Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How is language used to craft social presence in Facebook? A case study of an undergraduate writing course

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This quantitative content analysis examines the way social presence was created through original posts and comments in a Facebook group for an undergraduate writing course. The author adapted a well-known coding template and examined how course members—one instructor, two undergraduate teaching assistants and twenty-two students--used language and image to generate social presence. Language is categorized by purpose, and each category is a social presence indicator. The results show which social presence indicators are used more frequently by course members and that social presence is higher when certain social presence indicators are utilized. Since existing research indicates that social presence is associated with increased course satisfaction and learning, these findings provide practical knowledge for faculty seeking to increase social presence in their classes. This is a case study with a small population, but these results indicate the need for additional research to further explore how language and image are used to generate social presence in Facebook.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2014). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. The Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 12 (3–4). Retrieved from http://jaln.sloanconsortium.org/index.php/jaln.

  • Barczyk, C. C., & Duncan, D. G. (2013). Facebook in Higher Education Courses: An Analysis of Students’ Attitudes, Community of Practice, and Classroom Community. International Business and Management, 6(1), 1–11. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968%2Fj.ibm.1923842820130601.1165.

  • Beaudoin, M. (2002). Learning or lurking? tracking the ‘invisible’ online student. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(2), 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulu, S. T. (2012). Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds. Computers & Education, 58(1), 154–161. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.024.

  • Choi, A. (2013). Use of Facebook group feature to promote student collaboration. Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, USA, Retrieved from http://se.asee.org.

  • De Villiers, M. R. (2010). Academic use of a group on Facebook: Initial findings and perceptions. Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference, 173–190. Retrieved from http://umkn-dsp01.unisa.ac.za/.

  • DeSchryver, M., Mishra, P., Koehleer, M., & Francis, A. (2009, March). Moodle vs. Facebook: does using Facebook for discussions in an online course enhance perceived social presence and student interaction? Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 1, 329–336. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/noaccess/30612/.

  • Duncan, D. G., & Barczyk, C. C. (2013). Facebook in the University Classroom: Do Students Perceive that it Enhances Community of Practice and Sense of Community? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4 (3). Retrieved from http://www.ijbssnet.com/.

  • Gabre, H. G., & Kumar, G. (2012). The effects of perceived stress and Facebook on accounting students’ academic performance. Accounting & Finance Research, 1(2), 87–100. doi:10.5430/afr.v1n2p87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D., Anderson, T., Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. 2(2), 87–105. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/.

  • Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26. doi:10.1080/08923649709526970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurt, N. E., Moss, G. S., Bradley, C. L., Larson, L. R., Lovelace, M. D., & Prevost, L. B. (2012). The Facebook effect: College students’ perceptions of online discussions in the age of social networking. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 6 (2) 10. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/.

  • Judd, T. (2013). Making sense of multitasking: Key behaviours. Computers & Education, 63, 358–367. Retrieved from http://www.journals.elsevier.com/computers-and-education/.

  • Judd, T. (2014). Making sense of multitasking: The role of Facebook. Computers & Education, 70, 194–202. Retrieved from http://www.journals.elsevier.com/computers-and-education/.

  • Karpinski, A. C., Kirschner, P. A., Ozer, I., Mellott, J. A., & Ochwo, P. (2013). An exploration of social networking site use, multitasking, and academic performance among United States and European university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1182–1192. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237–1245. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, C., Wohn, D. Y., Vitak, J., Ellison, N. B., & Wash, R. (2011). Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. A. R. (2009). Utilizing Facebook: Immersing generation-Y students into first year university. The Journal of the Education Research Group of Adelaide, 1(2), 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 729–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, J. (2014). Facebook losing its edge among college-aged adults. Digiday. Retrieved from: http://digiday.com/platforms/social-platforms-college-kids-now.

  • Miller, S. T. (2013). Increasing Student Participation in Online Group Discussions Via Facebook. Astronomy Education Review, 12(1), doi: 10.3847/AER2012031.

  • Richardson, J., Swan, K., (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. The Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7 (1). Retrieved from http://jaln.sloanconsortium.org/index.php/jaln.

  • Rosen, L. D., Mark Carrier, L., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948–958. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 14(2).

  • Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319–332. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00130-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, A. R., Cortijo, V., & Javed, U. (2014). Students’ perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes. Computers & Education, 70, 138–149. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, J., & Greenbowe, T. (2009). The chemistry of Facebook: Using social networking to create an online community for the organic chemistry laboratory. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(4), 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/j/ISSN-1552-3233/.

  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommuncations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, E., & Gerbic, P. (2003, January). Investigating the impact of computer conferencing: Content analysis as a manageable research tool. Interact, Integrate, Impact: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) 495–503. Retrieved from http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30005105/stacey-investigatingtheimpact-2003.pdf.

  • Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Gentile, P., Archer, K., De Pasquale, D., & Nosko, A. (2012). Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers & Education, 58(1), 365–374. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Jeanine Guidry, doctoral student at Virginia Commonwealth University, for her comprehensive and exhaustive help with this research, and to Marcus Messner, for his support and assistance with this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Focused Inquiry, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1015 Floyd Avenue, Harris Hall 5175, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA

    Jessica Gordon

Authors
  1. Jessica Gordon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Gordon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gordon, J. How is language used to craft social presence in Facebook? A case study of an undergraduate writing course. Educ Inf Technol 21, 1033–1054 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9366-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9366-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation