Abstract
Access to quality primary education is a major concern in India. Despite of having reasonable infrastructure, issues of teacher absenteeism, poor accountability of teachers, ineffective teaching learning materials and inadequate teaching procedures are still the prevailing causes for poor educational quality in lower tier schools. Though private schools with their high-end infrastructures have tried to establish their domination in imparting quality learning, the latter continue to remain a distant dream for the underprivileged students. Studies have revealed that Internet-enabled, Web 2.0 based blended learning environments can stimulate student engagement, motivation, and learning. However ICT-based supports in Indian schools are provided either mostly to those who can afford it, or as sporadic government experiments which are either discontinued or undervalued. In this context, the paper presents an Internet-enabled blended-learning platform, which combine traditional models of classroom interactions with synchronous e-learning, facilitated by expert online teachers with digital audio-visual contents. The pilot study conducted using proposed blended learning platform proves that it is possible to provide quality education to underprivileged school students. The findings indicate that blended learning platforms in classroom settings, along with quality digital content, expert online teachers and on-site teaching assistants as class coordinator creates a learning environment that can improve learning achievements and well-being of students drastically, irrespective of their socioeconomic status.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Alward, M. (2005) Friendship: An Important Part of Your Child’s Development.www.Googobits.Com
ASER. (2014). ASER 2014: Annual status of education report. New Delhi: ASER Centre. http://img.asercentre.org/docs/Publications/ASER%20Reports/ASER%202014/National%20PPTs/aser2014indiaenglish.pdf.
Atherton, P., & Kingdon, G. (2010). The relative effectiveness and costs of contract and regular teachers in India. Inst. Of education. University of London Available at: http://2010.economicsofeducation.com/user/pdfsesiones/036.pdf.
Bates, A. W., & Poole, G. (2003). Effective teaching with technology in higher education: Foundations for success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Blacksher, E. (2002). On being poor and feeling poor: Low socioeconomic status and the moral self. Theoretical Medicine, 3, 455–470.
Boyd, S., & Barwic, H. (2011). Wellbeing at school: Building a safe and caring school climate that deters bullying. In New Zealand council for educational research https://www.wellbeingatschool.org.nz/about-ws-tools.
British Council Report. (2016). Blended Learning, Skill, Scale at Speed: An Overview of Blended Learning in the UK and India (p. 2016) https://www.britishcouncil.in/sites/default/files/blended_learning_vol_1_6_april.pdf.
Dhawan, A. (2014). India School Education Vision 2030. Central Square Foundation Report. Goa: Paper for India Ideas Conclave 2014 December 2014. http://www.centralsquarefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/India-School-Education-Vision-2030.pdf.
Diamond, A. (2010). The evidence base for improving school outcomes by addressing the whole child and by addressing skills and attitudes, not just content. Early Education and Development, 21(5), 780–793.
Dreze, J. (2003). Patterns of Literacy and Their Social Context. In V. Das et al. (Eds.), The Oxford India Companion of Sociology and Social Anthropology (Vol. 2). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (2013). An uncertain glory: India and its contradictions (Vol. 2013). Princeton University Press.
Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., & Moskal, P. Promising practices in online learning: Blended learning – The convergence of online and face-to-face education. Blended Learning, EDUCAUSE Review, 2004(7).
Fergusson, M. D., Horwood, J. L., & Boden, M. J. (2008). The Transmission of Social Inequality: Examination of the Linkages between Family Socioeconomic Status in Childhood and Educational Achievement in Young Adulthood. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 26, 277–295.
FICCI (2014). Private Sector’s Contribution To K-12 Education in India Current Impact, Challenges and Way Forward, March 2014, http://ficci.in/spdocument/20385/ey-ficci-report-education.pdf
Frisco Report (2013). State of the Schools: Frisco Independent School District 2013–2014. http://www.friscoisd.org/docs/default-source/district-publications/state-of-schools_2013-2014.pdf?sfvrsn=2
Garrison, D. R. (2011, 20 May). E-learning in the 21stcentury: A framework for research and practice. New York: Taylor & Francis. ISBN. isbn:0-203-83876-9.
Giolo, Fele (2012). Why is information system design interested in ethnography? Sketches of an ongoing story. In. G. Viscusi, G. M. Campagnolo and Y. Curzi (eds.), Phenomenology, organizational politics, and IT design: The social study of information systems (pp. 1–30). Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76, 949–967.
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.
IANS (2018). http://www.maeeshat.in/2018/04/absence-of-benchmarks-impacting-quality-of-education-in-government-schools/
ITU (2011). “The Role of ICT in Advancing Growth in Least Developed Countries: Trends, Challenges and Opportunities”, International Telecommunication Union Report, 2011 http://www.itu.int/pub/D-LDC-ICTLDC.2011-2011
Kalolo, J. F. (2018). Digital revolution and its impact on education systems in developing countries. Educ Inf Technol (Online: July 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9778-3.
Kempner, D. E. (1993). The pilot years: The growth of the Nacubo benchmarking project. Nacubo Business Officer, 27(6), 21–31.
Khajehpour, M. (2011). Relationship between emotional intelligence, parental involvement and academic performance of high school students. Procedia Social & Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1081–1086.
Kumar, A. K. S., & Rustagi, P. (2010). Elementary Education in India: Progress, Setbacks, and Challenges. Oxfam India Working Papers Series OIWPS – III.
Lani, James (2010). The Multidimensional Students Life Satisfaction Scale (MSLSS). http://www.statisticssolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/kalins-pdf/singles/the-multidimensional-students-life-satisfaction-scale-mslss.pdf
Laschewski, Lutz. (2011). Innovative E-learning in rural areas: A review. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1861912
Mansell, R. (2010). Power and interests in developing knowledge societies: Exogenous and endogenous discourses in contention. IKM Working Paper No. 11, 2010. p. 7. http://wiki.ikmemergent.net/files/IKM_Working_Paper-11-Robin_Mansell-July2010-final-pdf.pdf
Mayer, D., & Ralph, J. (2008). Key indicators of school quality. In B. V. Brown (Ed.), Key Indicators of Child and Youth Well-Being: Completing the Picture (pp. 279–305). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
MHRD (2017). Draft learning outcomes, MHRD, 2017 http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/Learning_outcomes.pdf
Mukhopadhyay, M. (2001). Total quality Management in Education. New Delhi: NIEPA Publication Unit.
Muralidharan, K., 2014, Building an Inclusive and High-Performing School System, http://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/human-development/building-an-inclusive-and-high-performing-school-system.html
Nandwana, S & Asawa, N. (2011). Manual for Parental Support Scale. National Psychological Corporation, Agra (U.P.) India- 282004.
NPE 1986. The National Policy on Education Department of Education Ministry of Human Resource Development Government of India New Delhi.
Ohara, Y. (2012). Examining the legitimacy of unrecognised low-fee private schools in India: Comparing different perspectives. Compare, 42(1), 69–90.
PERC. (2014). Blended Learning: Defining Models and Examining Conditions to Support Implementation. Philadelphia Education Research Consortium (PERC) September 2014. https://williampennfoundation.org/sites/default/files/reports/Blended-Learning-PERC-Research-Brief-September-2014.pdf.
Sankar, D. (2009). Teachers’ time on task and nature of tasks: Evidence from three Indian states. In Human development department, South Asia region, World Bank. Washington, DC.
Sarangapani, P. (2009). Quality, feasibility and desirability of low-cost private schooling. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(43), 67–69.
Scoffham, S. ,& Jonathan Barness, (2011) Happiness matters: Towards a pedagogy of happiness and well-being. The curriculum journal, Volune 22, issue 4, Taylor and Francis.
Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., & Rossi, M. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56.
Singh, T., Sharma, S., & Nagesh, S. (2017). Socio-economic status scales updated for 2017. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 5, 3264–3267.
Stephens, David (2003). Quality of basic education. Background paper prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2003/4 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/73e7/9e261f5dbcf718d376546ee0fb1d684b4be0.pdf
Student Learning and Wellbeing Framework (2018). , State Of Queensland (Department Of Education) 2018. http://education.qld.gov.au/schools/healthy/docs/student-learning-wellbeing-framework.pdf
Tafani, V. (2003). Language Teaching and Learning Methodology Tirana: SHBLU.
Technopak (2016). Whitepaper on Digital Learning Market in India. Technopak & Simplilearn, August, 2016. http://www.technopak.com/Files/Whitepaper-on-Digital-Learning-Market-in-India.pdf
UNICEF. (2016). Quality of education and child-friendly schooling. http://www.unicef.org/education/bege_61667.html
Vardisio,Roberto and Patricia Chiappini (2015). Digital maturity: What is and how to build it. Proc of the international conference the future of education (5th edition), Florence, Italy 11–12 June 2015. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303683893_Digital_maturity_what_is_and_how_to_build_it
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dey, P., Bandyopadhyay, S. Blended learning to improve quality of primary education among underprivileged school children in India. Educ Inf Technol 24, 1995–2016 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9832-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9832-1