Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Having a go: Looking at teachers’ experience of risk-taking in technology integration

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Risk is an integral part of change. Technology-related change in teachers’ practice is guided by confidence engaging in and beliefs about integration. However, it is also affected by how teachers feel about taking risks, experimenting and change. This paper presents a theoretical framework of affect and emotion to understand how teachers experience and take risks in technology integration. The emphasis of this approach is on how individual teachers cope with risk and how it relates to learning. To illustrate the use of this approach, one teachers’ experience with technology integration over 3 years in an Australian one-to-one laptop program is presented. Analysis of their experience using technology and experimenting through emotions of anxiety and happiness reveals the development of specific coping strategies to support integration. Successful coping strategies resulted in decreased concern about using new technologies in teaching and increasingly positive beliefs about student learning through technologies. Implications for supporting change and experimentation are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher moral, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39, 395–414. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00075-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. J. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 291–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celik, V., & Yesilyurt, E. (2013). Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Computers & Education, 60(1), 148–158. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. (2012). Digital Education Revolution - Overview. Retrieved September 20, 2013, from http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/DigitalEducationRevolution/Pages/default.aspx.

  • Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). How can we know the risks We face ? selection is a social process. Risk Analysis, 2(2), 49–51. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01365.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. doi:GALE|A221849729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2003). Judgment and decision making: The dance of affect and reason. In S. L. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research (pp. 327–364). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2000). Episodic interviewing. In M. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound (pp. 75–92). London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackbarth, G., Grover, V., & Yi, M. Y. (2003). Computer playfulness and anxiety: Positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived use. Information and Management, 40(3), 221–232. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00006-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. E. (2013). Evaluating change processes: Assessing extent of implementation (constructs, methods and implications). Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), 264–289. doi:10.1108/09578231311311474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, G., & Rowe, G. (2008). A characterisation of the methodology of qualitative research on the nature of perceived risk: Trends and omissions. Journal of Risk Research, 11(5), 617–643. doi:10.1080/13669870701875776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. U. E. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155–192. doi:10.1080/0022027032000276961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, S. K. (2011). Affect and acceptability: Exploring teachers’ technology-related risk perceptions. Educational Media International, 48(4), 261–273. doi:10.1080/09523987.2011.632275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, S. K. (2013). Risk-aversion: Understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(3), 357–372. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2013.802995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: Exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education, 55(3), 937–944. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N., & Dickson, P. R. (1994). How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self-efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 385–400. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb00810.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (2006). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Fevre, D. M. (2014). Barriers to implementing pedagogical change: The role of teachers’ perceptions of risk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38(0), 56–64. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P., Zhao, Y., Tondeur, J., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Bridging the gap: Technology trends and use of technology in schools. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (1999). Introduction: Risk and sociocultural theory. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives (pp. 1–11). Cambridge: University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1523–1537. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrotta, C. (2013). Do school-level factors influence the educational benefits of digital technology? a critical analysis of teachers’ perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 314–327. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01304.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponticell, J. A. (2003). Enhancers and inhibitors of teacher risk taking: A case study. Peabody Journal of Education, 78(3), 5–24. doi:10.1207/S15327930PJE7803_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, B., Renn, O., & Mumpower, J. (2000). Risk perception research - an introduction. In O. Renn & B. Rohrmann (Eds.), Cross-cultural risk perceptions: A survey of empirical studies (13th ed., pp. 11–54). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Short, P. M., Miller-Wood, D. J., & Jonhson, P. E. (1991). Risk taking and teacher involvement in decision making. Education, 112(1), 84–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., & Lofstedt, R. (2000). Introduction and overview. In P. Slovic (Ed.), The perception of risk. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & McGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., & Kirby, L. D. (2009). Putting appraisal in context: Toward a relational model of appraisal and emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1352–1372. doi:10.1080/02699930902860386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Veen, K., & Sleegers, P. (2006). How does it feel? Teachers’ emotions in a context of change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(1), 85–111. doi:10.1080/00220270500109304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Västfjäll, D., Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2014). The affect heuristic, mortality salience, and risk: Domain-specific effects of a natural disaster on risk-benefit perception. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 55(6), 527–532. doi:10.1111/sjop.12166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S.-K., Hsu, H.-Y., Campbell, T., Coster, D., & Longhurst, M. (2014). An investigation of middle school science teachers and students use of technology inside and outside of classrooms: Considering whether digital natives are more technology savvy than their teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(6), 637–662. doi:10.1007/s11423-014-9355-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M., Zheng, B., Niiya, M., Cotten, S., & Farkas, G. (2014). Balancing the One-to-One equation: Equity and access in three laptop programs. Equity and Excellence in Education, 47(1), 46–62. doi:10.1080/10665684.2014.866871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263–290. doi:10.1002/bdm.414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilfong, J. D. (2006). Computer anxiety and anger: The impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1001–1011. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165–205. doi:10.3102/00028312039001165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J. F., Stone, E. R., & Holding, D. H. (1992). The risk construct. In J. F. Yates (Ed.), Risk-taking behavior (pp. 1–26). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840. doi:10.3102/00028312040004807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia

    Sarah K. Howard & Amanda Gigliotti

Authors
  1. Sarah K. Howard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amanda Gigliotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah K. Howard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Howard, S.K., Gigliotti, A. Having a go: Looking at teachers’ experience of risk-taking in technology integration. Educ Inf Technol 21, 1351–1366 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9386-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9386-4

Keywords