Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge articulation dialog increases online university science course outcomes

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

University graduate level science courses (over four different semesters) were investigated to measure how knowledge articulation dialog (in discussion forums) improved essay and case study scores. The knowledge articulation teaching methodology was integrated from the educational psychology and knowledge management literature while Socratic questioning was drawn from the education community of practice. A quasi-experiment (with strong degree of control) was configured, with teaching method (knowledge articulation versus questioning) being the treatment factor. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, ANOVA, MANOVA and MANCOVA techniques were utilized to test the hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). Is there an optimal design for on-line mba courses? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 135–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. C., Jensen, P. J., & Kolb, D. A. (2002). Conversational learning. Westport: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, S. C., & Ginns, P. (2007). The linking of institutional performance indicators to improvements in teaching in classrooms. Quality in Higher Education, 13(3), 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. D. (1993). Self-directed learning, political clarity, and the critical practice of adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 43(4), 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, C. (2005). Multi-level alignment model: transforming face-to-face into e-instructional programs. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(5/6), 346–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, H., & Hamilton, D. (2009). Quality in business education as measured by accreditation and ranking systems. International Journal of Management in Education, 3(3/4), 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G., Carr, T., & Hall, M. (2004). Evaluating the use of synchronous communication in two blended courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning; Oxford, 20(3), 183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J., & Smith, L. (2005). Co-teaching in higher education: Reflective conversation on shared experience as continued professional development for lecturers and health and social care students. Reflective Practice, 6(4), 491–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Barron, B., Pearson, P. D., Schoenfeld, A. H., Stage, E. K., Zimmerman, T. D., et al. (2008). Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding. NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, L., Jones, C., & Hoyt, J. (2003). The effect of interaction levels on student performance: a comparative analysis of web mediated versus traditional delivery. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(3), 285–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiemstra, R., & Brockett, R. G. (1994). Overcoming resistance to self-direction in adult learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 64, 32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (2008). Socratic epistemology: Explorations of knowledge-seeking by questioning. New York: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenlink, P., & Carr, A. A. (1996). Conversation as a medium for change in education. Educational Technology, 4, 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienle, A. (2009). Intertwining synchronous and asynchronous communication to support collaborative learning—system design and evaluation. Education and Information Technologies, 14(1), 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, E., & Forland, H. (2008). Bridging the gap in expectations between international students and academic staff. Journal of Studies in International Education, 12, 204–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemm, W. R. (2002). Analytical model for teaching students to analyze research reports in an asynchronous computer conference environment. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(5), 298–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (2007). Modelling benefits-oriented costs for technology enhanced learning. Higher Education, 54(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemak, D. J., Shin, S. J., Reed, R., & Montgomery, J. C. (2005). Technology, transactional distance, and instructor effectiveness: an empirical investigation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 150–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooij, T. (2009). Education and ict-based self-regulation in learning: theory, design and implementation. Education and Information Technologies, 14(1), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2001). Seci, ba, and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. In I. Nonaka & D. Teece (Eds.), Managing industrial knowledge creation, transfer and utilization. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1975). Conversation, cognition, and learning. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G., Kallikourdis, D., & Scott, B. C. E. (1975). The representation of knowables. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 17, 15–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psaromiligkos, Y., & Retalis, S. (2003). Re-evaluating the effectiveness of a web-based learning system: a comparative case study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(1), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in a short web-based course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, L., Billig, S. H., & Tavalin, F. (2000). Good online conversation: building on research to inform practice. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(1), 85–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, B. L., Norwood, M., Ezell, S., & Waight, C. (2006). Case study: collaborative creation of an on-line degree program. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(3), 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang, K. D. (2004). Applying learning goal theory and relational database design to web-based education creation and delivery. Proceedings of the North America Web Conference, Fredericton NB. Retrieved June 23, 2009 from www.unb.ca/naweb2004

  • Strang, K. D. (2009a). How multicultural learning approach impacts grade for international university students in a business course. Asian English Foreign Language Journal Quarterly, 11(4), 271–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, K. D. (2009b). Measuring online learning approach and mentoring preferences of international doctorate students. International Journal of Education Research, 48(3), 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, K. D. (2010a). Articulating tacit knowledge in multinational e-collaboration on new product designs. In P. Francq (Ed.), Collaborative search and communities of interest: Trends in knowledge sharing and assessment. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, K. D. (2010b). Effectively teach professionals online: Explaining and testing educational psychology theories (2nd ed.). Germany: VDM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., & Shaw, S. M. (2006). Teaching courses online: a review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, B. T. (2003). Does talking with peers help learning? The role of expertise and talk in convergent group discussion tasks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, P.-J., Hwang, G.-J., Tseng, J. C. R., & Hwang, G. H. (2008). Computer-assisted approach to conducting cooperative learning process. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 6(1), 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57(2), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A. F., Padmanabhana, P., & Duffy, T. M. (2009). Connecting online learners with diverse local practices: the design of effective common reference points for conversation. Distance Education Journal, 30(3), 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, R. S. (2001). Variations on a string bag: using pask’s principles for practical course design. Kybernetes, 30(7/8), 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth D. Strang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strang, K.D. Knowledge articulation dialog increases online university science course outcomes. Educ Inf Technol 16, 123–137 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-010-9130-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-010-9130-z

Keywords

Navigation