Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Applicability and effectiveness of classifications models for achieving the twin objectives of growth and outreach of microfinance institutions

  • Manuscript
  • Published:
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measuring performance of microfinance institutions (MFIs) is challenging as MFIs must achieve the twin objectives of outreach and sustainability. We propose a new measure to capture the performance of MFIs by placing their twin achievements in a 2 × 2 grid of a classification matrix. To make a dichotomous classification, MFIs that meet both their twin objectives are classified as ‘1’ and MFIs who could not meet their dual objectives simultaneously are designated as ‘0’. Six classifiers are applied to analyze the operating and financial characteristics of MFIs that can offer a predictive modeling solution in achieving their objectives and the results of the classifiers are comprehended using technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution to identify an appropriate classifier based on ranking of measures of performance. Out of six classifiers applied in the study, kernel lab-support vector machines achieved highest accuracy and lowest classification error rate that discriminates the best achievement of the MFIs’ twin objective. MFIs can use both these steps to identify whether they are on the right path to attaining their multiple objectives from their operating characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. Selected only 584 MFIs without missing information. This aspect might have some selection bias.

References

  • Agrawal VP, Kohli V, Gupta S (1991) Computer aided robot selection: the multiple attribute decision making approach. Int J Prod Res 29(8):1629–1644. doi:10.1080/00207549108948036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlin C, Lin J, Maio M (2011) Where does microfinance flourish? Microfinance institutions performance in macroeconomic context. J Dev Econ 95:105–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali S, Smith KA (2006) On learning algorithm selection for classification. Appl Soft Comput 6(2):119–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arun T, Murinde V (2010) Microfinance regulation and social protection. European Report on Development Policy

  • Austin PC, Tu JV, Ho JE, Levy D, Lee DS (2013) Using methods from the data-mining and machine-learning literature for disease classification and prediction: a case study examining classification of heart failure subtypes. J Clin Epidemiol 66(4):398–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrueta LA, Alonso-Salces RM, Héberger K (2007) Supervised pattern recognition in food analysis. J Chromatogr A 1158(1):196–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya S, Jha S, Tharakunnel K, Westland JC (2011) Data mining for credit card fraud: a comparative study. Decis Support Syst 50(3):602–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop CM (1996) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco A, Pino-MejíAs R, Lara J, Rayo S (2013) Credit scoring models for the microfinance industry using neural networks: evidence from Peru. Expert Syst Appl 40(1):356–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogan V (2012) Capital structure and sustainability: an empirical study of microfinance institutions. Rev Econ Stat 94(4):1045–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos JW, Millone M (2015) Practice what you preach: microfinance business models and operational efficiency. World Dev 70:28–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brau JC, Woller GM (2004) Microfinance: a comprehensive review of the existing literature. J Entrep Financ Bus Ventur 9(1):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazdil PB, Soares C (2000) A comparison of ranking methods for classification algorithm selection. In Machine learning: European conference on machine learning. Springer, Berlin, pp 63–75

  • Cao Q, Parry ME (2009) Neural network earnings per share forecasting models: a comparison of backward propagation and the genetic algorithm. Decis Support Syst 47(1):32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrizosa E, Martin-Barragan B, Morales DR (2010) Binarized support vector machines. INFORMS J Comput 22(1):154–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran G, Ramesh R (1987) Microcomputer based multiple criteria decision support system for strategic planning. Inf Manag 12(4):163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen MC (2007) Ranking discovered rules from data mining with multiple criteria by data envelopment analysis. Expert Syst Appl 33(4):1110–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YL, Cheng LC, Hsu WY (2013) A new approach to the group ranking problem: finding consensus ordered segments from users’ preference data. Decis Sci 44(6):1091–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng HD, Shi XJ, Min R, Hu LM, Cai XP, Du HN (2006) Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms. Pattern Recogn 39(4):646–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi DH, Ahn BS, Kim SH (2005) Prioritization of association rules in data mining: multiple criteria decision approach. Expert Syst Appl 29(4):867–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measur 20(1):37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins D, Morduch J, Rutherford S, Ruthven O (2009) Portfolios of the poor: how the world’s poor live on $2 a day. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Conning J (1999) Outreach, sustainability and leverage in monitored and peer-monitored lending. J Dev Econ 60(1):51–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copestake J (2007) Mainstreaming microfinance: social performance management or mission drift? World Dev 35(10):1721–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortez P (2010) Data mining with neural networks and support vector machines using the R/rminer tool. In Advances in data mining. Applications and theoretical aspects. Springer, Berlin, pp 572–583

  • Coussement K, Van den Poel D (2008) Churn prediction in subscription services: an application of support vector machines while comparing two parameter-selection techniques. Expert Syst Appl 34(1):313–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubiles-De-La-Vega MD, Blanco-Oliver A, Pino-Mejías R, Lara-Rubio J (2013) Improving the management of microfinance institutions by using credit scoring models based on Statistical Learning techniques. Expert Syst Appl 40(17):6910–6917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cull R, Morduch J (2007) Financial performance and outreach: a global analysis of leading microbanks. Econ J 117(517):F107–F133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cull R, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Morduch J (2009) Microfinance meets the market. J Econ Perspect 23(1):167–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Espallier B, Hudon M, Szafarz A (2013) Unsubsidized microfinance institutions. Econ Lett 120:174–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon WRG, Dillon MWR, Goldstein M (1984) Multivariate analysismethods and applications (No. 519.535 D5)

  • Dimitriadou E, Hornik K, Leisch F, Meyer D, Weingessel A (2005) Misc functions of the department of statistics (e1071), TU Wien

  • Doumpos M, Zopounidis C (2011) A multicriteria outranking modeling approach for credit rating. Decis Sci 42(3):721–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eom HB, Lee SM (1987) A large-scale goal programming model-based decision support for formulating global financing strategy. Inf Manag 12(1):33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 27(8):861–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferri C, Hernández-Orallo J, Modroiu R (2009) An experimental comparison of performance measures for classification. Pattern Recogn Lett 30(1):27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galar M, Fernández A, Barrenechea E, Bustince H, Herrera F (2011) An overview of ensemble methods for binary classifiers in multi-class problems: experimental study on one-vs-one and one-vs-all schemes. Pattern Recogn 44(8):1761–1776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez A (2007) Efficiency drivers of microfinance institutions (MFIs): the case of operating costs. Microbank Bull 15

  • Gutierrez-Nieto B, Serrano-Cinca C, Molinero CM (2007) Microfinance institutions and efficiency. Omega 35(2):131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand DJ (2005) Good practice in retail credit scorecard assessment. J Oper Res Soc 56(9):1109–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand DJ (2006) Classifier technology and the illusion of progress. Stat Sci 21(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartarska V, Nadolnyak D (2007) Do regulated microfinance institutions achieve better sustainability and outreach? Cross-country evidence. Appl Econ 39(10):1207–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2008) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haykin SS (2009) Neural networks and learning machines. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermes N, Lensink R, Meesters A (2011) Outreach and efficiency of microfinance institutions. World Dev 39(6):938–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirth RA (1999) Consumer information and competition between nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes. J Health Econ 18(2):219–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer Jr. DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2013) Applied logistic regression, vol 398. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA, Wichern DW (1988) Multivariate statistics, a practical approach. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston D, Morduch J (2008) The unbanked: evidence from Indonesia. World Bank Econ Rev 22(3):517–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim G, Park CS, Yoon KP (1997) Identifying investment opportunities for advanced manufacturing systems with comparative-integrated performance measurement. Int J Prod Econ 50(1):23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinde BA (2012) Financial sustainability of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in Ethiopia. Eur J Bus Manag 4(15):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiruthika, Dilsha M (2015) A neural network approach for microfinance credit scoring. J Stat Manag Syst 18(1–2):121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohavi R, Provost F (1998) Glossary of terms. Mach Learn 30(2–3):271–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Kou G, Peng Y, Lu C (2014) MCDM approach to evaluating bank loan default models. Technol Econ Dev Econ 20(2):292–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakdawalla D, Philipson T (2006) The nonprofit sector and industry performance. J Public Econ 90(89):1681–1698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledolter J (2013) Data mining and business analytics with R. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Ji L, Wang J (2014) A new MCDM method combining QFD with TOPSIS for knowledge management system selection from the user’s perspective in intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Appl Soft Comput 21:28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menard S (2009) Logistic regression: from introductory to advanced concepts and applications. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mersland R, Strøm RØ (2009) Performance and governance in microfinance institutions. J Bank Financ 33(4):662–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mersland R, Randøy T, Strøm RØ (2011) The impact of international influence on microbanks’ performance: a global survey. Int Bus Rev 20(2):163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morduch J (2000) The microfinance schism. World Dev 28(4):617–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa MM, El-Masry AA (2013) Citizens as consumers: profiling e-government services’ users in Egypt via data mining techniques. Int J Inf Manag 33(4):627–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngai EWT (2003) Selection of web sites for online advertising using the AHP. Inf Manag 40(4):233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson DL (2004) Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models. Math Comput Model 40(7):721–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):445–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng MW, Sun SL, Pinkham B, Chen H (2009) The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Acad Manag Perspect 23(3):63–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng Y, Wang G, Kou G, Shi Y (2011) An empirical study of classification algorithm evaluation for financial risk prediction. Appl Soft Comput 11(2):2906–2915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino-Mejías R, Cubiles-de-la-Vega MD, Anaya-Romero M, Pascual-Acosta A, Jordán-López A, Bellinfante-Crocci N (2010) Predicting the potential habitat of oaks with data mining models and the R system. Environ Model Softw 25(7):826–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravi V, Kurniawan H, Thai PNK, Kumar PR (2008) Soft computing system for bank performance prediction. Appl Soft Comput 8(1):305–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson MS (2001) The microfinance revolution: sustainable finance for the poor, vol 1. World Bank Publications, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher M, Roßner R, Vach W (1996) Neural networks and logistic regression: part I. Comput Stat Data Anal 21(6):661–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servin R, Lensink R, Van den Berg M (2012) Ownership and technical efficiency of microfinance institutions: empirical evidence from Latin America. J Bank Financ 36:2136–2144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw J (2004) Microenterprise occupation and poverty reduction in microfinance programs: evidence from Sri Lanka. World Dev 32(7):1247–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shmueli G, Patel NR, Bruce PC (2007) Data mining for business intelligence: concepts, techniques, and applications in Microsoft Office Excel with XLMiner. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SF (1983) Flexible learning of problem solving heuristics through adaptive search. IJCAI 83:422–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Tchuigoua HT (2014) Institutional framework and capital structure of microfinance institutions. J Bus Res 67(10):2185–2197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantaphyllou E, Sánchez A (1997) A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multicriteria decision making methods. Decis Sci 28(1):151–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanroose A, D’Espallier B (2013) Do microfinance institutions accomplish their mission? Evidence from the relationship between traditional financial sector development and microfinance institutions’ outreach and performance. Appl Econ 45:1965–1982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik V, Guyon I, Hastie T (1995) Support vector machines. 2010-01-10. http://www.support-vector-machines.org Accessed 13 Jan 2016

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Zhu Z, Huang S (2014) The use of improved TOPSIS method based on experimental design and Chebyshev regression in solving MCDM problems. J Intell Manuf pp 1–15

  • Wong BK, Selvi Y (1998) Neural network applications in finance: a review and analysis of literature (1990–1996). Inf Manag 34(3):129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu TF, Lin CJ, Weng RC (2004) Probability estimates for multi-class classification by pairwise coupling. J Mach Learning Res 5:975–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu CR (2008) Data analysis for microarray experiment and DNA barcode of life. ProQuest

  • Zanakis SH, Solomon A, Wishart N, Dublish S (1998) Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods. Eur J Oper Res 107(3):507–529. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong H, Miao C, Shen Z, Feng Y (2014) Comparing the learning effectiveness of BP, ELM, I-ELM, and SVM for corporate credit ratings. Neurocomputing 128:285–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu G, Huang D, Zhang P, Ban W (2015) ε-Proximal support vector machine for binary classification and its application in vehicle recognition. Neurocomputing 161(2015):260–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information Technology Area, Indian Institute of Management Raipur, GEC Campus, Sejbahar, Raipur, 492015, India

    Manojit Chattopadhyay

  2. Finance Area, Indian Institute of Management Raipur, GEC Campus, Sejbahar, Raipur, 492015, India

    Subrata Kumar Mitra

Authors
  1. Manojit Chattopadhyay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Subrata Kumar Mitra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manojit Chattopadhyay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chattopadhyay, M., Mitra, S.K. Applicability and effectiveness of classifications models for achieving the twin objectives of growth and outreach of microfinance institutions. Comput Math Organ Theory 23, 451–474 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-016-9237-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-016-9237-x

Keywords