Skip to main content
Log in

A necessary and sufficient condition for diagnosability of stochastic discrete event systems

  • Published:
Discrete Event Dynamic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stochastic discrete event systems (SDES) are systems whose evolution is described by the occurrence of a sequence of events, where each event has a defined probability of occurring from each state. The diagnosability problem for SDES is the problem of determining the conditions under which occurrences of a fault can be detected in finite time with arbitrarily high probability. (IEEE Trans Autom Control 50(4):476–492 2005) proposed a class of SDES and proposed two definitions of stochastic diagnosability for SDES called A- and A A-diagnosability and reported a necessary and sufficient condition for A-diagnosability, but only a sufficient condition for A A-diagnosability. In this paper, we provide a condition that is both necessary and sufficient for determining whether or not an SDES is A A-diagnosable. We also show that verification of A A-diagnosability is equivalent to verification of the termination of the cumulative sum (CUSUM) procedure for hidden Markov models, and that, for a specific class of SDES called fault-immediate systems, the sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) minimizes the expected number of observable events required to distinguish between the normal and faulty modes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Athanasopoulou E, Li L, Hadjicostis C (2010) Maximum likelihood failure diagnosis in finite state machines under unreliable observations. IEEE Trans Autom Control 555(3):579–593

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand N, Fabre E, Haar S, Haddad S, Helout L (2014a) Active diagnosis for probabilistic systems. In: Proceedings of the FoSSaCS ’14, LNCS 8412, pp 29–42

  • Bertrand N, Haddad S, Lefaucheux E (2014b) Foundation of diagnosis and predictability in probabilistic systems. In: Proceedings of the FSTTCS’14, Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics 29, pp 417–429

  • Brémaud P (1999) Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields Monte Carlo Simulation and Queues. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cassandras C, Lafortune S (1999) Introduction to Discrete Event Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA

  • Fabre E, Jezequel L (2010) On the construction of probabilistic diagnosers. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Discrete Event Systems

  • Fuh CD (2003) SPRT and CUSUM in hidden Markov models. Ann Stat 31 (3):942–977. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3448426

  • Grossi E, Lops M (2008) Sequential detection of Markov targets with trajectory estimation. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 54(9):4144 –4154. doi:10.1109/TIT.2008.928261

  • Lin F, Ying H (2002) Modeling and control of fuzzy discrete event systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 32(4):408–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Qiu D (2008) Safe diagnosability of stochastic discrete event systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 53(5):1291–1296

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Qiu D (2009) Diagnosability of fuzzy discrete-event systems: A fuzzy approach. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17(2):372–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Qiu D, Xing H, Fan Z (2008) Decentralized diagnosis of stochastic discrete event systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 53(2):535–546

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lunze J, Schröder J (2001) State observation and diagnosis of discrete-event systems described by stochastic automata. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications 11(4):319–369

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu D, Liu F (2009) Fuzzy discrete event systems under fuzzy observability and a test-algorithm. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17(3):578–589

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu D W (2005) Supervisory control of fuzzy discrete event systems: A formal approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 35(1):72–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampath M, Sengupta R, Lafortune S, Sinnamohideen K, Teneketzis D (1995) Diagnosability of discrete-event systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 40 (9):1555–1575

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth P (1994) Hidden Markov models for fault detection in dynamic systems. Pattern Recogn 21(1):149–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorsley D (2010) Diagnosability of stochastic chemical kinetic systems: a discrete event systems approach. In: Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference, pp 2623–2630

  • Thorsley D, Teneketzis D (2005) Diagnosability of stochastic discrete-event systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 50(4):476–492

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Thorsley D, Yoo TS, Garcia H (2008) Diagnosability of stochastic discrete-event systems under unreliable observations. In: Proceedings of the 2008 American Control Conference, pp 1158–1165

  • Wald A (1945) Sequential tests of statistical hypotheses. Ann Math Stat 16 (2):117–186. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2235829

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Thorsley.

Additional information

This research is partially supported by NSF award #10002220, “Estimation and Observation of Stochastic Biochemical Networks.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thorsley, D. A necessary and sufficient condition for diagnosability of stochastic discrete event systems. Discrete Event Dyn Syst 27, 481–500 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10626-017-0236-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10626-017-0236-y

Keywords