Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Modeling the span of control of leaders with different skill sets

  • Published:
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In leading a team doing routine engineering design, two orthogonal skill sets can be distinguished: domain-specific or technical skills, and interpersonal “managerial” skills which are more general. This paper presents a computational model of team performance that relates these two types of skills to the amount of managerial and communication work generated given a certain team size (i.e. span of control). This model can be used to derive the optimal managerial profile for any team size, or the optimal team size for the skill set of a specific manager, provided the nature of the work remains fixed. The analysis of the model reveals several interesting insights. First, managerial skills are found to increase team performance up to a point after which it starts to decrease again. Second, a manager needs to compensate for low domain knowledge with high people skills, so optimal managerial skill level increases with lower domain knowledge. Third, both abilities have a significant impact on the manager’s allocated time for his/her group; however, more influence is noticed for managerial skills. Finally, the manager was found to be more essential to large teams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Ashley S (1997) Keys to chryslers comeback. ASME Mech Eng Mag 119(11):88–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccarini D (1996) The concept of project complexity- a review. Int J Project Manag 14(4):201–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baiden BK, Price ADF (2011) The effect of integration on project delivery team effectiveness. Int J Project Manag 29(2):129–136. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey EE, Helfat CE (2003) External management succession, human capital, and firm performance: an integrative analysis. Manag Decis Econ 24(4):47–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batallas DA, Yassine AA (2006) Information leaders in product development organizational networks: social network analysis of the design structure matrix. Eng Manag IEEE Trans 53(4):570–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carindal LB, Sitikin SB, Long CP (2004) Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Org Sci 15(4):411–431. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang AST (2002) Reasons for cost and schedule increase for engineering design projects. J Manag Eng 18(1):29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng MY, Tsai MH, Xiao ZW (2006) Construction management process reengineering: organizational human resource planning for multiple projects. Autom Constr 15(6):785–799. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2005.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper R, Aouad G, Lee A, Wu S, Fleming A, Kagioglou M (2008) Process management in design and construction. Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Curral LA, Forrester RH, Dawson JF, West MA (2001) It’s what you do and the way that you do It: team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. Eur J Work Org Psychol 10(2):187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne SD, Yammarino FJ, Atwater LE, Spangler WD (2004) Transformational leadership and team performance. J Org Change Manag 17(2):177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppinger SD, Browning TR (2012) Design structure matrix methods and applications. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Yassine A, Yu TL (2004) Calculating efficient team size: balancing deciding and doing as an elementary optimization problem. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ASME design engineering technical conference, Salt Lake City, UT

  • Graen GB, Liden RC, Hoel W (1982) Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. J Appl Psychol 67(6):868–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graen GB, Scandura TA, Graen MR (1986) A field experimental test of the moderating effects of growth need strength on productivity. J Appl Psychol 71(3):484–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graicunas VA (1937) Relationship in organization. In: Gulick L, Urwick L (eds) Papers on the science of administration. Institute of Public Administration, New York, pp 183–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad C (1996) Operationalizing the concept of concurrent engineering: a case study from the US auto industry. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 43(2):124–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G (2011) First, let’s fire all the managers. Harv Bus Rev 89(12):48–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie R, Kameda T (2005) The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. Psychol Rev 112(2):494–508. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazy JK (2007) Computer models of leadership: foundations for a new discipline or meaningless diversion? Leadersh Q 18(4):391–410. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen DR, Hulin CL (2000) Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: the third scientific discipline. American Psychological Association, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen C, House RJ (2001) Dynamics of charismatic leadership: a process theory, simulation model, and tests. Leadersh Q 12(1):75–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones WL (1977) The construction manager at work - determining his roles, activities, and time allocation by structured observation. Master’s thesis, Civil Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Kacmar KM, Witt LA, Zivnuska S, Gully SM (2003) The interactive effect of LeaderMember exchange and communication the interactive effect of LeaderMember exchange and communication. J Appl Psychol 88(4):764–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenbach JR, Smith DK (1992) The wisdom of teams: creating the high-performance organization. Harvard University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA (1993) The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr NL, Tindale RS (2004) Group performance and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 55(1):623–655. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim B, Clark SCW (1992) Organizing and leading “heavyweight” development teams. Calif Manag Rev 34:9–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenke K (2008) Qualitative research in the study of leadership. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut RE, Streeter LA (1995) Coordination in software development. Commun ACM 38(3):69–81. doi:10.1145/203330.203345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin PR, Hatch EC, Silver JS, Boh L (2006) Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: effects of group size. J Personal Soc Psychol 90(4):644–651. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad Manag Rev 26(3):356–376. doi:10.5465/AMR.2001.4845785

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton B (1999) If it aint broke, fix it anyway: Communicating to create change at Ford. Harvard Business Case, http://www.thecasecentre.org/educators/products/view?id=43432

  • Millhiser WP, Coen CA, Solow D (2011) Understanding the role of worker interdependence in team selection. Org Sci 22(3):772–787. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1973) The nature of managerial work. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Muczyk JP, Reimann BC (1987) The case for directive leadership. Acad Manag Perspect 1(4):301–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasrallah W (2006) When does management matter in a dog-eat-dog world: an interaction value analysis model of organizational climate. Comput Math Org Theory 12(4):339–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilson GL, Wulf J (2012) How many direct reports? Harv Bus Rev 90(4):112–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC (2006) Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J Org Behav 27(7):941–966. doi:10.1002/job.413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norrgren F, Schaller J (1999) Leadership style: its impact on cross-functional product development. J Prod Innov Manag 16(4):377–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce CL, Gallagher CA, Ensley MD (2002) Confidence at the group level of analysis: a longitudinal investigation of the relationship between potency and team effectiveness. J Occup Org Psychol 75(1):115–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirola-Merlo A, Hartel C, Mann L, Hirst G (2002) How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams. Leadersh Q 13(5):561–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JB, Anderson P, Finkelstein S (1998) The strategic management of intellectual capital., hap 7—managing professional intellect: making the most of the bestButterworth-Heinemen, Oxford, pp 87–100

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse WB, Boff KR (2005) Organizational simulation. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sarin S, McDermott C (2003) The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Dec Sci 34(4):707–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer SJ (2011) Taking the reins: the effects of new leader status and leadership style on team performance. J Appl Psychol 96(3):574–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer S (2004) Software development teams. Commun ACM 47(12):95–99. doi:10.1145/1035134.1035140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scandura TA, Graen GB (1984) Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. J Appl Psychol 69(3):428–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtes PR (1998) The leader’s handbook: making things happen, getting things done. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber C, Carley KM (2006) Leadership style as an enabler of organizational complex functioning. Emergence 8:67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow D, Leenawong C (2003) Mathematical models for studying the value of cooperational leadership in team replacement. Comput Math Org Theory 9(1):61–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow D, Vairaktarakis G, Piderit SK, Mc Tsai (2002) Managerial insights into the effects of interactions on replacing members of a team. Manag Sci 48(8):1060–1073. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1060.164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow D, Piderit S, Burnetas A, Leenawong C (2005) Mathematical models for studying the value of motivational leadership in teams. Comput Math Org Theory 11(1):5–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasser G, Dietz-Uhler B (2001) Collective choice, judgment, and problem solving. In: Blackwell handbook of social psychology: group processes, WIley, Chichester, pp 31–55

  • Wheelan SA (2009) Group size, group development and group productivity. Small Group Res 40(2):247–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilemon D, Thamhain H (1983) Team building in project management. Project Manag Q 14(2):73–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler I (2009) Leader-member exchange theory., Contemporary leadership theoriesSpringer, Philadelphia, pp 47–53

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Engineering Management Program, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

    Walid F. Nasrallah, Charbel J. Ouba & Ali A. Yassine

  2. Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, The American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

    Issam M. Srour

Authors
  1. Walid F. Nasrallah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Charbel J. Ouba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ali A. Yassine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Issam M. Srour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walid F. Nasrallah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nasrallah, W.F., Ouba, C.J., Yassine, A.A. et al. Modeling the span of control of leaders with different skill sets. Comput Math Organ Theory 21, 296–317 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-015-9187-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-015-9187-8

Keywords