Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Faculty at Saudi Electronic University attitudes toward using augmented reality in education

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to examine the possibility of implementing the Augmented Reality (AR) application in higher education by answering three questions: Which extended faculty at the Saudi Electronic University are familiar with such applications, what the perceptions do they hold toward using it in education, and what barriers do they believe may hinder implementing this technology. An online survey was designed and distributed to faculty members at two colleges selected randomly to collect data from participants. Even though the faculty were at an accepted level of familiarity with this technology, they did not use it in their classes. Results showed that faculty have a positive attitude toward the use of AR and have confidence in its potential to enrich the learning environment. This result is connected to the AR advantages the faculty were in agreement with. Results also showed that faculty have concerns about some barriers that might impact implementation of AR in the education environment, such as the lack of technical support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akcayir, M., & Akcayir, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkhattabi, M. (2017). Augmented reality as an e-learning tool in primary schools’ education: Barriers to teachers’ adoption. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12(02), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annetta, L., Burton, E. P., Frazier, W., Cheng, R., & Chmiel, M. (2012). Augmented reality games: Using technology on a budget. Science Scope, 36(3), 54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billinghurst, M., & Dunser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressler, D. M., & Bodzin, A. M. (2013). A mixed methods assessment of students’ flow experience during a mobile augmented reality science game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 505–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P., Liu, X., Cheng, W., & Huang, R. (2017). A review of using Augmented Reality in Educationfrom 2011 to 2016. In Innovations in Smart Learning (pp. 13–18). Singapore: Springer.

  • Cheng, K.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, M., & Birt, J. (2018). Pedagogy before technology: A design-based research approach to enhancing skills development in paramedic science using mixed reality. Information, 9(2), 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalim, C. S. C., Kolivand, H., Kadhim, H., Sunar, M. S., & Billinghurst, M. (2017). Factors influencing the acceptance of augmented reality in education: A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Science, 13(11), 581–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortoza, G. (2012). A collaborative augmented campus based on location-aware mobile technology. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 10(1), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., Delacruz, G., & Kumar, M. (2012). Learning physics through play in an augmented reality environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(3), 347–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, E. (2011). Are u feeling appy? Augmented reality, apps and mobile access to local studies information. Australasian Public Libraries and Information Services, 24(3), 125.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Iordache, D. D., & Pribeanu, C. (2009). A comparison of quantitative and qualitative data from a formative usability evaluation of an augmented reality learning scenario. Informatica Economica, 13(3), 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamarainen, A. M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., Browne, A., Mazzuca, D., Tutwiler, M. S., & Dede, C. (2013). EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Computers & Education, 68, 545–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, H. (2003). Collaborative Augmented Reality in education in Proceeding of Imagina 2003 Conference, Monte Carlo, Monaco, 1–4.

  • Morrison, A., Mulloni, A., Lemmela, S., Oulasvirta, A., Jacucci, G., Peltonen, P., Schmalstieg, D., & Regenbrecht, H. (2011). Collaborative use of mobile augmented reality with paper maps. Computers & Graphics, 35(4), 789–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasimah, C. M. Y., Ahmad, A., & Zaman, H. B. (2011). Evaluation of user acceptance of mixed reality technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8), 1369–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltan, F., & Arslan, R. (2016). The use of augmented reality in formal education: A scoping review. Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 503–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serio, A. D., Ibanez, M. B., & Carlos, D. K. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirakaya, M., & Kiliç Çakmak, E. (2018). Investigating student attitudes toward augmented reality. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumadio, D. D., & Rambli, D. R. A. (2010). Preliminary evaluation on user acceptance of the augmented reality use for education. Paper presented at the Computer Engineering and Applications (ICCEA), 2010 Second International Conference on.

  • Wang, X. (2012). Augmented Reality: a new way of augmented learning. eLearn, 2012(10), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wither, J., Tsai, Y., & Azuma, R. (2011). Indirect augmented reality. Computers & Graphics, 35(4), 810–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, R. (2018). Augmented Reality Trends in Education between 2016 and 2017 Years, State of the Art Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Knowhow Nawaz Mohamudally, IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74943. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/state-of-the-art-virtualreality-and-augmented-reality-knowhow/augmented-reality-trends-in-education-between-2016-and-2017-years. Accessed 9 Aug 2018.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamadah Alsadoon.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alsadoon, H., Alhussain, T. Faculty at Saudi Electronic University attitudes toward using augmented reality in education. Educ Inf Technol 24, 1961–1972 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9826-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9826-z

Keywords

Navigation