Abstract
Female student representation in Computing and Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Tertiary education is under-researched in a number of countries including Greece, while studies on female secondary level education teacher representation in Computing and STEM have not yet been reported. This study focuses on the investigation of gender representation of tertiary-level education students (freshmen, graduates, master’s degree graduates and PhD’s) and of secondary-level education teachers in Computing and STEM education during the decade 2002–2012 in Greece. A quantitative study was conducted taking into account appropriate data that emerged from the Hellenic Statistical Authority which is the national statistical service of Greece. During the studied decade:(a) Females were less prevalent than males at all levels of study in Computing and Engineering, (b) the number of males did not exceed that of females in Physics (freshmen, graduates and master’s degree holders) or in Mathematics (graduates),(c) Female teachers were less prevalent than males in Computing and STEM,(d) Computing female schoolteachers are better represented at all levels of secondary education compared to the representation of their female counterparts in the rest of the disciplines of STEM education,(e) There is no pipeline shrinkage between female freshmen and graduates of undergraduate studies in Computing and STEM and there was also no female dropout from level (undergraduate studies) to level (master’s degree studies) in Greek Computing, Physics and Engineering departments. It seems that the main problem is recruitment and not retention in Computing and STEM, despite female under-representation in most of these disciplines.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Beckwith, L., Burnett, M., Grigoreanu, V., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2006). Gender HCI: what about the software? Computer, 39(11), 97–101.
Berdousis, I., & Kordaki, M. (2015). Gender Differences and Achievements in Computer Science: a Case Study. 6th World Conference on Educational Sciences. University of Malta, Italy: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191(2), 1161–1166.
Beyer, S., Rynes, K., Perrault, J., Hay, K., & Haller, S. (2003). Gender differences in computer science students. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(1), 49–53.
Brainard, S. G., & Carlin, L. (1998). A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 369–375.
Camp, T. (2012). Computing, we have a problem…. ACM Inroads, 3(4), 34–40.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morisson, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
Cohoon, J. M. (2002). Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 48–52.
Cohoon, J. M., & Aspray, W. (2006). A critical review of the research on women’s participation in postsecondary computing education. In J. M. Cohoon, & W. Aspray (Eds.), Women and information technology: Research on under-representation (pp. 137–179). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Denner, J., Werner, L., & Ortiz, E. (2012). Computer games created by middle school girls: can they be used to measure understanding of computer science concepts? Computers & Education, 58(1), 240–249.
Guadagno, R. E., & Cialdini, R. B. (2002). Online persuasion: an examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 38–51.
Gürer, D., & Camp, T. (2001). Investigating the incredible shrinking pipeline for women in computer science. Final Report–NSF Project, 9812016, from http://womendev.acm.org/archives/documents/finalreport.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2015
Gürer, D., & Camp, T. (2002). An ACM-W literature review on women in computing. ACM SIGCE in Roads, special Issue: Women and Computing, 34(2), 121–127.
Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St Rose, A. (2010). Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. American Association of University Women. 1111 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. http://www.aauw.org/files/2013/02/Why-So-Few-Women-in-Science-Technology-Engineering-and-Mathematics.pdf. Last accessed 8 July 2015
Hüsing, T., Korte, W. B., Fonstad, N., Lanvin, B., Welsum, D. V., Cattaneo, G., & Lifonti, R. (2013). E-skills for competitiveness and innovation vision, roadmap and foresight scenarios. Final report, European Commission. http://eskillsvision.eu/fileadmin/eSkillsVision/documents/VISION%20Final%20Report.pdf. Last accessed 8 July 2015
Ilias, A., & Kordaki, M. (2006). Undergraduate studies in computer science and engineering: gender issues. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(2), 81–85.
Kaminski, D., & Geisler, C. (2012). Survival analysis of faculty retention in science and engineering by gender. Science, 335(6070), 864–866.
Kimbrough, A. M., Guadagno, R. E., Muscanell, N. L., & Dill, J. (2013). Gender differences in mediated communication: women connect more than do men. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 896–900.
Kordaki, M. & Berdousis, I. (2013). Course Selection in Computer Science: Gender Differences. In Proceedings of 5th World Conference on Educational Sciences, 05–08 February 2013, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116 (21), February 2014, 4770–4774.
Ladner, R., VanDeGrift, T. (2011). Introduction to Special Issue: Broadening Participation in Computing Education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 11(2), 6:1–4
Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 586–601.
Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2003). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge: MIT press.
Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: the Carnegie Mellon experience. ACM SIGCE in roads, special issue: Women and Computing, 34(2), 79–83.
Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2011). Gender differences in using social networks. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(2), 133–139.
Ohland, M. W., Sheppard, S. D., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., & Layton, R. A. (2008). Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 259–278.
Rich, L., Perry, H., & Guzdial, M. (2004). A CS1 course designed to address interests of women. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(1), 190–194.
Sax, L.J., Jacobs, J. & Riggers, T. (2010). Women’s Representation in Science and Technology (STEM) Fields of Study, 1976–2006. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE), November 2010, Indianapolis, Indiana. http://www.ashe.ws/images/GenderandSTEM.doc. Last accessed 8 July 2015.
Solis, H. L., & Hall, K. (2009). Women in the labor force: A databook. US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Report, 1018, 1–101. http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2009.pdf. Last accessed 8 July 2015.
Taylor, M. (2009). Women outnumber men on social networking sites. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved at 23/12/2014, from.http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/10/07/women-outnumber- men-on-social-networking-sites/>. Last accessed 8 July 2015.
Townsend, G. C. (2002). People who make a difference: mentors and role models. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 57–61.
Vogt, C. M., Hocevar, D., & Hagedorn, L. S. (2007). A social cognitive construct validation: determining women’s and men’s success in engineering programs. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 337–364.
Weiser, E. B. (2000). Gender differences in internet use patterns and internet application preferences: a two-sample comparison. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3(2), 167–178.
Wolf, W. A. (2006). Diversity in engineering. Women in Engineering ProActive Network. http://journals.psu.edu/index.php/wepan/article/viewFile/58095/57783. Last accessed 8 July 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kordaki, M., Berdousis, I. Computing and STEM in Greece: Gender representation of students and teachers during the decade 2002/2012. Educ Inf Technol 22, 101–124 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9432-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9432-2