Skip to main content
Log in

Stochastic programming for nurse assignment

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a brief overview of four phases of nurse planning. For the last phase, which assigns nurses to patients, a stochastic integer programming model is developed. A Benders’ decomposition approach is proposed to solve this problem, and a greedy algorithm is employed to solve the recourse subproblem. To improve the efficiency of the algorithm, we introduce sets of valid inequalities to strengthen a relaxed master problem. Computational results are provided based upon data from Baylor Regional Medical Center in Grapevine, Texas. Finally, areas of future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AARP: A profile of older Americans: 2000. http://research.aarp.org/general/profile_2000.pdf (2000)

  2. Aickelin, U., Dowsland, K.A.: An indirect genetic algorithm for a nurse scheduling problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 31(5), 761–778 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aickelin, U., White, P.: Building better nurse scheduling algorithms. Ann. Oper. Res. 128, 159–177 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey, R.N., Garner, K.M., Hobbs, M.F.: Using simulated annealing and genetic algorithms to solve staff scheduling problems. Asia-Pac. J. Oper. Res. 14(2), 27–43 (1997)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bard, J.F., Purnomo, H.W.: Hospital-wide reactive scheduling of nurses with preference considerations. IIE Trans. 35, 589–608 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Birge, J.R., Louveaux, F.: Introduction to Stochastic Programming. Springer, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Buerhaus, P.I., Staiger, D.O., Auerbach, D.I.: Implications of an aging registered nurse workforce. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 283(22), 2948–2954 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burke, E.K., Causmaecker, P.D., Berghe, G.V., Landeghem, H.V.: The state of the art of nurse rostering. J. Sched. 7(6), 441–499 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Burke, E.K., Causmaecker, P.D., Petrovic, S., Berghe, G.V.: Variable neighbourhood search for nurse rostering problems. In: Proceedings of the 4th Metaheuristics International Conference, Porto, Portugal, pp. 755–760 (2001)

  10. Burke, E.K., Cowling, P., Caumaecker, P.D., Berghe, G.V.: A memetic approach to the nurse rostering problem. Appl. Intell. (Special issue on Simulated Evolution and Learning) 15(3), 199–214 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. California Department of Health Services. State health director announces proposed changes to nurse-to-patient ratio regulations. http://www.applications.dhs.ca.gov/pressreleases/store/PressReleases/04-70.html (November 2004)

  12. Caroe, C.C., Tind, J.: L-shaped decomposition of two-stage stochastic programs with integer recourse. Math. Program. 83(3), 451–464 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheang, B., Li, H., Lim, A., Rodrigues, B.: Nurse rostering problems-a bibliographic survey. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 151(3), 447–460 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Chun, A.H.W., Chan, S.H.C., Lam, G.P.S., Tsang, F.M.F., Wong, J., Yeung, D.W.M.: Nurse rostering at the hospital authority of Hong Kong. In: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Austin, TX, 2000

  15. Jaumard, B., Semet, F., Vovor, T.: A generalized linear programming model for nurse scheduling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 107(1), 1–18 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kao, E.P.C., Queyranne, M.: Budgeting costs of nursing in a hospital. Manag. Sci. 31(5), 608–621 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kirkby, M.P.: Moving to computerized schedules: A smooth transition. Nurse Manag. 28(8), 42–44 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lynn, G.: The nursing shortage: Causes, impact and innovative remedies. Testimony of the American Hospital Association before the United State House of Representatives Committee on Education and the Workforce. http://edworkforce.house.gov/hearings/107th/fc/nurses92501/lynn.htm (2001)

  19. Miller, H.E., Pierskalla, W.P., Rath, G.J.: Nurse scheduling using mathematical programming. Oper. Res. 24(5), 857–870 (1976)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Mullinax, C., Lawley, M.: Assigning patients to nurses in neonatal intensive care. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 53(1), 25–35 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Office, G.A.: Nursing workforce: Emerging nurse shortage due to multiple factors. Technical report GAO-01-944, General Accounting Office, Washington, DC (2001)

  22. Overfelt, F.: Nursing ratios—are they good or bad? In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Society for Health Systems Management Engineering Forum, Orlando, FL, 2004

  23. Powers, J.: Accepting and refusing assignments. Nurs. Manag. 24(9), 64–73 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shaha, S., Bush, C.: Fixing acuity: a professional approach to patient classification and staffing. Nurs. Econ. 14, 346–356 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sherali, H.D., Smith, J.C.: Improving discrete model representations via symmetry considerations. Manag. Sci. 47(10), 1396–1407 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Siferd, S.P., Benton, W.C.: A decision modes for shift scheduling of nurses. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 74(3), 519–527 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith, J.C., Schaefer, A.J., Yen, J.W.: A stochastic integer programming approach to solving a synchronous optical network ring design problem. Networks 44(1), 12–26 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Stanton, M., Rutherford, M.K.: Hospital nurse staffing and quality of care. Research in Action Issue 14 04-0029, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (March 2004)

  29. Sundaramoorthi, D., Chen, V.C.P., Rosenberger, J.M.: Knowledge discovery and mining for nurse activity and patient data. In: Proceedings of IIE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA (2005)

  30. The Kaiser Family Foundation and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Harvard School of Public Health. National survey on consumers experiences with patient safety and quality information. http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/7209.cfm (November 2004)

  31. Trivedi, V.M.: Mixed-integer goal programming model for nursing service budgeting. Oper. Res. 29(5), 1019–1034 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Victor, C.R., Higginson, I.: Effectiveness of care for older people: a review. Qual. Heal. Care 3, 210–216 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Walts, L., Kapadia, A.: Patient classification system: an optimization approach. Heal. Care Manag. Rev. 21, 75–82 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Warner, D.M.: Forecasting the demand for nursing personnel and its optimal scheduling by ward. In: Proceedings of a Conference on Manpower Planning Models, pp. 465–474. English Universities Press, London (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Warner, D.M.: Scheduling nursing personnel according to nursing preferences: A mathematical programming approach. Oper. Res. 24(5), 842–856 (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Warner, D.M., Prawda, J.: A mathematical programming model for scheduling nursing personnel in a hospital. Manag. Sci. 19(4), 411–422 (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Wiens, D.P., Cheng, J., Beaulieu, N.C.: A class of method of moments estimators for the two-parameter gamma family. Pak. J. Stat. 19, 129–141 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prattana Punnakitikashem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Punnakitikashem, P., Rosenberger, J.M. & Buckley Behan, D. Stochastic programming for nurse assignment. Comput Optim Appl 40, 321–349 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-007-9084-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-007-9084-2

Keywords

Navigation