Abstract
Has ICT changed education? Has the reformative, humanistic and emancipatory role that many educators have envisaged for ICT in education been realized in the reality of classrooms? Bearing in mind these two critical questions, the present paper attempts to approach the visionary narrative of the so-called information society (in recent times also referred to as knowledge society) and the rhetoric underlying the role of ICT as an agent for change and a substitute for education. Latest international facts and figures are examined with the purpose of assessing the realization of this role and raising critical arguments against the idea of perceiving ICT as the totem of educational change. From this evidence, it is argued that educational media and tools cannot revolutionize, but can only strengthen, further and reinforce established educational goals, curriculum contents, teaching and learning methods. This leads us to conclude that, as the educational use of ICT becomes assimilated, it mirrors and to a certain degree broadens or exacerbates prevailing socio-economic problems and current educational conditions. Thus the main focus of the paper is to attempt to redefine and re-approach the role of ICT from a human and democratic standpoint. It concentrates on ICT success stories, which seem to whisper the critical pedagogy tale. These stories serve as an avenue for reflecting upon the liberating possibilities of ICT, which can flourish when they are embedded in an alternative and progressive educational setting. In such an educational context, ICT represents an interesting, challenging and essential educational theme, one of the necessary keys for unlocking, understanding and participating in a competitive, demanding and insecure world. On the other hand, critical use of ICT tools enhances, promotes and extends democratic curriculum practices, processes and structures by offering students and teachers a multiple set of media and tools for expression, interaction, creation, reflection, analysis, construction, communication and meaning making. Focusing on students’ participation in common life as critical, knowledgeable, conscious and able citizens appears to bring about a new conception of ICT, namely a critical pedagogy and pedagogy of praxis perspective towards ICT. Yet, for such a focus to prevail we need to change our view of what it means to educate and what it means to be educated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apple, M. (1993). The politics of official knowledge: Does a national curriculum make sense? Teachers College Record, 95(2), 222–241.
Apple, M. W. (1998). Teaching and technology: The hidden effects of computers on teachers and students. In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), In the curriculum: Problems, politics and possibilities. New York: State University Press of New York.
Apple, M. W. (2001). Educating the “right” way. Markets, standards, God and inequality. London: Routledge.
Apple, M., & Beane, J. (1999). Democratic schools: Lessons form the chalk face. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Blikstein, P., & Cavallo, D. (2002). Technology as a Trojan horse in school environments: The emergence of the learning atmosphere (II). In proceedings of the Interactive Computer Aided Learning International Workshop, Carinthia Technology Institute, Villach, Austria, 2002. Retrieved from http://www.blikstein.com/paulo/publication.html.
Bromley, H. (1998). Introduction: Data-driven democracy? Social assessment of educational computing. In H. Bromley & M. Apple (Eds.), In education/technology/power: Educational computing as a social practice. New York: State University of New York Press.
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. London: Harvard University Press.
Eurydice (2004). Key data on information and communication technology in schools in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice.
Facer, K. (2002). What do we mean by the digital divide? Exploring the roles of access, relevance and resource networks. In BECTA (Ed.), Digital divide: A collection of papers from the Toshiba/Becta digital divide seminar. Coventry: BECTA.
Kellner, D. (2000). Multiple literacies and critical pedagogies: New paradigms. In P. P. Trifonas (Ed.), In revolutionary pedagogies: Cultural politics, instituting education and the discourse of theory. London: Routledge.
Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1–14.
Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2003). Primary pupils’ and teachers’ use of computers at home and school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 79–83.
Noble, D. (1998). The regime of technology in education. In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), In the curriculum: Problems, politics and possibilities. New York: State University Press of New York.
OECD (2001). Learning to change: ICT in schools. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2006). Are students ready for a technology rich world? What the PISA studies tell us. Paris: OECD.
Pelgrum, W. J., & Anderson, R. E. (Eds.) (1999). ICT and the emerging paradigm for lifelong learning. Amsterdam: IEA.
Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (2002). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: Peter Lang.
Reynolds, D., Treharne, D., & Tripp, H. (2003). ICT—The hopes and the reality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 151–167.
Robins, K., & Webster, F. (1999). Times of the technoculture: From the information society to the virtual life. London: Routledge.
Sheldon, K. M., & Biddle, B. J. (1998). Standards, accountability, and school reform: Perils and pitfalls. In Teachers College Record, 100(1), 164–180.
Stone, A. (1998). Learning to exercise power: Computers and community development. In H. Bromley, & M. Apple (Eds.), In education/technology/power: Educational computing as a social practice. New York: State University of New York Press.
Tsiakalos, G. (2002). The promise of pedagogy. Thessaloniki: Paratiritis (In Greek).
Webster, F. (2002). Theories of the information society. New York: Routledge.
Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., & Tuson, J. (2000). Teachers and ICT: Current use and future needs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 307–320.
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482–515.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drenoyianni, H. Reconsidering change and ICT: Perspectives of a human and democratic education. Educ Inf Technol 11, 401–413 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-006-9005-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-006-9005-5