Abstract
In education, case studies have been employed as a major pedagogical means to engage students with realistic materials and practical problems. The usefulness and success of case studies have been documented in literature. In this paper, we move the case study and its technical affordance a step further toward more authentic or realistic learning and toward communities of practice. Drawing on current intellectual achievement in education, developmental psychology and computer-supported collaborative learning, this paper proposes four requirements for interactive case study libraries, focusing on authentic learning, social interaction, resource accumulation, and communities of practice. With a usability engineering case study library as an example, we discuss design concerns derived from these requirements as well as its use in practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, M. J., Quignard, M., Lund, K., & Séjourné, A. (2003). Computer-supported collaborative learning in the space of debate. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments. Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht.
Berry, B., Hobby, L., McCrickard, S., North, C., & Pérez-Quiñones, M. A. (2006). Exploring benefits of visualization for case studies. Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2006 Conference, Orlando FL, June 2006
Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2005a). A case library for teaching usability engineering: design rationale, development, and classroom experience. ACM Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 5, 1–22. Article 3.
Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2005b). Toward even more authentic case-based learning. Educational Technology, 45(6), 5–11.
Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2005c). Case studies as minimalist information designs. Proceedings of HICSS 38: Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, (Hilton Waikoloa Village, January 3–6). IEEE Digital Library.
Carroll, J. M., Ganoe, C. H., & Jiang, H. (2008). Introducing the digital case library. In M. Pagani (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Multimedia Technology and Networking (2nd ed., pp. 782–788). Hershey, PA: IGI.
Center for Women and public policy. Retrieved April 19, 2008 from http://www.hhh.umn.edu/centers/wpp/case_studies.html.
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. Resnick, J. Levine & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Hyattsville, MD: American Psychological Association.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology., 94, S95–121.
Curtis, B., Krasner, H., & Iscoe, N. (1988). A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM, 31(11), 1268–1287.
Dietrich, S. W., & Urban, S. D. (1996). Database theory in practice: learning from cooperative group projects. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Proceedings of the twenty-seventh SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 28(1), 112–116.
FEDORA. Retrieved April 19, 2008 from http://www.fedora.info.
Garvin, D. A. (2003). Making the case. Harvard Magazine, 106(1), 56–65. 107.
Grudin, J. (1988). Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluation of organization of organizational interfaces. Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work. Portland, Oregon, United States, ACM Press.
Grudin, J. (1994). Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM, 37(1), 92–105.
Hartfield, B., Winograd, T., & Bennett, J. (1992). Learning HCI design: mentoring project groups in a course on human-computer interaction. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Proceedings of the twenty-third SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 24(1), 246–251.
Hayes, J. H. Lethbridge, T. C., & Port, D. (2003). Papers on software engineering education and training: course delivery and evaluation: Evaluating individual contribution toward group software engineering projects. IEEE Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 622–627.
Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2005). The National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science. State University of New York at Buffalo. Includes direct access to a case library, portal to other Web-based case libraries, description of case-based teaching techniques, and research papers on case-based learning techniques and outcomes. http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/projects/cases/ubcase.htm.
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48.
Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 59–71.
Horton, W.S. & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? 59(1), 91–117
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think, a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. New York: D. C. Heath.
Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Stanne, M. B. (1985). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(6), 668–677.
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2005). Internal and external collaboration scripts in web-based science learning at schools. Proceedings of CSCL 2005 (pp. 331–340). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & van Buuren, H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers andEducation, 49(2), 176–192.
Lamancusa, J. J., Jorgensen, J. E., Zayas-Castro, J. L., & de Ramirez, L. M. (2001). The learning factory - integrating design, manufacturing and business realities into engineering curricula. International Conference on Engineering Education (August 6–10, Oslo, Norway), pp. 1–6.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lopes, P. N., Brackett, M. A., Nezlek, J. B., Schutz, A., Sellin, I., & Salovey, P. (2004). Emotional intelligence and social interaction. Per-sonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1018–1034.
Marlino, M., Sumner, T., Fulker, D., Manduca, C., & Mogk, D. (2001). The digital library for earth system education: building community, building the library. Communications of the ACM, 44(5), 80–81.
McMillan, D. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 315–325.
Means, B., & Olson, K. (1994). The link between technology and authentic learning. Educational Leadership. April, 15–18.
Moran, T. P., & Carroll, J. M. (eds). (1994). Design rationale: concepts, techniques, and use. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nardi, B. (2005). Beyond bandwidth: dimensions of connection in interpersonal communication. Computer-SupportedCooperativeWork, 14, 91–130.
National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science. Retrieved April 19, 2008 from http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/projects/cases/case.html.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating Company Oxford University Press.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology., 22, 1–24.
Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2004). A development research agenda for online collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 53–65.
Resnick, P. (2002). Beyond bowling together: socio-technical capital. In HCI in the New Millennium, Carroll, J. M. (Ed.), pp. 247–272.
Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2002). Usability engineering: scenario-based development of human-computer interaction. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Rosson, M. B., Carroll, J. M., & Rodi, C. (2004). Case studies for teaching usability engineering. Proceedings of 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Norfolk, VA, March 3–7). New York: ACM Press, pp. 36–40.
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building a sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (On-Line), 3(1). Retrieved April 19, 2008 from http://www.irrodl.org/content/v3.1/rovai.html.
Shott, S. (1979). Emotion and social life: a symbolic interactionist analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1317–1334.
Stanford law school case studies collection. Retrieved April 19, 2008 from http://www.law.stanford.edu/publications/casestudies/
Stein, S. J., Isaacs, G., & Andrews, T. (2004). Incorporating authentic learning experiences within a university course. Studies in Higher Education, 29(2), 239–258.
The Electronic Hallway. Public affair case study collection, Retrieved April 19, 2008 from https://hallway.org
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675–691.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: a sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Williams, S. M. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: examples from legal and medical education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 367–427.
Xiao, L., Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2007). Support Case-Based Authentic Learning Activities: A Collaborative Case Commenting Tool and a Collaborative Case Builder. Human-Computer Interaction LNCS, 4553, 371–380.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, H., Ganoe, C. & Carroll, J.M. Four requirements for digital case study libraries. Educ Inf Technol 15, 219–236 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-009-9108-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-009-9108-x