Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The role of feedback in e-assessments for engineering education

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to compare two differently designed e-assessments (formative assessments) which supported the same engineering courses for two academic years. In this investigation two group of students participated (Control Group: CG and Experimental Group: EG). The teachers followed exactly the same teaching approach using the same learning tools (apart from the e-assessments) in the same learning environment. The first group of students (CG) had the opportunity to timely receive grades along with the correct answers, when they submitted the e-assessments on-line. The teachers themselves designed these e-assessments in BlackBoard Vista© learning environment. The second group of students (EG) had the opportunity to receive feedback each on their own individual responses having unlimited attempts to participate in the e-assessments designed by PhD students. We will demonstrate that the addition of individual feedback and the unlimited attempts increased the EG group performance at the end of the courses (summative assessment) in comparison to the CG group of students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J. D., & CTGV. (1998). Doing with understanding: lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 271–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). The taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David Mackay Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloxham, S., & Boyd, S. (2007). Developing effective assessment in higher education-a practical guide. Maidenhead. McGraw Hill: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocij, P. & Greasley, A. (1999). Can computer-based testing achieve quality and efficiency in assessment? International Journal of Educational Technology, 1(1). http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/ijet/v1n1/bocij/index.html. Accessed 11 July 1999.

  • Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 35–48). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, J., Harris, D., & Mayadas, F. (2005). On-line engineering education: learning anywhere, anytime. Journal of Engineering Education, 9(1), 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience and school (expandedth ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. T. L., Lake, R., & Matters, G. (2011). Queensland teachers’ conceptions of assessment: the impact of policy priorities on teacher attitudes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 210–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, T. (2000). The efficacy of a World-Wide Web mediated formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(3), 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrow, M., Evdorides, H., Hallam, B., & Freer-Hewish, R. (2005). Developing formative assessments for postgraduate students in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dermo, J. (2009). E-assessment and the student learning experience: a survey of students perceptions of e-assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dopper, S. M., & Sjoer, E. (2004). Implementing formative assessment in engineering education: the use of the on-line assessment system Etude. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, S. W. (2009). Catalytic assessment: understanding how MCQs and EVS can foster deep learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 285–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: the limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(7), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgamal, A. E., Abas, H. A., & Baladoh, E.-S. M. (2011). An interactive e-learning system for improving web programming skills. Educational and Information Technologies. doi:10.1007/s1063901191757.

  • Farrell, G., & Leung, Y. K. (2004). Innovative on-line assessment using confidence measurement. education and information technologies, 9(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). On-line formative assessment in higher education: a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gipps, C. V. (2005). What is the role of ICT-bases assessment in universities? Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, S. (2004). A constructivist approach to project assessment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, O. A. B. (2011). Learning theories and assessment methodologies-an engineering educational perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heap, N. W., Kear, K. L., & Bissell, C. C. (2004). An overview of ICT-based assessment for engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 241–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton-Shrestha, C., Edirisingha, P., Burke, L., & Linsey, T. (2005). Introducing a VLE into campus-based undergraduate teaching: staff perspectives on its impact on teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(6), 370–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton-Shrestha, C., Gripps, C., Edirisingha, P., & Linsey, T. (2007). Learning and e-learning in HE: the relationship between student learning and VLE use. Research Papers in Education, 22(4), 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) (2009). National Student Survey. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/hefce/2009/nss.htm. Accessed 6 August 2009.

  • Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: a case of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864–873.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Limniou, M., & Smith, M. (2010). Teachers’ and students’ perspectives on teaching and learning through Virtual Learning Environments. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6), 645–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, L., White, S., & Davis, H. C. (2004). Changing assessments practice in engineering: how can understanding lecturer perspectives help? European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D. (2007). E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(1), 53–64.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachler, N., Daly, C., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2010). Formative e-assessment: practitioner cases. Computers & Education, 54(3), 715–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roselli, R. J., & Brophy, S. P. (2006). Experiences with formative assessment in engineering classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 325–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77–84.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. (2002). Identifying academics’ orientations to assessment practice. Higher Education, 43(2), 173–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (2007). How does student performance on formative assessments relate to learning assessed by exam? Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(7), 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, J. J., Greenwood-Ericksen, A., Cannon-Brower, J., & Bowers, C. A. (2006). Using virtual reality with and without gaming attributes for academic achievement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T. H. (2008). Web-based quiz-game-like formative assessment: development and evaluation. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1247–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, M., Procter, B., & Murshid, K. (2009). Assessment for learning and skills development: the case of large classes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(1), 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • William, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M. (2001). Formative assessment and its relevance to retention. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering Education, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Maria Limniou & Michael Smith

Authors
  1. Maria Limniou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Limniou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Limniou, M., Smith, M. The role of feedback in e-assessments for engineering education. Educ Inf Technol 19, 209–225 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9200-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9200-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation