Abstract
Although the negative effects of mobile instant messaging have been stressed, its exponential increment justifies studying its application in education. This paper analyses whether college’ students perception of WhatsApp usefulness influences cognitive processes important for teamwork (i.e., specialization and coordination), specifically for complex decision-making assignments. Additionally, it seeks to clarify to what extent the relationship between perception of WhatsApp usefulness and these cognitive processes could exert some influence on team efficacy, both perceived and objective (grades). For that purpose, a role-play was specifically designed in which WhatsApp played a mayor function as a communication tool. A sample of university students (N = 200) worked in teams to reach decisions. A student in each team was set apart all team members could only communicate through WhatsApp. Findings confirm the relationships between perceived WhatsApp usefulness and specialization and coordination, as well as perceived WhatsApp usefulness and perceived team efficacy. Both the role-play case designed and results obtained are relevant since show that WhatsApp could be applied as a communication tool in team activities, due to the fact that the perception of its usefulness could help to develop positive attitudes towards teamwork (i.e., team perceived efficacy). From an applied perspective WhatsApp could be used for virtual teamwork through, for example, the proposed role-play case shown.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Anderson, B., Fagan, P., Woodnutt, T., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2012). Facebook psychology: Popular questions answered by research. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026452.
Baghaei, N., Mitrovic, A., & Irwin, W. (2007). Supporting collaborative learning and problem-solving in a constraint-based CSCL environment for UML class diagrams. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 159–190.
Cabero Almenara, J., & Marín Díaz, V. (2013). Percepciones de los estudiantes universitarios latinoamericanos sobre las redes sociales y el trabajo en grupo. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 10(2), 219–233.
Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017). Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 105, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003.
Chou, H. W., Lin, Y. H., & Chou, S. B. (2012). Team cognition, collective efficacy, and performance in strategic decision-making teams. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40(3), 381–394.
Chuah, S. H.-W., Rauschnabel, P. A., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., & Lade, S. (2016). Wearable technologies: The role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 276–284.
Contractor, N. S., Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2006). Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 681–703.
DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32–53.
Denker, K. J., Manning, J., Heuett, K. B., & Summers, M. E. (2018). Twitter in the classroom: Modeling online communication attitudes and student motivations to connect. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 1–8.
Elhay, A. A., & Hershkovitz, A. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of out-of-class communication, teacher-student relationship, and classroom environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9782-7.
Engeström, Y. (2009). Wildfire activities: New patterns of mobility and learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, I, 2, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4018/jmbl.2009040101.
Esteve, F., & Gisbert, M. (2011). El Nuevo paradigma de aprendizaje y nuevas tecnologías. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 9(3), 55–73.
Gao, Q., Yan, Z., Zhao, C., Pan, Y., & Mo, L. (2014). To ban or not to ban: Differences in mobile phone policies at elementary, middle, and high schools. Computers in Human Behaviour, 38, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.011.
Gao, Q., Yan, Z., Wei, C., Liang, Y., & Mo, L. (2017). Three different roles, five different aspects: Differences and similarities in viewing school mobile phone policies among teachers, parents, and students. Computers and Education, 106, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.007.
García González, J. L., & García Ruíz, R. (2012). Aprender entre iguales con herramientas Web 2.0 y Twitter en la Universidad. Análisis de un caso. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 40, 1–14.
Gewerc, A., Montero, L., & Lama, M. (2014). Collaboration and social networking in higher education. Comunicar, 21(42), 55–62.
Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Young, N. C. J., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 Opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337.
Gutiérrez-Porlán, I., & Román-García, M. (2018). Strategies for the communication and collaborative online work by university students. Comunicar, 26(54), 91–99.
Hawi, N. S., & Samaha, M. (2016). To excel or not to excel: Strong evidence on the adverse effect of smartphone addiction on academic performance. Computers and Education, 98, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.007.
Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., & Nguyebm, J. (2017). Impact of mobile technology on students attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers and Education, 107, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.006.
Holtgraves, T. (2011). Text messaging, personality, and the social context. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 92–99.
Hong, F. Y., Chiu, S. I., & Huang, D. H. (2012). A model of the relationship between psychological characteristics, mobile phone addiction and use of mobile phones by Taiwanese university female students. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2152–2159.
Huang, H. Y. (2016). Examining the beneficial effects of individual's self-disclosure on the social network site. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 122–132.
Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Research trend in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journal from 2001-2010. British Journal of Education Technology, 42(4), E65–E70.
Jahnke, I., Bergström, P., Märell-Olsson, E., Häll, L., & Kumar, S. (2017). Digital didactical designs as research framework: iPad integration in Nordic schools. Computers & Education, 113, 1–15.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2008). Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks. Organization Science, 19(2), 260–276.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 785–812). London: MacMillan.
Kanawattanchai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 783–808.
Kienle, A. (2009). Intertwining synchronous and asynchronous communication to support collaborative learning—System design and evaluation. Education and Information Technologies, 14(1), 55–79.
Kim, H., Lee, M. Y., & Kim, M. (2014). Effects of Mobile instant messaging on collaborative learning processes and outcomes: The case of South Korea. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 31–42.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computersupported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behaviour, 19(3), 335–353.
Lancaster, S., Yen, D. C., Huang, A. H., & Hung, S. Y. (2007). The selection of instant messaging or e-mail: College students' perspective for computer communication. Information Management & Computer Security, 15(1), 5–22.
Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587–604.
Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. L. (2012). Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 342–365.
Middelweerd, A., van der Laan, D. M., van Stralen, M. M., Mollee, J. S., Stuij, M., TeVelde, S. J., & Brug, J. (2015). What features do Dutch university students prefer in a smartphone application for promotion of physical activity? A qualitative approach. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1).
Motiwalla, L. F. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education, 49(3), 581–596.
Myers, K. K., & Sadaghiani, K. (2010). Millennials in the workplace: A communication perspective on millennials’ organizational relationships and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 225–238.
Neville, C. C., Petro, R., Mitchell, G. K., & Brady, S. (2013). Team decision making: Design, implementation and evaluation of an interprofessional education activity for undergraduate health science students. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(6), 523–525.
Ogara, S. O., Koh, C. E., & Prybutok, V. R. (2014). Investigating factors affecting social presence and user satisfaction with mobile instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 453–459.
Olson, B. J., Parayitam, S., & Bao, Y. (2007). Strategic decision making: The effects of cognitive diversity, conflict, and trust on decision outcomes. Journal of Management, 33(2), 196–222.
Ortega, S. y Gacitúa, J.C. (2008). Espacios interactivos de comunicación y aprendizaje. La construcción de identidades. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC), 5(2), 17–25.
Pea, R. D. (1994). Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 219–225.
Peltokorpi, V. (2008). Transactive memory systems. Review of General Psychology, 12(4), 378–394.
Pierce, T. (2009). Social anxiety and technology: Face-to-face communication versus technological communication among teens. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1367–1372.
Pimmer, C., Brühlmann, F., Odetola, T. D., Oluwasola, D. O., Dipeolu, O., & Ajuwon, A. J. (2019). Facilitating professional mobile learning communities with instant messaging. Computers & Education, 128, 102–112.
Prayitam, S., & Dooley, R. S. (2009). The interplay between cognitive and affective conflict and congnition- and affect-based trust in influencing decision outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 62, 789–796.
Purvanova, R. K. (2014). Face-to-face versus virtual teams: What have we really learned? The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 17(1), 2–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000009.
Rambe, P., & Bere, A. (2013). Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a south African University of technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 544–561.
Ren, Y., & Argote, L. (2011). Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 189–229.
Rico, R., Hinsz, V. B., Burke, S., & Salas, E. (2017). A multilevel model of multiteam motivation and performance. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(3), 197–226.
Rubio-Romero, J., & Perlado, M. (2015). El fenómeno WhatsApp en el contexto de la comunicación personal: una aproximación a través de los jóvenes universitarios. Icono, 14(13), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v13i2.818.
Ryu, H., & Parsons, D. (2012). Risky business or sharing the load?–social flow in collaborative mobile learning. Computers & Education, 58(2), 707–720.
Salehan, M., & Negahban, A. (2013). Social networking on smartphones: When mobile phones become addictive. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2632–2639.
Santos, I. M., Bocheco, O., & Habak, C. (2018). A survey of student and instructor perceptions of personal mobile technology usage and policies for the classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 617–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9625-y.
Sevillano-García, M. L., González-Flores, M. P., Vázquez-Cano, E., & Rey Yedra, L. (2016). Ubicuidad y movilidad de herramientas virtuales abren nuevas expectativas formativas para el estudiantado universitario. Revista Ensayos Pedagógicos, V. XI(2), 99–131.
Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Statista (2018). Global social networks. Education and Information Technologies, Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/ (consulted on January 2019).
Sultan, N. (2014). Making use of cloud computing for healthcare provision: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Information Management, 34(2), 177–184.
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275.
Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2017). Is mobile instant messaging (MIM) useful in education? Examining its technological, pedagogical, and social affordances. Educational Research Review, 21, 85–104.
Urbina, S. & Salinas, J. (2014). Campus virtuales: Una perspectiva evolutiva y tendencias. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 42. http://www.um.es/ead/red/42. Accessed Sep 2018.
Vista, A., Awwal, N., & Care, E. (2016). Sequential actions as markers of behavioural and cognitive processes: Extracting empirical pathways from data streams of complex tasks. Computers & Education, 92–93, 15–36.
Voyiatzaki, E., & Avouris, N. (2014). Support for the teacher in technology-enhanced collaborative classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 129–154.
Wegner, D. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen y G. R. Goethals (Eds.). Theories of group behaviour (pp. 185–208). Nueva York: Springer-Verlag.
Yoon, C., Jeong, C., & Rolland, E. (2015). Understanding individual adoption of mobile instant messaging: A multiple perspectives approach. Information Technology and Management, 16(2), 139–151.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Urien, B., Erro-Garcés, A. & Osca, A. WhatsApp usefulness as a communication tool in an educational context. Educ Inf Technol 24, 2585–2602 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09876-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09876-5
Keywords
- Mobile communication
- Collective memory
- Complex thinking
- Third sector
- Communicative processes
- Solving problems
- Teamwork