Abstract
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems (ERP) are very large and complex software packages that run every aspect of an organization. Increasingly, ERP systems are being used in higher education as one way to teach business processes, essential knowledge for students competing in today’s business environment. Past research attempting to measure learning business processes with ERP has been inconclusive and lacking in rigor. This paper reports on a comprehensive research study that uses a critical realist approach to measure business process learning from experiential ERP. Using a business simulation game as a proxy for understanding business processes, students from a US undergraduate program in three separate classes, one using ERP experientially, are assessed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The data analysis uncovers a causal mechanism for learning, complemented by an understanding of the factors that trigger or suppress that mechanism in particular cases. The results validate the efforts of those using ERP in the classroom, and reaffirm other educational business school endeavours to teach business processes, with educational implications as follows. First, before attempting to learn business processes, students must have an understanding of core business concepts. Second, hands-on experience of ERP systems indeed helps students understand business processes. Third, students are showing that they can use the knowledge gained in university classes and apply it to making business decisions. Fourth, students should be encouraged to use all information possible for making business decisions instead of relying on their personal understanding of today’s current market or on their own business intuition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amrani, R. E., Rowe, F., & Geffroy-Maronnat, B. (2006). The effects of enterprise resource planning implementation strategy on cross-functionality. Information Systems Journal, 16(1), 79–104.
Anderson, P. J. J., Blatt, R., Christianson, M. K., Grant, A. M., Marquis, C., Neumann, E. J., Sonenshein, S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2006). Understanding mechanisms in organizational research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(2), 102–113.
Barua, A., Ravindran, S., & Whinston, A. B. (2007). Enabling information sharing within organizations. Information Technology and Management, 8(1), 31.
Bhaskar, R., & Hartwig, M. (2010). The Formation of Critical Realism A Personal Perspective. Oxford, England: Routledge.
Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university : what the student does. Buckinghamshire: SRHE and Open University Press.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives The Classification of Educational Goals Handbook I Cognitive Domain. London: Longman.
Bygstad, B. and Munkvold, B.E., 2011. In Search of Mechanisms. Conducting a Critical Realist Data Analysis, Thirty Second International Conference on Information Systems, 6 December, 2011 Shanghai: ICIS.
Danermark, B., Ekstrom, M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. C. (2002). Explaining society : critical realism in the social sciences. London and New York: Routledge.
Easton, G. (2010). Critical realism in case study research. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 118–128.
Harmon, P. (2007). Business Process Change, A Guide for Business Managers and BPM and Six Sigma Professionals (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Keys, B., & Wolfe, J. (1990). The Role of Management Games and Simulations in Education and Research. Journal of Management, 16(2), 307.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Leger, P. (2006). Using a simulation game approach to teach enterprise resource planning concepts. Journal of Information Systems Education, 17(4), 441–447.
Mingers, J. (2001). Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 240–259.
Monk, E., & Lycett, M. (2011). Using a Computer Business Simulation to Measure Effectiveness of Enterprise Resource Planning Education on Business Process Comprehension, International Conference on Information Systems ICIS, December 6, 2011 2011. Shanghai: ICIS.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28.
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387.
Rienzo, T.F. and Han, B.T., 2010. Learning Business Process Integration: Step by Step Is Only the First Step. Decision Line, March 2010, pp. 7-9
Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science: a realist approach. London: Routledge.
Smith, M. L. (2006). Overcoming theory-practice inconsistencies: critical realism and information systems research. Information and Organization, 16(3), 191–211.
Smith, M.L., 2008. Testable theory development for small-N studies: critical realism and middle-range theory. CONF-IRM 2008 Proceedings. Paper 51.
Wagner, W. P., Najdawin, M. K., & Otto, J. (2000). An empirical investigation into the impact of ERP training on cross-functional education. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 1.
Wang, M. (2011). Integrating SAP to Information Systems 2010 Curriculum: Design and Delivery. Information Systems Educators Journal 2009, 9(5), October 2011, pp. 97-104.
Weiss, C.H., 1998. Evaluation. 2 edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Wynn, D., Jr., & Williams, C. (2012). Principles for conducting critical realist case study research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 787–810.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Monk, E.F., Lycett, M. Measuring business process learning with enterprise resource planning systems to improve the value of education. Educ Inf Technol 21, 747–768 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9352-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9352-6