Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of computer assisted teaching of geometry shapes and an interactionist approach to teaching geometry in kindergarten versus other more traditional teaching methods. Our research compares the improvement of the children’s geometrical competence using two teaching approaches. The first one employs our ICT oriented learning method specifically targeting Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) and the van Hiele model for geometry shapes. The second method is based on the interactionist approach of teaching children in kindergarten. The sample consisted of 139 Greek kindergarten children from Crete. We conducted interventions based on the above two methods, in two experimental groups. The first experimental group consisted of 50 children who were taught geometry shapes according to the principles of Realistic Mathematics Education with the use of appropriate educational software. The second experimental group consisted of 45 children who were taught about geometry shapes with an interactionist approach without the use of computers. The control group consisted of 44 children and was taught about geometry shapes following the ways teachers chose to put the basic pedagogical principles of Curriculum for kindergarten into practice without the use of ICT. Children in all groups were pre-tested and post-tested for their geometry performance. The results showed that the teaching approaches of our interventions, the one with the additional use of ICT and the interactionist one, contribute significantly more to the development of kindergarten children’s geometry competence as compared to other traditional methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alavinia, P., Aslrasouli, M., & Rostami, M. (2014). Reappraisal of the pivotal role of social interactionist perspectives in furthering learners’ reading, attitudinal dexterities. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 153–160.
Andronache, D., Bocos, M., & Neculau, C. (2015). A systemic-interactionist model to design a competency-based curriculum. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 715–721.
Balfanz, R., Ginsburg, H. P., & Greenes, C. (2003). The big math for little kids early childhood mathematics program. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(5), 264–268.
Bobis, J., Clarke, B., Clarke, D., Thomas, G., Wright, R., Young-Loveridge, J., et al. (2005). Supporting teachers in the development of young children’s mathematical thinking: three large scale cases. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(3), 27–57.
Bruce, T. (1997). Early childhood education. London: Hodder.
Chou, S.-W., & Liu, C.-H. (2005). Learning effectiveness in a web-based virtual learning environment: a learner control perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 65–76.
Clements, D. H. (2002). Computers in early childhood mathematics. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(2), 160–181.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004). Building blocks for early childhood mathematics. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 181–189.
Clements, D. H., Swaminathan, S., Zeitler-Hannibal, M., & Sarama, J. (1999). Young Children’s concepts of shape. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 192–212.
Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Yelland, N. J., & Glass, B. (2008). Learning and teaching geometry with computers in the elementary and middle school. In M. K. Heid & G. W. Blume (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Volume 1, Research syntheses (pp. 109–154). New York: Information Age Publishing.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th Edition). London: Routledge.
Curtis, A. (1998). A curriculum for the preschool child: Learning to learn. London: Routledge.
Dimakos, G., & Zaranis, N. (2010). The influence of the Geometer's sketchpad on the geometry achievement of greek school students. The Teaching of Mathematics, 13(2), 113–124.
Dissanayake, S. N., Karunananda, A. S., & Lekamge, G. D. (2007). Use of computer technology for the teaching of primary school mathematics. OUSL Journal, 4, 33–52.
Dwyer, J. (2007). Computer-based learning in a primary school: differences between the early and later years of primary schooling. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 89–103. doi:10.1080/13598660601111307.
Finegan, C., & Austin, J. (2002). Developmentally appropriate technology for young children. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 1, 87–102.
Furner, J. M., & Marinas, C. A. (2007). Geometry sketching software for elementary children: Easy as 1, 2, 3. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 83–91.
Gersten, R., Jordan, N., & Flojo, J. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293–304.
Ginsburg, H. P. (1999). Challenging preschool education: meeting the intellectual needs of all children. In B. Presseisen (Ed.), Teaching for intelligence I: a collection of articles (pp. 287–304). Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight.
Ginsburg, H. P., Galanter, M., & Morgenlander, M. (2004). Big math for little kids workshops. New York, NY: Teachers College Innovations.
Howie, S., & Seugnet Blignaut, A. (2009). South Africa’s readiness to integrate ICT into mathematics and science pedagogy in secondary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 14, 345–363. doi:10.1007/s10639-009-9105-0.
Kaasila, R., & Lauriala, A. (2010). Towards a collaborative, interactionist model of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 854–862.
Lee, Y. (2009). Pre-K children’s interaction with educational software programs: an observation of capabilities and levels of engagement. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 18(3), 289–309.
Lepola, J., Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2004). Understanding the development of subnormal performance in children from a motivational-interactionist perspective. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 28, 145–189.
Livingstone, S. (2012). Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 9–24. doi:10.1080/03054985.2011.577938.
Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (1996). Children doing mathematics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Satlow, E., & Newcombe, N. S. (1998). When is a triangle not a triangle? Young children's conceptions of geometric shapes. Cognitive Development, 13, 547–559.
Smith, A. (2011). Respecting children’s rights and agency, theoretical insights into ethical research procedure. In D. Harcourt, B. Perry, & T. Waller (Eds.), Researching young children’s perspectives, Debating the ethics and dilemmas of educational research with children (pp. 11–25). Abingdon: Routledge.
Starkey, P., Klein, A., & Wakeley, A. (2004). Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 99–120.
Treffers, A. (1991). Didactical background of a mathematics program for primary education. In L. Streefland (Ed.), Realistic mathematics education in primary school (pp. 21–56). Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute/CD-ß.
Trouche, L., & Drijvers, P. (2010). Handheld technology for mathematics education: flashback into the future. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(7), 667–681. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0269-2.
Vale, C., & Leder, G. (2004). Student views of computer-based mathematics in the middle years: does gender make a difference? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 287–312.
Van den Brink, F. J. (1991). Realistic arithmetic education for young children. In L. Streefland (Ed.), Realistic Mathematics Education in Primary School (pp. 77–92). Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute/CD-ß.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2001). Realistic Mathematics Education as work in progress. In F. L. Lin (Ed.), Common Sense in Mathematics Education, Proceedings of 2001, The Netherlands and Taiwan Conference on Mathematics Education, Taipei, Taiwan, (1–43), 19–23 November 2001.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Buys, K. (Eds.) (2008). Young children learn measurement and geometry. A learning-teaching trajectory with intermediate attainment targets for the lower grades in primary school. Rotterdam/Tapei: Sense Publishers.
Walcott, C., Mohr, D., & Kastberg, S. (2009). Making sense of shape: an analysis of children’s written responses. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(1), 30–40.
Wong, W. K., Hsu, S. C., Wu, S. H., Lee, C. W., & Hsu, W. L. (2007). LIM-G: learner-initiating instruction model based on cognitive knowledge for geometry word problem comprehension. Computers & Education, 48(4), 582–601.
Wong, W. K., Yin, S. K., Yang, H. H., & Cheng, Y. H. (2011). Using computer-assisted multiple representations in learning geometry proofs. Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 43–54.
Zaranis, N. (2011). The influence of ICT on the numeracy achievement of Greek kindergarten children, In A. Moreira M.J. Loureiro A. Balula F. Nogueira L. Pombo L. Pedro P. Almeida (Eds.) Proceedings of the 61st International Council for Educational Media and the XIII International Symposium on Computers in Education (ICEM&SIIE'2011) Joint Conference, 390–399, University of Aveiro, Portugal, 28-30September 2011.
Zaranis, N. (2012). The use of ICT in Preschool Education for geometry teaching. In R. Pintó V. López & C. Simarro (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Based Learning in Science, Learning Science in the Society of Computers, 256–262, Centre for Research in Science and Mathematics Education (CRECIM), Barcelona, Spain, 26–29 June 2012.
Zaranis, N., & Oikonomidis, V. (2009). ICT in Preschool Education. Athens: Grigoris Publications [Text in Greek].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaranis, N., Synodi, E. A comparative study on the effectiveness of the computer assisted method and the interactionist approach to teaching geometry shapes to young children. Educ Inf Technol 22, 1377–1393 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9500-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9500-2