Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Applications of agent-based modeling and simulation in organization management: a quarter-century review through bibliometric mapping (1998–2022)

  • Manuscript
  • Published:
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to review existing research on organization management that applied agent-based modeling and simulation (ABMS). First, we systematically identified 133 relevant articles published between 1998 and 2022 using the Web of Science (WoS) and EBSCOhost database. Second, we analyzed the characteristics of ABMS reported in the 133 articles. The results illustrated that the focal articles made extensive use of ABMS as a means of theory development and the enhancement of transparency was demanded. Third, we used a bibliometric mapping approach to analyze the 133 articles visually. The results identified 36 key terms and four clusters: team behaviors under complex environments, organizational structure and design, knowledge management in organizations, and organizational decision-making. The analysis also showed which key terms are used as research fronts and which terms are emerging. Lastly, we suggest five promising research opportunities that should either be continued or be addressed in organization management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abar S, Theodoropoulos GK, Lemarinier P, O’Hare GMP (2017) Agent based modelling and simulation tools: a review of the state-of-art software. Comput Sci Rev 24:13–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Academy of Management (2022) Divisions and interest groups. https://aom.org/network/divisions-interest-groups-(digs). Accessed 1 May 2022

  • Aguinis H, Ramani RS, Alabduljader N (2018) What you see is what you get? Enhancing methodological transparency in management research. Acad Manag Ann 12(1):83–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • alazzolo ET, Serb DA, She Y, Su C, Contractor NS (2006) Coevolution of communication and knowledge networks in transactive memory systems: using computational models for theoretical development. Commun Theory 16(2):223–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen N (2021) Mapping the expatriate literature: a bibliometric review of the field from 1998 to 2017 and identification of current research fronts. Int J Hum Resour Manag 32(22):4687–4724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrieta JP (2020) Sometimes more: The effect of preference diversity on exploration. Acad Manag Ann M Proc 2020(1)

  • Ávila-Robinson A, Wakabayashi N (2018) Changes in the structures and directions of destination management and marketing research: a bibliometric mapping study, 2005–2016. J Dest Mark Manage 10:101–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R (1997) Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. In: Conte R, Hegselmann R, Terna P (eds) Simulating social phenomena. SpringerVerlag, Berlin, pp 21–40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bae J, Koo J (2008) Information loss, knowledge transfer cost and the value of social relations. Strateg Organ 6(3):227–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajracharya K, Duboz R (2013) Comparison of three agent-based platforms on the basis of a simple epidemiological model (WIP). Proc Symp Theory Model Sim 7:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann O, Srikanth K, Ungureanu TS (2021) Resource allocation as a hierarchical learning process. Acad Manag Ann M Proc 2021(1)

  • Billari FC, Fent T, Prskawetz A, Scheffran J (eds) (2006) Agent-based computational modelling: applications in demography, social, economic and environmental sciences. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau E (2002) Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 99 (suppl 3), pp 7280–7287

  • Byington E, Felps W, Baruch Y (2018) Mapping the Journal of Vocational Behavior: a 23-year review. J Vocat Behav

  • Callon M, Courtial JP, Turner WA, Bauin S (1983) From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Soc Sci Inf 22(2):191–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Careky KM, Svoboda DM (1996) Modeling organizational adaptation as a simulated annealing process. Soc Met Res 25(1):138–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carraro M, Furlan A (2021) Shared or divergent mental models? The role of key employees in problem solving. Acad Manag Ann M Proc 2021(1)

  • Chandrasekaran A, Linderman K, Sting FJ, Benner MJ (2016) Managing R&D project shifts in high-tech organizations: a multi‐method study. Prod Oper Manag 25(3):390–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera‐Viedma E, Herrera F (2011) Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec 62(7):1382–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin MA, Weingart LR, Todorova G (2011) Dynamics in groups: are we there yet? Acad Manag Ann 5(1):571–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad Manage Rev 32(2):480–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne SD, Sayama H, Hao C, Bush BJ (2010) The role of leadership in shared mental model convergence and team performance improvement: an agent-based computational model. Leadersh Q 21(6):1035–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong JM, Liu RJ, Qiu Y, Crossan M (2021) Should knowledge be distorted? Managers’ knowledge distortion strategies and organizational learning in different environments. Lea Qua 32(3):101477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein JM (1999) Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity 4(5):41–60

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fioretti G (2013) Agent-based simulation models in organization science. Organ Res Methods 16(2):227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ (2011) Why micro-foundations for resource-based theory are needed and what they may look like. 37(5):1413–1428

  • Gao D, Deng X, Bai B (2014) The emergence of organizational routines from habitual behaviours of multiple actors: an agent-based simulation study. J Sim 8(3):215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Cruz NA, Loaiza Saa I, Ortega Hurtado FF (2017) Agent-based simulation in management and organizational studies: a survey. Eur J Manag Bus Econ 26(3):313–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grand JA, Braun MT, Kuljanin G, Kozlowski SW, Chao GT (2016) The dynamics of team cognition: a process-oriented theory of knowledge emergence in teams. J Appl Psychol 101(10):1353–1385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm V, Berger U, Bastiansen F, Eliassen S, Ginot V, Giske J, Goss-Custard J, Grand T, Heinz SK, Huse G, Huth A, Jepsen JU, Jørgensen C, Mooij WM, Müller B, Pe’er G, Piou C, Railsback SF, Robbins AM, DeAngelis DL (2006) A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecol Mod 198(1–2):115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm V, Berger U, DeAngelis DL, Polhill JG, Giske J, Railsback SF (2010) The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecol Model 221(23):2760–2768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakrama I, Frasheri N (2016) A comparison between two simulations based on agent-based methods NetLogo vs Jason. Int J Sci Inn N Tec 1:31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Halaška M, Šperka R (2018) Is there a need for agent-based modelling and simulation in business process management? Organizacija 51(4):255–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison JR, Lin Z, Carroll GR, Carley KM (2007) Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Acad Manage Rev 32(4):1229–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz SK, Horwitz IB (2007) The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: a meta-analytic review of team demography. J Manag 33(6):987–1015

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu SC, Weng KW, Cui QB, Rand W (2016) Understanding the complexity of project team member selection through agent-based modeling. Int J Pro Manag 34(1):82–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huget MP (2002) Agent UML class diagrams revisited. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2592:49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes HP, Clegg CW, Robinson MA, Crowder RM (2012) Agent-based modelling and simulation: the potential contribution to organizational psychology. J Occup Organ Psychol 85(3):487–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey SE, Aime F (2014) Team microdynamics: toward an organizing approach to teamwork. Acad Manag Ann 8(1):443–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidnezhad B, Carley KM (2015) Agent-based modelling of quality management effects on organizational productivity. J Sim 9(1):73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen MA, Alessa LN, Barton M, Bergin S, Lee A (2008) Towards a community framework for agent-based modelling. J Art Soc Soc Sim 11(2)

  • Jehn KA, Mannix EA (2001) The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad Manag Ann 44(2):238–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA (1993) The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kiel LD, McCaskill J (2013) Cognition and complexity: an agent-based model of cognitive capital under stress. In: Kiel LD, J McCaskill (ed) Chaos and complexity theory for management: nonlinear daynamics. IGI Global, Pennsylvania, pp 254–268

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Shim J (2017) Agent-based simulation in strategic HRM research: the case of sorting effect. Acad Manag Ann M Proc 2017(1)

  • Knudsen T, Srikanth K (2014) Coordinated exploration: organizing joint search by multiple specialists to overcome mutual confusion and joint myopia. Adm Sci Q 59(3):409–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B, Colomer J, Belinky M (2014) Structural equality at the top of the corporation: mandated quotas for women directors. Strateg Manag J 35(6):891–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski SWJ (2012) Groups and teams in organizations: studying the multilevel dynamics of emergence. In: Hollingshead AB, Poole MS (eds) Methods for studying small groups: a behind-the-scenes guide. Routledge, New York, pp 260–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski SWJ (2015) Advancing research on team process dynamics: theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organ Psychol Rev 5(4):270–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski SWJ, Chao GT (2012) The dynamics of emergence: cognition and cohesion in work teams. Manage Decis Econ 33(5–6):335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski SWJ, Klein KJ (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In: Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ (eds) Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 3–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski SWJ, Chao GT, Grand JA, Braun MT, Kuljanin G (2013) Advancing multilevel research design: capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organ Res Methods 16(4):581–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee I, Chhajed D (1998) A computational model for product development organizations: Integration of distributed AI and organization theory. AMCIS Proc: pp.171–173

  • Levine SS, Prietula MJ (2012) How knowledge transfer impacts performance: a multilevel model of benefits and liabilities. Organ Sci 23(6):1748–1766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macal CM, North MJ (2009) Agent-based modeling and simulation. Proc 2009 Win Sim Conf : 86–98

  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Markoulli MP, Lee CISG, Byington E, Felps WA (2017) Mapping human resource management: reviewing the field and charting future directions. Hum Resour Manag Rev 27(3):367–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Martel RF, Emrich CG, Robison-Cox J (2012) From bias to exclusion: a multilevel emergent theory of gender segregation in organizations. Res Organ Behav 32:137–162

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh KA, Yammarino FJ, Dionne SD, Serban A, Sayama H, Chatterjee S (2016) Collective decision making, leadership, and collective intelligence: tests with agent-based simulations and a field study. Lea Qua 27(2):218–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meluso J, Hébert-Dufresne L, Bagrow J, Razzante R (2021) Masculinity contest cultures and inclusive cultures: insights from an agent-based model. Acad Manag Ann M Proc 2021(1)

  • Miller KD, Zhao M, Calantone RJ (2006) Adding interpersonal learning and tacit knowledge to March’s exploration-exploitation model. Acad Manag Ann 49(4):709–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller KD, Pentland BT, Choi S (2012) Dynamics of performing and remembering organizational routines. J Manag Stud 49(8):1536–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minar N, Burkhart R, Langton C, Askenazi M (1996) The swarm simulation system: a toolkit for building multi-agent simulations (Working Paper No. 96-06-042). Santa Fe Institute website. https://www.santafe.edu/research/results/working-papers/the-swarm-simulation-system-a-toolkit-for-building. Accessed 20 December 2019

  • Mizgier KJ, Wagner SM, Holyst JA (2012) Modeling defaults of companies in multi-stage supply chain networks. Int J Prod Econ 135(1):14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman DA, Harrison DA, Carpenter NC, Rariden SM (2016) Construct mixology: forming new management constructs by combining old ones. Acad Manag Ann 10(1):943–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North M, Collier N, Vos J (2006) Experiences creating three implementations of the repast agent modeling toolkit. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul 16(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raveendran M, PuranamP, Warglien M (2022) Division of labor through self-selection. Org Sci 33(2):810–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Manage Sci 49(3):290–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2006) Organizing to strategize in the face of interactions: preventing premature lock-in. Long Range Plann 39(6):591–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins SP, Judge TA (2013) Organizational behavior, 15th edn. Pearson, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins SP, Mary C (2012) Management, 11th edn. Pearson, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha Á, Gonçalves MJA, da Silva AF, Teixeira S, Silva R (2021) Leadership challenges in the context of university 4.0. A thematic synthesis literature review. Comput Math Organ Theory

  • Sabzian H, Shafia MA, Naeini AB, Jandaghi G, Sheikh MJ (2018) A review of agent-based modeling (ABM) concepts and some of its main applications in management science. Iran J Manag Stud 11(4):659–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Saenz-Royo C, Salas-Fumas V, Lozano-Rojo A (2022) Authority and consensus in group decision making with fallible individuals. Dec Sup Sys 153:113670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serban A, Yammarino FJ, Dionne SD et al (2015) Leadership emergence in face-to-face and virtual teams: a multi-level model with agent-based simulations, quasi-experimental and experimental tests. Leadersh Q 26(3):402–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA (2003) Temporarily divide to conquer: centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ Sci 14(6):650–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2005) Speed and search: designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ Sci 16(2):101–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2006) When exploration backfires: unintended consequences of multilevel organizational search. Acad Manag Ann 49(4):779–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc Am Philos Soc 106:467–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith ER, Conrey FR (2007) Agent-based modeling: a new approach for theory building in social psychology. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 11(1):87–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarakci M, Greer LL, Groenen PJ (2016) When does power disparity help or hurt group performance? J Appl Psychol 101(3):415–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner SF, Cardinal LB, Burton RM (2017) Research design for mixed methods: a triangulation-based framework and roadmap. Organ Res Methods 20(2):243–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uli V (2015) A multi-level co-evolutionary perspective on organizational learning. Evidence from the service industry. IFKAD 2015: Proceedings of the 10th International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics: 1642–1653

  • van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2009) Software survey: vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2):523–538

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wall F (2016) Agent-based modeling in managerial: an illustrative survey and study. Rev Manag Sci 10(1):135–193

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Waltman L, van Eck NJ (2013) A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection. Eur Phys J B 86(1):14

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltman L, van Eck NJ, Noyons ECM (2010) A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. J Informetr 4(4):629–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Gwebu K, Shanker M, Troutt MD (2009) An application of agent-based simulation to knowledge sharing. Decis Support Syst 46(2):532–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky U (1999) NetLogo. Northwestern University, Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Evanston, IL. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo Accessed 1 June 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu JY, Sekiguchi T (2019) A multilevel and dynamic model of intragroup conflict and decision making: application of agent-based modeling. Front Bus Res Chi 13(1):22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JY, Sekiguchi T (in press) Understanding organizational performance in dynamic environments: An integrative framework of activity-system maps and the NK model Acad Manag Lea Edu

  • Wu DD, Xie KF, Hua L, Shi Z, Olson DL (2010) Modeling technological innovation risks of an entrepreneurial team using system dynamics: an agent-based perspective. Tech Forec Soc Chang 77(6):857–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang HL, Wu TCT (2008) Knowledge sharing in an organization. Technol Forecast Soc Change 75(8):1128–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang MM, Chen HH, Lyytinen K (2021) Validating the coevolutionary principles of business and IS alignment via agent-based modeling. Europ J Inf Sys 30(5):496–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao N, Chong HY, Li Q (2022) Agent-based modelling of helping behaviour diffusion in project teams as an evolutionary process. J Sim

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 19K21692.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Head of Siemens P&O TL AA, No.7, Wangjing Zhonghuan Nanlu. Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100102, China

    Jiunyan Wu

  2. Doctoral Student, Raymond J. Harbert College of Business, Auburn University, 459 W. Magnolia Ave., Lowder Hall Auburn, AL, 36849, USA

    Takaki Ohya

  3. Graduate School of Management, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan

    Tomoki Sekiguchi

Authors
  1. Jiunyan Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takaki Ohya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tomoki Sekiguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiunyan Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, J., Ohya, T. & Sekiguchi, T. Applications of agent-based modeling and simulation in organization management: a quarter-century review through bibliometric mapping (1998–2022). Comput Math Organ Theory 30, 1–31 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-023-09381-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-023-09381-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation