Abstract
This paper aims to determine the factors affecting the decisions of both male and female secondary school pupils whether or not to pursue undergraduate studies in Computing. It is based on research conducted in Greece, on a sample of 248 pupils, 135 of whom were female. All were aged 17 and about to decide on their future undergraduate studies. Questionnaires were used, addressing issues in the following four main categories: a) the reasons pupils chose/rejected Computing, b) how family and friends, the media and the school environment contribute to their decision, c) how pupils perceived their future after studying Computing and d) how pupils perceived the profile of a computer professional in terms of gender.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
In Greece, all high school pupils take examinations in order to enter University. Depending on their grades, they enter one of the schools for which they have previously registered. In terms of entry requirements, computing departments are among the most competitive and demanding in Greece.
References
Balcita, A., Carver, D., & Soffa, M. L. (2002). Shortchanging the future of information technology: the untapped resource. ACM SIGCSE in roads, special issue: Women and Computing, 34(2), 32–35.
Camp, T. (1997). The incredible shrinking pipeline. Communications of the ACM, 40(10), 103–110.
Chen, M. (1986). Gender and computers: the beneficial effects of experience on attidudes. Educational Computing Research, 2(3).
Clarke, V. A., & Teague, G. J. (1996). Characterizations of computing careers: students and professionals disagree. Computers and Education, 26(4), 241–246.
Countryman, J., Feldman, A., Kekelis, A., & Spertus, E. (2002). Developing a hardware and programming curriculum for middle school girls. ACM SIGCSE in roads, special issue: Women and Computing, 34(2), 44–47.
Duplantis, W., MacGregor, E., Klawe, M., & Ng, M. (2002). Virtual family: an approach to introducing java programming. ACM SIGCSE in roads, special issue: Women and Computing, 34(2), 40–43.
Fisher, A., & Margolis, J. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Goritz, C., & Medina, C. (2000). Engaging girls with computers through software games. Communications of ACM, 43(1), 42–49.
Gürer, D. (1995). Pioneering women in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 38(1), 45–54.
Gürer, D., & Camp, T. (2002). An ACM-W literature review on women in computing. ACM SIGCSE in roads, special issue: Women and Computing, 34(2), 121–127.
Huff, C., & Cooper, J. (1987). Sex bias in educational software; the effect of designers’ stereotypes on the software they design. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(6), 519–532.
Jepson, A., & Perl, T. (2002). Priming the pipeline. ACM SIGCSE in roads, special issue: Women and Computing, 34(2), 36–39.
Johnson, D., & Miller, K. (2002). Is diversity in computing a moral matter? ACM SIGCSE in roads, special issue: Women and Computing, 34(2), 9–10.
Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., & Eccles, J. (1985). Pool halls, chips, and war games: women in the culture of computing. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 451–462.
Klawe, M., & Leveson, N. (1995). Women in computing: Where are we now? Communications of ACM, 38(1), 29–35.
Lazowska, E. (2002). Pale and male: 19th century design in a 21st century world. ACM SIGCSE in roads, special issue: Women and Computing, 34(2), 11–12.
Lee, J. (2002). Well behaved women rarely make history! ACM SIGCSE in roads, special issue: Women and Computing, 34(2), 14–15.
Marton, F. (1988). Phenomenography: Exploring different conceptions of reality. In: D. M. Fetterman (Ed.), In qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: The silent scientific revolution (pp. 176–205). New York: Praeger.
Moskal, B. (2002). Female computer science doctorates: what does the survey of earned doctorates reveal? ACM SIGCSE in roads, special issue: Women and Computing, 34(2), 105–111.
Pearl, A., Pollack, M., Riskin, E., Thomas, B., Wolf, E., & Wu, A. (1990). Becoming a computer scientist. Communications of the ACM, 33(11), 47–57.
Schofield, J. W. (1995). Computers and classroom culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Teague, J. (2000). Women in computing: What brings them to it, what keeps them in it? GATES, 5(1), 45–49.
Tsagala, E., & Kordaki, M. (2005). Essential factors that affect students’ choices to study computer science: Gender differences. 7th International Conference for computer based learning in science (pp. 541–552). Zilina, Slovakia, July, 2005.
Wardle, C., & Burton, L. (2002). Programmatic efforts encouraging women to enter the information technology workforce. ACM SIGCSE in roads, special issue: Women and Computing, 34(2), 27–31.
Woodfield, R. (2000). Women, work and computing. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to Eleni Thermogianni for helping in the collection of the data used in this study and to Stephen Taylor at TES-Patras for proof reading and assisting with our English.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsagala, E., Kordaki, M. Critical factors influencing secondary school pupil’s decisions to study computing in tertiary education: Gender differences. Educ Inf Technol 12, 281–295 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-006-9026-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-006-9026-0