Skip to main content
Log in

New dominance rules and exploration strategies for the 1|r i |∑U i scheduling problem

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper proposes a new exact approach, based on a Branch, Bound, and Remember (BB&R) algorithm that uses the Cyclic Best First Search (CBFS) strategy, for the 1|r i |∑U i scheduling problem, a single machine scheduling problem, where the objective is to find a schedule with the minimum number of tardy jobs. The search space is reduced using new and improved dominance properties and tighter upper bounds, based on a new dynamic programming algorithm. Computational results establish the effectiveness of the BB&R algorithm with CBFS for a broad spectrum of problem instances. In particular, this algorithm was able to solve all problems instances, up to 300 jobs, while existing best known algorithms only solve problems instances up to 200 jobs. Furthermore, the BB&R algorithm with CBFS runs one to two orders of magnitude faster than the current best known algorithm on comparable instances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baptiste, P., Le Pape, C., Peridy, L.: Global constraints for partial CSPs: a case-study of resource and due date constraints. In: Constraint Programming 98. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1520, pp. 87–101 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baptiste, P., Peridy, L., Pinson, E.: A branch and bound to minimize the number of late jobs on a single machine with release time constraints. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 144(1), 1–11 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bedworth, D., Bailey, J.: Integrated Production Control Systems: Management, Analysis, Design. Wiley, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bellman, R.: Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1957)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Brucker, P.: Scheduling Algorithms, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dauzère-Pérès, S.: Minimizing late jobs in the general one machine scheduling problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 81(1), 134–142 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dauzère-Pérès, S., Sevaux, M.: Using Lagrangean relaxation to minimize the weighted number of late jobs on a single machine. Nav. Res. Logist. 50(3), 273–288 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dauzère-Pérès, S., Sevaux, M.: An exact method to minimize the number of tardy jobs in single machine scheduling. J. Sched. 7(6), 405–420 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Glover, F.: Future paths for integer programming and links to artificial intelligence. Comput. Oper. Res. 13(5), 533–549 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Graham, R., Lawler, E., Lenstra, J.K., Rinnooy Kan, A.: Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: a survey. Ann. Discrete Math. 4, 287–326 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Jouglet, A., Baptiste, P., Carlier, J.: Branch-and-bound algorithms for total weighted tardiness. In: Leung, J.Y.-T. (ed.) Handbook of Scheduling: Algorithms, Models, and Performance Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kao, G.K., Sewell, E.C., Jacobson, S.H.: A Branch, Bound, and remember algorithm for the 1|r i |∑t i scheduling problem. J. Sched. 12(2), 163–175 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kise, H., Ibaraki, T., Mine, H.: A solvable case of the one-machine scheduling problem with ready and due times. Oper. Res. 26(1), 121–126 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Koulamas, C.: The total tardiness problem: review and extensions. Oper. Res. 42(6), 1025–1041 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lasserre, J., Queyranne, M.: Generic scheduling polyhedra and a new mixed integer formulation for single machine scheduling. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Integer Programming Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 136–149 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lawler, E.: Knapsack-like scheduling problems, the Moore-Hodgson algorithm and the “tower of sets” property. Math. Comput. Model. 20(2), 91–106 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lenstra, J.K., Rinnooy Kan, A., Brucker, P.: Complexity of machine scheduling problems. Ann. Discrete Math. 1, 342–362 (1977)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. M’Hallah, R., Bulfin, R.L.: Minimizing the weighted number of tardy jobs on a single machine with release dates. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176(2), 727–744 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Moore, J.M.: An n job, one machine sequencing algorithm for minimizing the number of late jobs. Manag. Sci. 15(1), 102–109 (1968)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Morin, T., Marsten, R.: Branch-and-bound strategies for dynamic programming. Oper. Res. 24(4), 611–627 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Nemhauser, G.: Introduction to Dynamic Programming. Wiley, New York (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Péridy, L., Pinson, E., Rivreau, D.: Using short-term memory to minimize the weighted number of late jobs on a single machine. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 148(3), 591–603 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Pinedo, M.L.: Planning and Scheduling in Manufacturing and Services. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Potts, C.N., Van Wassenhove, L.N.: A branch and bound algorithm for the total weighted tardiness problem. Oper. Res. 33, 363–377 (1985)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Rinnooy Kan, A.: Machine Scheduling Problem: Classification, Complexity and Computations. Nijhoff, Hague (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sadykov, R.: A Hybrid Branch and Cut for the One Dimensional Machine Scheduling Problem. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3011, pp. 409–414 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sellers, D.W.: A survey of approaches to the job shop scheduling problem. In: 28th Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, Baton Rouge, LA, pp. 396–400 (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Sevaux, M., Dauzère-Pérès, S.: Genetic algorithms to minimize the weighted number of late jobs on a single machine. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 151(2), 296–306 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sewell, E.C., Kao, G.K., Jacobson, S.H.: Minimizing total tardiness for the single machine with sequence dependent setup time problem using the BB&R algorithm. Technical Report, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois

  30. Zhou, R., Hansen, E.A.: Structured duplicate detection in external-memory graph search. In: Proc. of 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Jose, CA, pp. 683–689 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou, R., Hansen, E.A.: Beam-stack search: integrating backtracking with beam search. In: Proc. of 15th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 90–98 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheldon H. Jacobson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kao, G.K., Sewell, E.C., Jacobson, S.H. et al. New dominance rules and exploration strategies for the 1|r i |∑U i scheduling problem. Comput Optim Appl 51, 1253–1274 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-010-9378-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-010-9378-7

Keywords

Navigation