Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

UML for electronic systems design: a comprehensive overview

  • Published:
Design Automation for Embedded Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

UML has been widely accepted by the software community for several years. As electronic systems design can no longer be seen as an isolated hardware design activity, UML becomes of significant interest as a unification language for systems description combining both HW and SW components. This article provides a comprehensive view of the UML applied to System-on-Chip (SoC) and hardware-related embedded systems design. The modeling concepts in the UML language are first introduced, including major diagrams for the representation of the behavior and the structure of systems. The principles behind application specific UML customizations (UML profiles) are summarized, and several examples relevant for SoC design are given, such as the SysML (System Modeling Language) and the SoC Profile. Thereafter, various approaches associating UML with existing HW/SW design languages are presented. Beyond language aspects, the article addresses the question of UML-based design flows, and shows how UML can be applied concretely to the development of electronic-based systems. The current situation about tool support constitutes the last focus of the article. In particular, we show how UML tools can be combined with well-known simulation environments, such as MATLAB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed W, Myers D (2006) Faster exploration of high level design alternatives using UML for better partitions. In: Proc design, automation and test in Europe (DATE) conf

  2. Akehurst D et al (2007) Compiling UML state diagrams into VHDL: an experiment in using model driven development. In: Proc forum specification & design languages (FDL)

  3. Artisan SW. From UML to SystemC—model driven development for SoC. Webinar, http://www.artisansw.com

  4. AUTOSAR—Automotive System Architecture http://www.autosar.org

  5. Axilica FalconML. http://www.axilica.com

  6. Bahill A, Gissing B (1998) Re-evaluating systems engineering concepts using systems thinking. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C, 516–527

  7. Baresi L et al. (2003) SystemC code generation from UML models. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  8. Basu AS et al (2005) A methodology for bridging the gap between UML & codesign. In: UML for SoC Design. Springer, Berlin

  9. Bell A (2004) Death by UML fever. ACM Queue 2(1)

  10. Björklund D, Lilius J (2002) From UML behavioral descriptions to efficient synthesizable VHDL. In: 20th IEEE NORCHIP conf

  11. Blechar M (2006) Magic quadrant for OOA&D tools (2H06 to 1H07). Technical report, Gartner Research Report G00140111

  12. Bocchio S, Riccobene E, Rosti A, Scandurra P (2005) A SoC design flow based on UML 2.0 and SystemC. In: Proc 2nd UML-SoC workshop at 42nd DAC conf

  13. Boehm B (1988) A spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Comput 21(5):61–72

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boudour R, Kimour M (2006) From design specification to SystemC. J Comput Sci 2:201–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. CATS XModelink. http://www.zipc.com/english/product/xmodelink/index.html

  16. Cockburn A (2000) Writing effective use cases. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cockburn A (2002) Use cases, ten years later. STQe 4(2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  18. Coyle F, Thornton M (2005) From UML to HDL: a model driven architectural approach to hardware-software co-design. In: Proc information syst: new generations conf (ISNG)

  19. Damasevicius R, Stuikys V (2004) Application of UML for hardware design based on design process model. In: Proc Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conf (ASP-DAC)

  20. Douglass B (2004) Real time UML. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. dSPACE. http://www.dspace.com

  22. Electronics Weekly & Celoxica (2005) Survey of system design trends. Technical report

  23. Extessy. http://www.extessy.com

  24. Forsberg K, Mooz H (1995) Application of the vee to incremental and evolutionary development. In: Proc 5th annual int symp national council on systems engineering

  25. Fujitsu (2002) New SoC design methodology based on UML and C programming languages. FIND 20(4):3–6

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goering R (2005) Tools missing as ESL rolls. EE Times

  27. Goering R (2006) System-level design language arrives. EE Times

  28. Grell D (2003) Rad am Draht, Innovationslawine in der Autotechnik. c’t 14:170–183

    Google Scholar 

  29. Grötker T, Liao S, Martin G, Swan S (2002) System design with systemC. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  30. Harel D (1987) Statecharts: a visual formalism for complex systems. Sci Comput Program 8(3):231–274

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Hooman J et al (2004) Coupling simulink and UML models. In: Proc symp FORMS/FORMATS

  32. International Council on Systems Engineering. http://www.incose.org

  33. ITU-T study group 17—Languages for telecommunication systems (2002) ITU-T recommendation Z. 100: specification and description language (SDL). Technical report

  34. JEITA (2000) LSI Biwako Workshop paper. JEITA System Level Design Study Group

  35. Katayama T (2005) Extraction of transformation rules from UML diagrams to SpecC. IEICE Trans Inf Syst 88(6):1126–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kruchten P (2003) The rational unified process: an introduction. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kumaraswamy A, Mulvaney D (2005) A Novel EDA flow for SoC designs based on specification capture. In: Proc ESC division mini-conference

  38. Laemmermann S et al (2006) Automatic generation of verification properties for SoC design from SysML diagrams. In: Proc 3rd UML-SoC workshop at 44th DAC conf

  39. Lilly S (1999) Use case pitfalls: top 10 problems from real projects using use cases. In: Proc technology of object-oriented languages and systems (TOOLS), pp 174–183

  40. Martin G, Mueller W (eds) (2005) UML for SoC design. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  41. McGrath D (2005) Unified modeling language gaining traction for SoC design. EE Times

  42. McUmber W, Cheng B (1999) UML-based analysis of embedded systems using a mapping to VHDL. In: Proc 4th IEEE int symp high-assurance systems engineering

  43. Mellor S (2005) Keynote talk: the gap between specification and synthesis. In: Proc forum on specification and design languages (FDL)

  44. Mellor S, Balcer M (2002) Executable UML: a foundation for model-driven architecture. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nguyen K et al (2004) Model-driven SoC design via executable UML to SystemC. In: Proc 25th IEEE int. real-time systems symposium (RTSS)

  46. OMG. OMG systems modeling language specification

  47. OMG (2004) UML 2.0 testing profile specification v2.0

  48. OMG (2004) UML profile for modeling QoS and fault tolerance characteristics and mechanisms

  49. OMG (2005) UML profile for schedulability, performance, and time (SPT) specification v1.1

  50. OMG (2006) Object constraint language specification v2.0

  51. OMG (2006) UML profile for system on a chip (SoC) specification v1.0.1

  52. OMG (2007) A UML profile for MARTE Beta 1

  53. OMG (2007) UML v2.1.1 infrastructure specification

  54. OMG (2007) UML v2.1.1 superstructure specification

  55. Open SoC Design Platform for Reuse and Integration of IPs (SPRINT). Project http://www.sprint-project.net

  56. Pauwels M et al. (2003) A design methodology for the development of a complex system-on-chip using UML and executable system models. In: Villar E, Mermet J (eds) System specification and design languages. Springer, Berlin, pp 129–141

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ramanan M (2006) SoC, UML and MDA—an investigation. In: Proc 3rd UML-SoC workshop at 43rd DAC conf

  58. Raslan W et al (2007) Mapping SysML to SystemC. In: Proc forum spec design lang (FDL)

  59. Reichmann C, Gebauer D, Müller-Glaser K (2004) Model level coupling of heterogeneous embedded systems. In: Proc 2nd RTAS workshop on model-driven embedded systems

  60. Riccobene E, Rosti A, Scandurra P (2004) Improving SoC design flow by means of MDA and UML profiles. In: Proc 3rd workshop in software model engineering

  61. Royce W (1970) Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques. In: Proc of IEEE WESCON

  62. Shen X-Y, Chen J (2006) A homomorphic mapping based algorithm to generate synthesizable verilog from UML. Comput Sci 33(4):247–249

    Google Scholar 

  63. Spirit Consortium. http://www.spiritconsortium.org

  64. Kangas T et al. (2006) UML-based multiprocessor SoC design framework. ACM Trans Embed Comput Syst (TECS) 5(2):281–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Tan W, Thiagarajan P, Wong W, Zhu Y (2004) Synthesizable SystemC code from UML models. In: Proc 1st UML for SoC workshop at 41st DAC conf

  66. The Mathworks (2007) Model-based design for embedded signal processing with simulink

  67. Thompson H et al (2004) A flexible environment for rapid prototyping and analysis of distributed real-tme safety-critical systems. In: Proc ARTISAN real-time users conf

  68. Thomson R, Chouliaras V, Mulvaney D (2007) From UML to structural hardware designs. In: Proc 4th UML-SoC workshop at 44th DAC conf

  69. UML-SoC Workshop Website. http://www.c-lab.de/uml-soc

  70. UML2 Eclipse Project. http://www.eclipse.org

  71. Vanderperren Y (2005) Keynote talk: SysML and systems engineering applied to UML-based SoC design. In: Proc 2nd UML-SoC workshop at 42nd DAC conf

  72. Vanderperren Y, Dehaene W (2006) From UML/SysML to Matlab/Simulink: current state and future perspectives. In: Proc design automation and test in Europe (DATE) conf

  73. Vanderperren Y, Wolfe J (2006) UML-SoC design survey. Available at http://www.c-lab.de/uml-soc

  74. Vanderperren Y, Pauwels M, Dehaene W, Berna A, Özdemir F (2003) A SystemC based system-on-chip modelling and design methodology. In: SystemC: methodologies and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  75. Vanderperren Y, Wolfe J, Douglass BP (2007) UML-SoC design survey. Available at http://www.c-lab.de/uml-soc

  76. Viehl A et al (2006) Formal performance analysis and simulation of UML/SysML models for ESL design. In: Proc design, automation and test in Europe (DATE) conf

  77. Wu YF, Xu Y (2007) Model-driven SoC/SoPC design via UML to impulse C. In: Proc 4th UML-SoC design workshop at 44th DAC conf

  78. Zhu Q, Oishi R, Hasegawa T, Nakata T (2005) Integrating UML into SoC design process. In: Proc design, automation and test in Europe (DATE) conf

  79. Zhu Y et al (2005) Using UML 2.0 for system level design of real time SoC platforms for stream processing. In: Proc IEEE int conf embedded real-time comp syst & applic (RTCSA)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (ESAT–MICAS), Leuven, Belgium

    Yves Vanderperren & Wim Dehaene

  2. Paderborn University (C-LAB), Paderborn, Germany

    Wolfgang Mueller

Authors
  1. Yves Vanderperren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wolfgang Mueller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wim Dehaene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yves Vanderperren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vanderperren, Y., Mueller, W. & Dehaene, W. UML for electronic systems design: a comprehensive overview. Des Autom Embed Syst 12, 261–292 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10617-008-9028-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10617-008-9028-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation