, Soutar GN, Mazzarol T (2008) Factors influencing word of mouth effectiveness: receiver perspectives. Eur J Mark 42(3/4):344–364
Thompson DV, Norton MI (2011) The social utility of feature creep. J Mark Res 48(3):555–565
Thompson DV, Hamilton RW, Rust RT (2005) Feature fatigue: when product capabilities become too much of a good thing. J Mark Res 42(4):431–442
Wu M, Wang L (2011) Feature fatigue analysis based on behavioral decision making. Paper presented at the Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). In: 2011 IEEE international conference, Singapore, 6–9 Dec
Wu M, Wang L (2012) A continuous fuzzy Kano’s model for customer requirements analysis in product development. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B 226(3):535–546
Yang C, Lee S-G, Lee J (2013) Entry barrier’s difference between ICT and non-ICT industries. Ind Manag Data Syst 113(3):461–480
Yeh C, Huang J, Yu C (2011) Integration of four-phase QFD and TRIZ in product R&D: a notebook case study. Res Eng Des 22(3):125–141
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 71072061).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, M., Wang, L. & Li, M. An approach based on the Bass model for analyzing the effects of feature fatigue on customer equity. Comput Math Organ Theory 21, 69–89 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-014-9177-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-014-9177-2