Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

I like Facebook: Exploring Israeli high school chemistry teachers’ TPACK and self-efficacy beliefs

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this research was to examine how Israeli chemistry teachers at high school level use Facebook groups to facilitate learning. Two perspectives were used: Teachers’ TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) and the self-efficacy beliefs of chemistry teachers for using CLFG (chemistry learning Facebook groups). Three different case studies were chosen and qualitative and quantitative research tools were used to learn about the teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and knowledge. More specifically, a validated questionnaire for measuring teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for using Facebook and for integrating Facebook into teaching was developed. We show that the initial beliefs (not based on a real acquaintance of Facebook) were replaced by more realistic efficacy-beliefs after the teachers started to work with the CLFG and that the technological support provided to each teacher, together with their mastery experience, supported the development of strong self-efficacy beliefs regarding the use of CLFG. Teachers’ TPACK was investigated by analyzing their interviews and the interactions in their CLFG. We found that the notion regarding what constitutes learning in the CLFG had not changed during the experiment but rather, the teachers knew better how they can facilitate this leaning. In addition they better integrated links to videos and visualizations that supported understanding abstract chemistry concepts. Interestingly, the intervention that was conducted did not influence teachers’ perceptions of learning; however, it was found to serve as an additional tool for supporting their self-efficacy beliefs by providing vicarious experience for the teachers. We therefore recommend performing a longer intervention in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CLFG:

Chemistry Learning Facebook Groups

ICT:

Information and Communication Technology

LMS:

Learning Management System

PCK:

Pedagogical Content Knowledge

SNS:

Social Networks Sites

TPACK:

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge

VC:

Video Conference

References

  • Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abel, M. (2005). Find me on facebook… as long as you are not a faculty member or administrator. E-source for College Transitions, 3(3), 1–2.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656–1662. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 359–373. doi:10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 287–310. doi:10.1007/BF01663995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonder, R., Jonatan, M., Bar-Dov, Z., Benny, N., Rap, S., & Sakhnini, S. (2013). Can You Tube it? Providing chemistry teachers with technological tools and enhancing their efficacy beliefs. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 269–285. doi:10.1039/c3rp00001j.

  • Blonder, R., Benny, N., & Jones, M. G. (2014). Teaching self-efficacy of science teachers. In R. H. Evans, J. Luft, C. Czerniak & C. Pea (Eds.), The role of science teachers’ beliefs in international classrooms: From teacher actions to student learning (pp. 3–15). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

  • Boroditsky, L. (2011). How language shapes thought: The languages we speak affect our perceptions of the world. Scientific American, February, 63–65.

  • Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self‐efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499. doi:10.1002/tea.20131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cakiroglu, J., Capa-Aydin, Y., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2012). Science teaching efficacy beliefs. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (24th ed., pp. 477–495). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (Sixthth ed., pp. 253–263). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A. L., Marzano, R. (1987). Teaching the language of thinking. Educational Leadership (October), 29–33.

  • De Jong, O., Blonder, R., & Oversby, J. P. (2013). How to balance chemistry education between observing of phenomena and thinking in models. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Chemistry education: A practical guide and textbook for teachers, teacher trainees and student teachers (pp. 97–126). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (1998). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 47–78). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Hershkovitz, A. (2012). A case study of Israeli higher-education institutes sharing scholarly information with the community via social networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 15, 58–68. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Hershkovitz, A. (2015). Teacher-Student Relationship in the Facebook-era. In P. Isaias, P. Kommers, T. Issa (Eds.). The evolution of the internet in the business sector: Web 1.0 to Web 3.0 (pp. 145-172). PA: IGI Global.

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 1–19. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569–582. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/edu/76/4/569.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glesne, C. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosseck, G., Bran, R., & Tiru, L. (2011). Dear teacher, what should I write on my wall? a case study on academic uses of facebook. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1425–1430. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (1981). Measurement of the responsibility teachers assume for academic successes and failures in the classroom. Journal of Teacher Education, 32, 44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 63–69. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(88)90025-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25–45. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/articles/v9i1science1.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAARETZ. (2013). Israelis ‘like’ Facebook more than any other nation. Retrieved from http://www.haaretz.com/business/israelis-like-facebook-more-than-any-other-nation.premium-1.525547.

  • Hammond, T. C., & Manfra, M. M. (2009). Giving, prompting, making: Aligning technology and pedagogy within TPACK for social studies instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 160–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (2004). Case study research. In C.  Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 323–333). London: Sage.

  • Henson, R. K., Kogan, L. R., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2001). A reliability generalization study of the teacher efficacy scale and related instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(3), 404–420. doi:10.1177/00131640121971284.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hershkovitz, A., & Forkosh–Baruch, A. (2013). Student–teacher relationship in the facebook era: The student perspective. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 23(1), 33–52. doi:10.1504/IJCEELL.2013.051765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F. (2011). Students’ and teachers’ use of facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 662–676. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISTRATEGYLABS (2014). 3 Million teens leave Facebook in 3 years: The 2014 Facebook demographic report. Retrieved from http://istrategylabs.com/2014/01/3-million-teens-leave-facebook-in-3-years-the-2014-facebook-demographic-report/.

  • Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junco, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237–1245. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M., Bong, M., Usher, E. L., Chong, W. H., Huan, V. S., Wong, I. Y., & Georgiou, T. (2009). Exploring the validity of a teachers’ self-efficacy scale in five countries. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 67–76. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, G. (2011). Assimilation of ICT in Israel: Challenges and implementation. In D. Chen & G. Kurtz (Eds.), ICT, learning and teaching (pp. 11–32). Or Yehuda: The Center fpr Academic Studies (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., & Pitts, J. P. (2009). Does it really matter? using virtual office hours to enhance student-faculty interaction. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20, 175–185. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/200118830/fulltextPDF?accountid=14950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I’ll see you on “facebook”: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1–17. doi:10.1080/03634520601009710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2009). The effects of teacher self-disclosure via facebook on teacher credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 175–183. doi:10.1080/17439880902923655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444–453. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meishar-Tal, H., Kurtz, G., & Pieterse, E. (2012). Facebook groups as LMS: A case study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. A., Coover, D., & Owen, S. V. (1989). Development and validation of the computer self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 893–899. doi:10.1177/001316448904900412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nana. (2014). 10 years of facebook: A decade in figures. Retrieved from http://net.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=1035380 (in Hebrew).

  • Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509–523. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, P. B., Hunt, S. K., & Lippert, L. R. (2004). Mediated immediacy: A language of affiliation in a technological age. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 464–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1993). Preservice teachers’ beliefs: A focus for teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 15, 45–54. doi:10.1080/01626620.1993.10734409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227–238. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, J., Wilson, S. E., & Becket, G. (2013). Facebook use in the learning environment: do students want this? Learning Media and Technology, 38(3), 345–350. doi:10.1080/17439884.2013.788027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher’s science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625–637. doi:10.1002/sce.3730740605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, J., Greenbowe, T. (2009). The chemistry of Facebook: using social networking to create an online community for the organic chemistry. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(4), Retrieved from http://gator.uhd.edu/%7Ewilliams/AT/ChemOfFB.htm.

  • Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shroyer, G., Riggs, I., & Enochs, L. (2014). Measurement of science teachers’ efficacy beliefs. In R. H. Evans, J. Luft, C. Czerniak, & C. Pea (Eds.), The role of science teachers’ beliefs in international classrooms: From teacher actions to student learning (pp. 103–118). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 420–433. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teclehaimanot, B., & Hickman, T. (2011). Student-teacher interaction on facebook: What students find appropriate. TechTrends, 55(3), 19–30. doi:10.1007/s11528-011-0494-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805. doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00036-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk-Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248. doi:10.3102/00346543068002202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78, 751–796. doi:10.3102/0034654308321456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 428–438. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01195.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma, W. (2000). Research methods in education: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk Hoy, A. W., Hoy, W. K., & Davis, H. A. (2009). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. In K. R. W. A. Wigfield (Ed.), Educational psychology handbook series. Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 627–653). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmi, E., Puterkovsky, M., & Bagno, E. (2013). Knowledge integration while interacting with an online troubleshooting activity. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 463–474. doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9406-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J. B. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel

    Ron Blonder & Shelley Rap

Authors
  1. Ron Blonder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shelley Rap
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron Blonder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blonder, R., Rap, S. I like Facebook: Exploring Israeli high school chemistry teachers’ TPACK and self-efficacy beliefs. Educ Inf Technol 22, 697–724 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9384-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9384-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation