Abstract
We view supply chains as a type of complex adaptive system and develop an agent based computer simulation model of the evolution and performance of supply chains based on Stuart Kauffman’s NK models of fitness landscapes. Firms operate in networks in which they supply products to some firms and source inputs from others. They seek to maximize their own performance but they cooperate with other firms to gain access to inputs. We model firm performance in terms of the fit of its product with market demand and the contribution from first tier suppliers. The model uses genetic algorithms to mimic the way firms learn and adapt their products and supplier networks for more and less complex products and different switching conditions. We find that (a) as the complexity of the product increases, firms perform less well; and (b) firms build supplier networks with higher average in-degree, greater density, and significantly greater clustering to cope with product complexity. Our findings suggest that firms using highly specific assets or that face high switching costs are likely to pursue a supplier strategy that relies more on multiple suppliers and more clustered supply networks. Also, in industries characterized by highly specialized training, plants and machinery dedicated to specific products and other high product-specific transaction costs, we should observe more specialization at low levels of product complexity but less at high levels. The model contributes to our understanding of the evolution of supply networks, which is an under-researched topic, provides the basis for further extensions of the model and the development of more realistic models of actual supply chains. The model also provides a conceptual and methodological tool to assist firms and policymakers to better understanding the nature of supply chains and to identify and test strategies and policies.


Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Allen P, Maguire S, McKelvey B (eds) (2011) Complexity and management. Los Angeles, Sage
Altiparmak F, Gen M, Lin L, Paksoy T (2006) A genetic algorithm approach for multi-objective optimization of supply chain networks. Comput Ind Eng 51(1):196–215
Anderson JC, Håkan H, Jan J (1994) Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. J Mark 58:1–15
Axelsson B, Easton G (eds) (1992) Industrial networks - a new view of reality. London, Routledge
Axtell R, Axelrod R, Epstein JM, Cohen MD (1996) Aligning simulation models: a case study and results. Comput Math Organ Theory 1(2):123–141
Barber M (2011). The Big ready: commercial airplanes embarks on epic rate increase. Boeing Frontiers, 38. http://www.boeing.com/news/frontiers/archive/2011/august/
Behdani B, van Dam KH, Lukszo Z (2013) Agent-based models of supply chains. In: van Dam KH, Nikolic I, Lukszo Z (eds) Agent-based modelling of socio-technical systems, vol 9. Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht, pp 151–180
Blume LE, Durlach SN (2006) The economy as a complex evolving system, III. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Carter CR, Leuschner R, Rogers DS (2007) A social network analysis of the journal of supply chain management: knowledge generation, knowledge diffusion and thought leadership. J Supply Chain Manag 43(2):15–28
Chen X, Ong YS, Tan PS, Zhang N, Li Z (2013). Agent-based modeling and simulation for supply chain risk management—a survey of the state-of-the-art. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, IEEE International Conference, pp 1294–1299
Choi TY, Dooley KJ et al (2001) Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: control versus emergence. J Oper Manag 19(3):351–366
Dixon DF, Wilkinson IF (1986) Toward a theory of channel structure. Res Mark 8:27–70
Easton G, Brooks RJ, Georgiova K, Wilkinson IF (2008) Understanding the dynamics of industrial networks using Kauffman Boolean networks. Adv Complex Syst 11(1):139–164
Epstein JM (2006) Generative social science: studies in agent-based computational modeling. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Gates D (2011). Boeing’s tab for the 787: $32 billion and counting. Seattle Times, 25 September, A14
Gilbert N (2008) Agent-based models. Sage, Los Angeles
Gilbert GN (ed) (2010) Computational social science, vol 21. Sage, London
Grimm V, Berger U, DeAngelis DL, Polhill JG, Giske J, Railsback SF (2010) The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecol Model 221(23):2760–2768
Holland JH (1992) Genetic algorithms. Sci Am 267:66–72
Holland JH (2014) Complexity: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, New York
Kauffman SA (1993) The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, New York
Kauffman SA (1995) At home in the universe: the search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford University Press, New York
Labarthe O, Espinasse B, Ferrarini A, Montreuil B (2007) Toward a methodological framework for agent-based modelling and simulation of supply chains in a mass customization context. Simul Model Pract Theory 15(2):113–136
Leombruni R, Richiardi M (2005) Why are economists skeptical about agent-based simulations? Phys A 355(1):103–109
Lunsford JL (2008). Fastener woes to delay flight of first boeing 787 jets. Wall Street J, 5 November, B1
Lunsford JL, Glader P (2007). Boeing’s nuts-and-bolts problem: shortage of fasteners tests ability to finish dreamliners. Wall Street J, 19 June, A8
Macy MW, Willer R (2002) From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annu Rev Sociol 28:143–166
Marks RE (2007) Validating simulation models: a general framework and four applied examples. Comput Econ 30(3):265–290
Matous P, Todo Y (2015) Dissolve the Keiretsu, or die: a longitudinal study of disintermediation in the Japanese automobile manufacturing supply networks. The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry 15-E-039, Tokyo, pp 1–24
Matous P, Todo Y (2016) Energy and resilience: the effects of endogenous interdependencies on trade network formation across space among major Japanese firms. Netw Sci 4(2):141–163
McKelvey W (1999) Avoiding complexity catastrophe in coevolutionary pockets: strategies for rugged landscapes. Organ Sci 10(3):294–321
Mecham M (2008) Integration troubles: boeing learns not all suppliers can play crucial assembly role. Aviat Week Space Technol 168(14):26
Meixell MJ, Gargeya VB (2005) Global supply chain design: a literature review and critique. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 41(6):531–559
Miller JH, Page SE (2007) Complex adaptive systems: an introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Mitchell M (1998) An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge
Mizuno T, Souma W, Watanabe T (2014) The structure and evolution of buyer–supplier networks. PLoS ONE 9(7):e100712
Moss S, Edmonds B (2005) Sociology and simulation: statistical and quantitative cross-validation. Am J Sociol 110(4):1095–1131
Pathak SD, Day JM et al (2007) Complexity and adaptivity in supply networks: building supply network theory using a complex adaptive systems perspective. Decis Sci 38(4):547–580
Ritter T, Wilkinson IF, Johnston WJ (2004) Firms’ ability to manage in business networks: a review of concepts. Ind Mark Manag 33(3):175–183
Sanders, P. (2009). Boeing Sets Deal to Buy a Dreamliner Plant. Wall Street Journal, 8 July, B3
Seibel F, Kellam L (2003) The virtual world of agent-based modeling: proctor & Gamble’s dynamic supply chain. Perspect Bus Innov 9:22–27
Surana, A, Kumara, S, Greaves, M, Raghavan, UN (2005) Supply-chain networks: a complex adaptive systems perspective. Int J Prod Res 43(20):4235–4265
Tesfatsion L (2006) Agent-based computational economics: a constructive approach to economic theory. In: Tesfatsion L, Judd KL (eds) Handbook of computational economics, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 831–880
Troitzsch KG (2004) Validating simulation models. Proceedings of the 18th simulation multiconference, Society for Modeling & Simulation International, Erlangen, Germany
Vidgen R, Bull L (2011) Applications of Kauffman’s coevolutionary NKCS model to management and organization studies. In: Allen P, Maguire S, McKelvey B (eds) The Sage handbook of complexity and management, Sage Publications, Los Angeles, pp 201–218
Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York
Watts DJ (1999) Small worlds: the dynamics between order and randomness. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics in ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393:440–442
White HC (2002) Markets from networks: socioeconomic models of production. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Wilkinson IF (2001) A history of channels and network thinking in marketing in the 20th century. Australas Mark J 9(2):23–53
Wilkinson IF (2008) Business relating business: managing organisational relations and Networks. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Wilkinson IF, Young L (2013) The past and the future of business marketing theory. Ind Mark Manag 42(3):394–404
Windrum P, Fagiolo G, Moneta A (2007) Empirical validation of agent-based models: alternatives and prospects. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 10(2):8. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/10/2/8.html
Yuan Y, McKelvey B (2004) Situated learning theory: adding rate and complexity effects via Kauffman’s NK model. Nonlinear Dynam Psychol Life Sci 8(1):65–101
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Earnest, D.C., Wilkinson, I.F. An agent based model of the evolution of supplier networks. Comput Math Organ Theory 24, 112–144 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-017-9249-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-017-9249-1