Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Access and perceived ICT usability among students with disabilities attending higher education institutions

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An increasing number of students with disabilities are attending higher education. These students might face various difficulties coping with academic skills and with learning methods compared to students without disabilities. Integrating information and communication technologies (ICTs) in academic studies may be effective and constructive for students with and without various disabilities, as ICTs can provide students with adaptive ways to compensate for disabilities and enable them to improve learning. The present study examined students’ knowledge of and accessibility to ICTs and it examined students’ perceptions of the ICTs used by professors teaching in a face-to-face traditional postsecondary educational institute (in Canada) and a distance/blended learning higher education institute (in Israel). The sample included 309 Canadian students and 963 Israeli students who completed questionnaires regarding ICT usage, accessibility, and perceived use by professors. Findings reveal that Israeli students reported higher use and greater accessibility of ICTs and they also reported higher use of ICTs by professors. For both groups of students – those with and without LD/ADHD - accessibility to ICTs was predicted by self-reported knowledge and use of ICTs, professors’ ICT use, gender and nationality. The study’s findings and its implications are likely to be important for promoting access to ICTs for students with and without disabilities in both the traditional higher education modality and in distance/ blended learning contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akturk, A. O. (2014). A study on epistemological beliefs of community students and their self-efficacy beliefs regarding educational use of the internet. Education, 134(3), 426–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragon, S. R., Johnson, S. D., & Shaik, N. (2002). The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online versus face-to-face environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 16, 227–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avidov-Ungar, O., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2016). Perceptions of teacher educators regarding ICT implementation in Israeli teacher education institutes. Presented at AERA Conference, Washington, DC, USA.

  • Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., & Ok, M. W. (2014). Assistive technology for individuals with learning disabilities, in G. E. Lancioni & N.N. Singh (Eds), Assistive technologies for people with diverse abilities (pp. 251–276, Chp. 9). Springer Science and Business Media, New York.

  • Canadian Statistics: Learning disabilities among Canadians (2012). Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-654-x/89-654-x2014003-eng.htm. Accessed June 10, 2017.

  • Crivelli, V., Thomsom, M., & Andersson, B. (2004). Using information and communication technology to help dyslexic children and adults. In G. Reid & A. Fawcett (Eds.), Dyslexia in context. Research, policy and practice (pp. 304–322). London: Whurr.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cuadrado-García, M., Ruiz-Molina, M. E., & Montoro-Pons, J. D. (2010). Are there gender differences in e-learning use and assessment? Evidence from an interuniversity online project in Europe. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 367–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichten, C.S., Jorgensen, S., Havel, A., & Barile, M. with the Collaboration of Landry, M.E., Fiset, D., Juhel, J.C., Tétreault, S., Ferraro, V., Chwojka, C., Nguyen, M.N., Alapin, I., Arcuri, R., Huard, G., Amsel, R. (2006). College students with disabilities: Their future and success - Final report presented to FQRSC. Montréal: Adaptech Research Network, Dawson College. (Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) (ED491585).

  • Fuller, M., Bradley, A., & Healey, M. (2004). Incorporating disabled students within an inclusive higher education environment. Disability & Society, 19(5), 455–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, J. A., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Mohler, P. (2003). Cross-cultural survey methods. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, T., & Kariv, D. (2004). Coping experience among students in higher education. Educational Studies, 30(4), 441–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, T., & Olenik-Shemesh, D. (2012). Students with learning disabilities in higher education: Use and accessibility of assistive technology, website courses and their correlation to students' hope and well-being. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 308–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, T., & Precel, K. (2003). Students with learning disabilities in higher education: Academic strategies profile. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(3), 248–258. doi:10.1177/002221940303600304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilomaki, L. (2011). Does gender have a role in ICT among Finnish teachers and students? Scandinavian Journal of Education Research, 55(3), 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kioko, V., & Makoelle, T. M. (2014). Inclusion in higher education: Learning experiences of disabled students at university. International Education Studies, 7, 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitsantas, A., & Chow, A. (2007). College students’ perceived threat and preference for seeking help in traditional, distributed and distance learning environments. Computers & Education, 48(3), 383–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubiatko, M. (2013). The comparison of different age groups on the attitudes toward and use of ICT. Education Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 1263–1272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Learning Disabilities Association of Ontario: Learning Disabilities Statistics (2015). Retrieved from: http://www.ldao.ca/introduction-to-ldsadhd/articles/about-lds/learning-disabilities-statistics.

  • National Center for Education Statistics (2012). U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=60.

  • Neidorf, R. (2006). Teach beyond your reach: An instructors guide to developing and running successful distance learning classes, workshops, training sessions and more. Medford: New Jersey.

  • Newman, L. A., & Madaus, J. W. (2015). An analysis of factors related to receipt of accommodations and services by postsecondary students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 208–219. doi:10.1177/0741932515572912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino, M., & Mortari, L. (2014). The inclusion of students with dyslexia in higher education: A systematic review using narrative synthesis. Dyslexia, 20, 346–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. B., Crittenden, L. A., & Crittenden, J. C. (2011). Students with disabilities and online learning: A cross-institutional study of perceived satisfaction with accessibility compliance and services. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 242–250. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumble, G. (1989). ‘Open learning’, ‘distance learning’, and the misuse of language. Open Learning, 4(2), 28–36.

  • Shinyi, L., Tse-Hua, S., & Ruiling, L. (2013). ICT proficiency and gender: A validation on training and development. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, T. K., Waghmare, L. S., Jagzape, A. T., Rawekar, A. T., Quazi, N. Z., Mishra, V., & P. (2014). Role of information communication technology in higher education: Learners perspective in rural medical schools. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 8(6), XC01–XC06. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2014/8371.4448.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Open University of Israel (2017). Retrieved from http://www.openu.ac.il/en/pages/default.aspx. Accessed June 10, 2017.

  • UNESCO (2009). Guide to measuring information and communication technologies (ICT) in education. UNESCO Institute for Statistics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Retrieved from: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Library/Documents/ICT_Guide_EN_v19_reprintwc.pdf.

  • Van Jaarsveldt, D. E., & Ndeya-Ndereya, C. (2015). ‘It’s not my problem’: Exploring lecturers’ distancing behavior towards students with disabilities. Disability & Society, 30, 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weis, R., Dean, E. L., & Osborne, K. J. (2016). Accommodation decision making for postsecondary students with learning disabilities: Individually tailored or one size fits all? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(5), 484–498. doi:10.1177/0022219414559648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tali Heiman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heiman, T., Fichten, C.S., Olenik-Shemesh, D. et al. Access and perceived ICT usability among students with disabilities attending higher education institutions. Educ Inf Technol 22, 2727–2740 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9623-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9623-0

Keywords

Navigation