Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

The meso-unit theory of post-merger integration

  • Manuscript
  • Published:
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This article introduces the meso-unit theory of post-merger integration. The theory offers that the number of constituent work-units involved in an organizational merger has a greater detrimental effect on the time-to-integration than does the total number of constituent personnel involved. Its establishment is based on the results of controlled experiments conducted in a virtual laboratory. The simulation utilizes agent-based modeling software that encapsulates organizational behavior models such as the knowledge-based view of the firm, social and communication network theory, and CONSTRUCT theory. The software is configured for a two-organization merger and implements classic behavior dynamics to simulate communicative behavior of information-seeking actors. As a result, detailed micro- and macro-level data on the integration progress is available for examination, analysis and interpretation. The results give rise to the development of the meso-unit theory, which directs integration managers’ attention toward a key aspect of the integration that is often overlooked.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Allen P, Ramlogan R, Randles S (2002) Complex systems and the merger process. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 14(3):315–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R (1986) An evolutionary approach to norms. Am Polit Sci Rev 80(4):1095–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backström T, Döös M (2008) Relatonics as a key concept for networked organizations. In: Putnik GD, Cunha MM (eds) Encyclopedia of networked and virtual organizations, vol 3. Idea Group Inc, Hershey, pp 1367–1374

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blau PM (1970) A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. Am Sociol Rev 35(2):201–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer H (1969) Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner RF (2005) Deals from Hell: M&A lessons that rise above the ashes. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson J (2003) Managing HRM risk in a merger. Empl Relat 25(1):14–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capron L, Mitchell W (2013) Build, borrow, or buy: solving the growth dilemma. Harvard Business Press, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley KM (1986) Knowledge acquisition as a social phenomenon. Instr Sci 14:381–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley KM (1990) Group stability: a socio-cognitive approach. In: Lawler E, Markovsky B, Ridgeway C, Walker H (eds) Advances in group processes: theory and research, vol 7. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 1–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley KM (2002) Smart agents and organizations of the future. In: Lievrouw LA, Livingstone S (eds) The handbook of new media social shaping and consequences of ICTS. Thousand Oaks, Sage, pp 206–220

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carley KM (2003) Dynamic network analysis. In: Breiger R, Carley KM, Pattison P (eds) Dynamic social network modeling and analysis: workshop summary and papers. National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp 133–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert RM, March JG (1992) A behavioral theory of the firm, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley KJ, Corman SR, McPhee RD, Kuhn T (2003) Modeling high-resolution broadband discourse in complex adaptive systems. Nonlinear Dyn Psychol Life Sci 7(1):61–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frantz TL, Carley K (2009) Computationally modeling the effect of organizational complexity on post-merger integration. Adv Mergers Acquis 8:79–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison J (2007) Why integration success eludes many buyers. Mergers Acquis J 42(3):18–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Hviid M, Prendergast C (1993) Merger failure and merger profitability. J Ind Econ 41:371–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt D, Carley KM (1998) PCANS model of structure in organizations. In: Proceedings of the 1998 international symposium on command and control research and technology, June, Monterrey. Evidence Based Research, Vienna, pp. 113–119

  • Lauser B (2010) Post-merger integration and change processes from a complexity perspective. Baltic J Manag 5(1):6–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B-W, Hung S-C, Li P-C (2006) Mergers and acquisitions as a human resource strategy: evidence from US banking firms. Int J Manpow 27(2):126–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks ML, Mirvis PH (2001) Making mergers and acquisitions work: strategic and psychological preparation. Acad Manag Exec 15(2):80–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitleton-Kelly E, Mitleton E (2005) Co-evolutionary integration: a complexity perspective on mergers & acquisitions. LSE complexity research programme. http://www.psych.lse.ac.uk/complexity/Publications/icosspublications.html

  • Porter ME (1987) From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harv Bus Rev 65(3):43–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice RE, Aydin C (1991) Attitudes toward new organizational technology: network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Adm Sci Q 2:219–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salancik GR, Pfeffer J (1978) A social information professing approach to job attitudes and task design. Adm Sci Q 23:224–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger DM, DeNisi AS (1991) Communication with employees following a merger: a longitudinal field experiment. Acad Manag J 34(1):110–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1957) Models of man: social and rational; mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker S (1980) Symbolic interactionism: a social structural version. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H (1996) The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach. Strateg Manag J 17(S2):11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Peking University HSBC Business School, Shenzhen, China

    Terrill L. Frantz

Authors
  1. Terrill L. Frantz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terrill L. Frantz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frantz, T.L. The meso-unit theory of post-merger integration. Comput Math Organ Theory 24, 99–111 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-017-9248-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-017-9248-2

Keywords