Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender and student course preferences and course performance in Computer Science departments: A case study

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of gender differences in Computer Science (CS) has captured the attention of many researchers around the world. Over time, research has revealed that negative stereotypes and ‘myths’ about the cognitive skills, academic abilities and interests of females in CS do exist, deterring females from entering the field. Thus, this study aims to shed light on the aforementioned stereotypes and ‘myths’ by investigating gender differences in terms of student preferences and performance in the undergraduate courses included in the entire curriculum of a CS department. For this purpose, a case study was designed, exploiting data from a CS department in Greece; more specifically, 89 graduate degrees were quantitatively analysed. Regarding performance, the analysis of the data revealed that –apart from in a few courses– there are no statistically significant differences between the mean grades of male and female students in most of the curriculum courses of the CS department in question. Concerning student preferences in CS courses, few gender differences appear to exist. At a statistically significant level, males preferred courses related to hardware and software engineering, whereas females selected courses related to theoretical CS, humanities and social sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbiss, J. (2008). Rethinking the ‘problem’ of gender and IT schooling: discourses in literature. Gender and Education, 20(2), 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelman, C. (1991). Women at thirtysomething: Paradoxes of attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Development.

  • Alkhadrawi, A. (2015). Gender Differences in Math and Science Choices and Preferences (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Toledo.

  • Amelink, C. (2009). Literature overview: Gender differences in science achievement. SWE-AWE-CASEE ARP Resources – Gender Differences in Science Performance. Retrieved from http://www.AWEonline.org.

  • Ashcraft, C., Eger, E., & Friend, M. (2012). Girls in IT: The Facts. Boulder: National Center for Women & Information Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, L. J., & Aspray, W. (2006). The state of research on girls and IT. In J. M. Cohoon & W. Aspray (Eds.), Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation (pp. 3–54). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdousis, I., & Kordaki, M. (2016). Computing and STEM in Greek Tertiary education: gender representation of faculty members during the decade 2003–2013. Gender and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1156653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, S. (2014). Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education, 24(2–3), 153–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, S., & Haller, S. (2006). Gender differences and intra-gender differences in Computer Science students: Are female CS majors more similar to male CS majors or female nonmajors? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12, 337–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britner, S. L. (2008). Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physics, and earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 955–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, T. (2012). Computing, we have a problem…. ACM Inroads, 3(4), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (Eds.). (2004). Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049.

  • Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, H., Adams, H., Sanders, B. W., & Larkins, D. B. (2018). Evaluating computer science camp topics in increasing girls' confidence in computer science. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 33(5), 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. (2001). Theorising the machine: gender, education and computing. Gender and Education, 13(3), 307–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge.

  • Cohoon, J. M., & Aspray, W. (Eds.). (2006). Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohoon, J. M., & Cohoon, J. P. (2006). Departmental factors in gendered attrition from undergraduate IT majors (pp. 23–25). NSF’s ITWF & ITR/EWF Principal Investigator Conference.

  • Cohoon, J. P., Cohoon, J. M., & Soffa, M. L. (2013). Educating diverse computing students at the University of Virginia. Computer, 46, 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley, R. J. (2001). Differences in the gender gap: Comparisons across racial/ethnic groups in education and work. (ETS Policy Information Report). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23, 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correll, S. J. (2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69, 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. (2007). Implications of Recent Contributions to Research on K-12 Engineering and Technology Education on STEM Education. Conference Proceedings, 2007 DR-K-12 PI Meeting. Arlington, VA.

  • Cunningham, B., Hoyer, K. M., & Sparks, D. (2015). Gender differences in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) interest, credits earned, and NAEP performance in the 12th grade (NCES 2015-075). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

  • Ding, C. W., Song, K., & Richardson, L. I. (2006). Do mathematical gender differences continue? A longitudinal study of gender differences and excellence in mathematics performance in the U.S. Educational Studies, 40(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131940701301952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In J. S. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate evidence (pp. 199–210). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Barber, B., & Jozefowicz, D. (1999). Linking gender to educational, occupational, and recreational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In W. B. Swann Jr. & J. H. Langlois (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 153–192). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, J. D. (2012). Case study research for business. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M. P. (2002). The influence of laboratory instruction on science achievement and attitude toward science among ninth grade students across gender differences. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(2).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, S. (2007). Perceptions of changing pedagogies in Computing and Information Technology. Gender and IT: Ongoing Challenges for Computing and Information Technology Education in Australian Schools, 125–147.

  • Gannon, S. (2008). ‘Twenty-four seven on the computers’: girls, ICTs and risk. Gender and Education, 20(4), 361–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. J. (2007). Research in psychology: Methods and design (5th ed.). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gürer, D., & Camp, T. (2002). An ACM-W literature review on women in computing. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haussler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2002). An intervention study to enhance girls’ interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 870–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, J., & Freeman, L. A. (2010). Are men more technology-oriented than women? The role of gender on the development of general computer self-efficacy of college students. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21, 203–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: AAUW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., and Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: a metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139.

  • Ilias, A., & Kordaki, M. (2006). Undergraduate studies in computer science and engineering: gender issues. Acm Sigcse Bulletin, 38(2), 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. E. (2005). Twenty-five years of research on gender and ethnic differences in STEM career choices: What have we learned? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 110, 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagacinski, C. M. (2013). Women engineering students: Competence perceptions and achievement goals in the freshman engineering course. Sex Roles, 69(11–12), 644–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiran, D., & Sungur, S. (2012). Middle school students’ science self-efficacy and its sources: examination of gender differences. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(5), 619–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kordaki, M., & Berdousis, I. (2017). Computing and STEM in Greece: Gender representation of students and teachers during the decade 2002/2012. Education and Information Technologies, 22(1), 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, J., Alt, M., & Wu, J. (2009). STEM Coursetaking Among High School Graduates, 1990–2005 (ED-05- CO-0053). Berkeley: MPR Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, G. Y. (2016). Self-efficacy beliefs and their sources in undergraduate computing disciplines: An examination of gender and persistence. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(4), 540–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2003). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Margolis, J., Fisher, A., & Miller, F. (2000). The anatomy of interest: Women in undergraduate computer science. Women's Studies Quarterly, 28, 104–127.

  • Matthews, J. S., Pontiz, C., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Early gender differences in self-regulation and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 689–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M. L. (2013). The chi-square test of independence. Biochemia Medica: Biochemia Medica, 23(2), 143–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L., and Courtney, D. P. (1992). Gender differences in students’ perceptions: Consequences for achievement-related choices. Student Perceptions in the Classroom, 209–228.

  • Mickelson, R. A. (1989). Why does Jane read and write so well? The anomaly of women's achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormrod, J. E. (2007). Educational psychology: Developing learners (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall

  • O'Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). The impact of science knowledge, reading skill, and reading strategy knowledge on more traditional 'high stakes' measures of high school students' science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 161–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J. (2002). Using case studies in research. Management Research News, 25(1), 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sáinz, M., & Eccles, J. (2012). Self-concept of computer and math ability: Gender implications across time and within ICT studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 486–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J., Davis, L., Williams, T., and Williams, J. H. (2004). Gender differences in self-perceptions and academic outcomes: A study of African American high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(1), 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Gaer, E., Pusjens, H., Damme, J., & De Munter, A. (2008). Mathematics participation and Mathematics achievement across secondary school: The role of gender. Sex Roles, 59, 568–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Hong, H., Ravitz, J., & Ivory, M. (2015). Gender differences in factors influencing pursuit of computer science and related fields. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 117–122). ACM.

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Doing case study research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cultural Technology and Communications, University of the Aegean, University Hill, 81100, Mytilene, Greece

    Berdousis Ioannis & Kordaki Maria

Authors
  1. Berdousis Ioannis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kordaki Maria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berdousis Ioannis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ioannis, B., Maria, K. Gender and student course preferences and course performance in Computer Science departments: A case study. Educ Inf Technol 24, 1269–1291 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9828-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9828-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation