Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A blended learning course for playfully teaching programming concepts to school teachers

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we report our experiences from a University outreach program with primary and secondary education teachers of various specialties. Our goal was to improve the coding abilities of teachers through Scratch activities. The participants can in turn teach their students, multiplying that way the benefitted population. To increase the participation and the completion percentage, the activities are designed as a course in Moodle realized in discrete runs with manageable groups, in a blended learning approach. The educational material was a combination of learning objects with specific objectives, video material and try-out activities. The course has been completed by 559 teachers from various Greek districts, mainly of regional areas, with a high completion rate of 65%. The participants found the experience highly satisfying, interesting and agreed that they had been supported effectively throughout the process. In the paper we describe the rational of our approach, the design and implementation phases of the project, the outcomes and the main findings of the evaluation of the user opinions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Sabbagh, S., Gedawy, H., Alshikhabobakr, H., and Razak, S. (2017). Computing curriculum in middle schools: An experience report. Proceedings of the 22th ACM annual conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE 2017) 13–16. New York: ACM.

  • Armoni, M. (2017). Computing in schools: On teaching problem-solving paradigms in K-12 education. ACM Inroads, 8(1), 30–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, B., Diaz, T., Gee, M., Justice, R., Kwan, D., Seshadri, P., and Dodds, S. (2016). MyCS at 5: Assessing a middle-years CS curriculum. In Proceedings of 47th technical symposium on computer science education (SIGCSE 2016) 558–563. New York,: ACM.

  • Dee, H., Cufi, X., Milani, A., Marian, M. and Poggioni V. (2017). Playfully coding: Embedding computer science outreach in schools. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE '17) 176–181. New York,: ACM.

  • Eriksson, T., Adawi, T., & Stöhr, C. (2017). Time is the bottleneck: A qualitative study exploring why learners drop out of MOOCs. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 29–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9127-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteves, M., Fonseca, B., Morgado, L., & Martins, P. (2010). Improving teaching and learning of computer programming through the use of the second life virtual world. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 624–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01056.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). What Computational Thinking is. Journal of Information Technology Research, 9(3), v–viii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gkontzis, A. F., Karachristos, C. V., Lazarinis, F., Stavropoulos, E.C., and Verykios, V.S. (2017a) Assessing Student Performance by Learning Analytics Dashboards. In Proc. of ICODL2017, SECTION A: theoretical papers, original research and scientific articles 9(6B):101–115. Greece: Athens.

  • Gkontzis, A.F., Panagiotakopoulos, C. T., Stavropoulos, E. C. and Verykios, V.S. (2017b). A Holistic View on Academic Wide Data through Learning Analytics Dashboards. In Proc. of the online, open and flexible higher education conference 2017 (EADTU annual conference 2017) pp. 12–27.

  • Guo, P.J., Reinecke, K. (2014). Demographic differences in how students navigate through moocs. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on learning@ scale conference (L@S 2014) 21–30. New York: ACM.

  • Ho, A., Chuang, I., Reich, J., Coleman, C., Whitehall, J., Northcutt, C., Williams, J., Hansen, J., Lopez, G., & Peterson, R. (2015). HarvardX and MITx: Two years of open online courses. Cambridge: HarvardX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 133–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamprou, A., Repenning, A., and Escherle, N. (2017). The Solothurn project — Bringing computer science education to primary schools in Switzerland. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE '17) 218–223. New York: ACM.

  • Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 202–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onah, Daniel F. O., Sinclair, J., and Boyatt, R. (2014). Dropout rates of massive open online courses: Behavioural patterns. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on education and new learning technologies, barcelona (EDULEARN14) 5825–5834. Spain.

  • Rodger, S. H., Hayes, J., Lezin, G., Qin, H., Nelson, D., Tucker, R., Lopez, M., Cooper, S., Dann, W., & Slater, D. (2009). Engaging middle school teachers and students with Alice in a diverse set of subjects. SIGCSE Bull., 41(1), 271–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sáez-López, J., Román-González, M., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using 'Scratch' in five schools. Computers & Education, 97, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weintrop, D. and Wilensky, U. (2015). To block or not to block, that is the question: Students’ perceptions of blocks-based programming. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on interaction design and children 199–208. Boston.

  • Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(1), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, S. Rosson, M.B., Shih, P.C., and J.M. Carroll. (2015). Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW’15) 1882–1895. New York: ACM.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Stavros Niarchos Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hellenic Open University, Patras, Greece

    Fotis Lazarinis, Christoforos V. Karachristos, Elias C. Stavropoulos & Vassilios S. Verykios

Authors
  1. Fotis Lazarinis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christoforos V. Karachristos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elias C. Stavropoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vassilios S. Verykios
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fotis Lazarinis.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lazarinis, F., Karachristos, C.V., Stavropoulos, E.C. et al. A blended learning course for playfully teaching programming concepts to school teachers. Educ Inf Technol 24, 1237–1249 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9823-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9823-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation