Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Self-regulated learning and the role of ePortfolios in business studies

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Students’ work in ePortfolios was assessed through a case study supported by observation techniques and eQuestionnaires to gather data from a sample of eighty students over a period of 4 years (20 students per academic year). The main purpose of the study was to explore whether ePortfolios can be used efficiently to support the learning process of postgraduate business students taking a course where finance modules were a major component. The use, role and learning value of integrating ePortfolios into the learning process in a higher education institution was analysed over the period of study. The empirical findings suggest that ePortfolios could be used to facilitate and enhance students’ self-regulated learning. Additionally, the role of the instructor was found to be fundamental during early stages of the learning process to guide and coach students on how to use the tool. This role diminished as students became familiar with the course requirements. Overall, students judged the ePortfolio as being positive to their education, noting a significant improvement in their learning experience when compared to a traditional learning approach. The evidence suggests that ePortfolios could be used to support technical and complex modules in a controlled environment. At the same time, ePortfolios were found to be flexible enough to give students creative space by helping them to integrate their own ideas and views through their learning process. Students were also able to offer their instructors feedback on their learning achievements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Asghar, M. (2012). The lived experience of formative assessment practice in a British university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36(2), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5, 243–260. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford J. D., Brown A. L., Cocking R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

  • Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge, D., Cambridge, Yancey B.K., Stylus. (Eds.) (2009). Electronic Portfolios 2.0: Emergent Research on Implementation and Impact

  • Chambers, S., & Wickersham, L. (2007). The electronic portfolio journey: a year later. Education, 127(3), 351–360.

  • Cross, K. P., & Angelo, T. A. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, W. W., III. (1998). Writing a course portfolio for an introductory survey course in American history. In P. Hutchings (Ed.), The course portfolio: How faculty can examine their teaching to advance practice and improve student learning (pp. 19–24). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lange, P., Suwardy, T., & Mavondo, F. (2003). Integrating a virtual learning environment into an introductory accounting course: determinants of student motivation. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 12(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCorte, E. (1996). New perspectives on learning and teaching in higher education. In A. Burgen (Ed.), Goals and purposes of higher education in the 21st century. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diller, K. R., & Phelps, S. F. (2008). Learning outcomes, portfolios, and rubrics, oh my! Authentic assessment of an information literacy program. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 8(1), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doig, B., Illsley, B., McLuckie, J., & Parsons, R. (2006). Using eportfolios to enhance reflective learning and development. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of research on ePortfolios (pp. 158–167). Hershey: Idea Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • EHEA (2009). The bologna process 2020 - The European Higher Education AReas in the New Decade, communiqué, 18 May 2007.

  • EHEA (2012). Making the most of our potential: Consolidating the European higher education area, Bucharest communiqué, Bucharest, 26 and 27 April 2012.

  • Gough, D.A. Kiwan, D. Sutcliffe, K. Simpson, D. Houghton, N. (2003). A systematic map and synthesis review of the effectiveness of personal development planning for improving student learning. In, Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London. At http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/EPPIWeb/home.aspx?page=reel/review_groups/EPPI/LTSN/LTSN_intro.htm (accessed 21/10/2010).

  • Gülbahar, Y., & Tinmaz, H. (2006). Implementing project-based learning and e-portfolio assessment in an undergraduate course. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 309–327.

  • Heiss, M. (1998). A course portfolio for a colloquium in twentieth-century American foreign relations. In P. Hutchings (Ed.), The course portfolio. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Yang, S., Chiang, P., & Tzeng, L. (2012). Building an e-portfolio learning model: Goal orientation and metacognitive strategies. Knowledge Management & ELearning: An International Journal (KM&EL), 4(1), 16--36.

  • Hutchings, P. (1998). The course portfolio: How faculty can examine their teaching to advance practice and improve student learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, B., Hepplestone, S. (2011). Examining increased flexibility in assessment formats. iFirst Article. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–13. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.573842.

  • Janssen, M. J., Riksen-Walraven, J. M., & van Dijk, J. P. M. (2002). Enhancing the quality of interaction between deafblind children and their educators. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 14, 87–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, R. (2013). The role of self-assessment in student’s writing portfolios: a classroom investigation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Published online: 26 Nov 2013.

  • Langsam, D. (1998). A course portfolio for midcareer reflection. In P. Hutchings (Ed.), The course portfolio: How faculty can examine their teaching to advance practice and student learning (pp. 57–63). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leese, M. (2009). Out of class - out of mind? The use of a virtual learning environment to encourage student engagement in out of class activities. British Journal of Educational Technology (BJET), 40(1), 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Fernández, O., & Rodríguez-Illera, J. L. (2009). Investigating university students’ adaptation to a digital learner course portfolio. Computers & Education, 52(3), 608–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, S. V. (2012). Assessment is for learning: supporting feedback. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22, 227–245. doi:10.1007/s10798-011-9195-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, E., Abrami, P., Wade, C., Aslan, O., & Deault, L. (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: teaching and learning with ePEARL. Computers & Education, 55(1), 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New, J. R., Clawson, J. G., & Coughlan, R. S. (2000). The course portfolio: A tool for improving the scholarship and practice of OB teaching? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the organizational behavior teaching conference. Georgia: Carrollton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D. J. (1997). Research on learning and higher education teaching, UCoSDA Briefing Paper 45. Sheffield: Universities and Colleges Staff Development Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and selfregulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, B., & Whelan, B. (2011). Designing an e-portfolio for assurance of learning focusing on adoptability and learning analytics. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6), 1026–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In J. C. Smart & W. G. Tierney (Eds.), Higher Education: handbook of theory and research (Vol. XVII). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, B., & Francis, B. (2005). Examining assessment in higher education: assessment as a socially situated practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, C. (2002). The impact of assessment on student learning. How can the research literature practically help to inform the development of departmental assessment strategies and learner-centred assessment practices? Active Learning in Higher Education, 3, 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77–84.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson-Beck, V. (2011). Assessing classroom assessment techniques. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 125–132. doi:10.1177/1469787411402482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, T. F. (1996). Porfolio Assessment strategies for grading first-year university physics students in the USA. Physics Education, 31(5), 329–333.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 325–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Konsky, B., & Oliver, B. (2012). The iPortfolio: measuring uptake and effective use of an institutional electronic portfolio in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(1), 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2009). Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way, D. G. (1992). Teaching evaluation handbook. Ithaca: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., & Scalise, K. (2006). Assessment to improve learning in higher education: the BEAR assessment system. Higher Education, 52, 635–663. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-7263-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wray, S. (2007). Supporting teacher candidates during the electronic portfolio development process. E-Learning and Digital Media, 4(4), 454–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yancey, K. B. (2009). Electronic portfolios a decade into the twenty-first century: what we know, what we need to know. Peer Review, 11(1), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubizarreta, J., & Millis, B. J. (2009). The learning portfolio: Reflective practice for improving student learning (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Accounting and Finance, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland

    Lucía Morales & Valentina Tarkovska

  2. Finance and Accounting Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló de la Plana, Spain

    Amparo Soler-Domínguez

Authors
  1. Lucía Morales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amparo Soler-Domínguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Valentina Tarkovska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucía Morales.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morales, L., Soler-Domínguez, A. & Tarkovska, V. Self-regulated learning and the role of ePortfolios in business studies. Educ Inf Technol 21, 1733–1751 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9415-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9415-3

Keywords