Abstract
How should the information age affect teaching goals and methods? One of the claims voiced by educators is that computerized information tools make systematic study and acquisition of information redundant. Put bluntly this claim states that students should no longer ‘waste’ their time learning or memorizing texts and facts that can be retrieved in a keystroke. We attempted to examine the current role of information acquisition in learning processes by interviewing 24 expert academic researchers who work regularly with computerized information tools. Analysis of the researchers’ descriptions of their learning and thinking processes revealed that, according to the majority of the researchers, computerized information tools have not reduced the importance learning and acquiring information. These exploratory findings suggest that information acquisition should still be an important part of the curriculum in the age of information.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Library Association (ALA) (1989). American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report. Retrieved March 12, 2005: http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/whitepapers/presidential.htm
Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, 3rd edn. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Barry, C. A. (1997). The research activity timeline: A qualitative tool for information research. Library and Information Science Research, 19(2), 153–179.
Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2006). How does Information technology shape thinking? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 130–145.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking R. R. (eds) (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
Breivik, P. S. (1998). Student learning in the information age. Phoenix: American Council On Education / Oryx Press.
Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188–227). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Burbules, N. C. (1998). Digital texts and the future of scholarly writing and publication. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(1), 105–124.
Cobb, P. (2005). Where is the mind? A coordination of sociocultural and cognitive constructivism perspectives. In Fosnot, C. T. (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 39–60). New York and London: Teachers College Press.
Cole, M., & Engstrom, Y. (1993). A cultural–historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cole, M., & Derry, J. (2005). We have met technology and it is us. In R. J. Sternberg, & D. D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology (pp. 209–227). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ellis, D., Cox, D., & Hall, K. (1993). A Comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 356–369.
Eylon, B., & Linn, M. C. (1998). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education. Review of Educational Research, 58(3), 251–301.
Finholt, T. A., & Brooks, J. M. (1997). Analysis of JSTOR: The impact on scholarly practice of access to on-line journal archives. Paper presented at the Conference on Scholarly Communication and Technology (Atlanta, GA, April 24–25, 1997). Retrieved March 12, 2005: http://www.arl.org/scomm/scat/finholt.html
Glaser, R. (1984). The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39(2), 93–104.
Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.
Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M, & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (Eds), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York: Macmillan.
Karasavvidis, I. (2002). Distributed cognition and educational practice. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(1), 11–29.
Land, S., & Greene, B. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(1), 45–67.
Linn, M. C., Eylon, B., & Davis, E. A. (2004). The knowledge integration perspective on learning. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds), Internet environments for science education (29–46).Mahwah: Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Moore, J. L., & Rocklin, T. R. (1998). The distribution of distributed cognition: Multiple interpretations and uses. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 97–113.
Olson, J. (2000). Trojan horse or teacher’s pet? Computers and the culture of school. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(1), 1–8.
Owston, R. (1997). The world wide web: A technology to enhance teaching and learning? Educational Researcher, 26(2), 27–33.
Pea, R. D. (1987). Integrating human and computer intelligence. In R. D. Pea, & K. Sheingold (Eds), Mirrors of minds: Patterns of experience in educational computing (pp. 128–146). Norwood: Ablex.
Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-Plus: a distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88–110). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Perkins, D. N., Crismond, D., Simmons, R., & Unger, C. (1995). Inside understanding. In D. N. Perkins, J. L. Schwartz, M. West, & M. S. Wiske (Eds), Software goes to school: Teaching for understanding with new technologies (pp. 70–88). New York: Oxford University Press.
Porter, S. (1998). Into the future. Scholarly needs, current provisions, and future directions. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 4, 190–224.
Resnick, L. B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as a social practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–19). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach, 2nd edn. New York: The Free Press.
Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individuals’ cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111–138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Salomon, G. (2000a). Technology and Education In The Age Of Information (In Hebrew). Haifa and Tel-Aviv: University of Haifa and Zmora-Bitan Press.
Salomon, G. (2000b). It’s not just the tool, but the educational rationale that counts. Keynote address at the 2000 Ed-Media Meeting. Retrieved March 12, 2005: http://www.aace.org/conf/edmedia/00/salomonkeynote.htm
Schwarz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (2002). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475–522.
Slotta, J. D., & Linn, M. C. (2000). The Knowledge integration environment: Helping students use the internet effectively. In M. L. Jacobson, R. B. Kozma (Eds), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advance designs for technologies of learning (pp. 193–226). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barzilai, S., Zohar, A. Is information acquisition still important in the information age?. Educ Inf Technol 13, 35–53 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-007-9046-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-007-9046-4