Abstract
This study aims to predict the academic achievements of Turkish and Malaysian vocational and technical high school (VTS) students in science courses (physics, chemistry and biology) through artificial neural networks (ANN) and to put forth the measures to be taken against their failure. The study population consisted of 10th and 11th grade 922 VTS students in Turkey and 1050 VTS students in Malaysia. The study was conducted with the screening model, and a 34-item demographic questionnaire was developed for the collection of data Using the SPSS 24.0, the KR20 reliability coefficient of the questionnaire was found to be .90. The items in the questionnaire that were believed to affect academic achievement were accepted as independent variable/input, and the academic achievement averages of students in the previous year’s physics, chemistry and biology courses were considered as dependent variables/output. Using these parameters, a model was created and the academic achievements of the students were predicted with ANN using the Matlab R2016a program. At the end of the study, a successful academic achievement prediction system was developed with an average 98.0% sensitivity over 922 samples for Turkey and with a 95.7% sensitivity over 1050 samples for Malaysia, and the measures to be taken were determined in order the prevent failure of students.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alomar, B. O. (2006). Personal and family paths to pupil achievement. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(8), 907–922.
Altun, S. A., & Çakan, M. (2008). Factors affecting student success on exams: The case of sucessful cities on LGS/OSS exams. Elementary Education Online, 7(1), 157–173.
Anıl, D. (2009). Factors effecting science achievement of science students in programme for international students’ achievement (PISA) in Turkey. Education and Science, 34(152), 87–100.
Aryadoust, V., & Baghaei, P. (2016). Does EFL readers' lexical and grammatical knowledge predict their reading ability? Insights from a perceptron artificial neural network study. Educational Assessment, 21(2), 135–156.
Aycan, Z., & Balcı, H. (2001). Individual-and organizational-level predictors of training effectiveness in business organizations. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 16(48), 13–31.
Aydoğdu, İ. (2017). Estimation of student successes by artificial Neural Networks and comparison of efficacy of impact models by logistic regression analysis. (Unpublished master dissertation).,YüzüncüYıl University, Van, Turkey.
Bahadır, E. (2013). Prediction of student teachers' academic success with logistic regression analysis and artificial neural networks methods. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Bahadır, E. (2016). Using neural network and logistic regression analys to predict prospective mathematics teachers’ academic success upon entering graduate education. Educatıonal Scıences: Theory & Practıce, 16(3), 643–964.
Baş, N. (2006). Artificial neural networks approach and an application] (unpublished master dissertation. Mimar Sinan GüzelSanatlar University İstanbul, Turkey.
Binici, H., & Arı, N. (2004). Seeking new perspectives in technical and vocational education. Gazi University Education Faculty Journal, 24(3), 383–396.
Briggs, D. C., & Circi, R. (2017). Challenges to the use of artificial neural networks for diagnostic classifications with student test data. International Journal of Testing, 17(4), 302–321.
Çavdur, F., Değirmen, S., & Küçük, M. K. (2018). A clustering and goal programming-based approach for homogeneous exam distribution in exam scheduling problems. Uludağ University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering, 23(1), 167–188.
Çevik, M. (2014). The evaluation of the Current Biology currucilum according to teachers’ and students’ opinions who are studying at vocational and technical high school and a new draft proposal: the example of photosynthesis subject. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ankara, Turkey: Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences.
Christman, E., & Badgett, J. (1999). A comparative analysis of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on student achievement in differing science and demographic areas. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18, 135–143.
Çiftçi, C., & Çağlar, A. (2014). The effect of socio-economic characteristics of parents on student achievement: Ispoverty destiny? International Journal of Human Sciences, 11(2), 155–175.
Çırak, G., & Çokluk, Ö. (2013). The usage of artifical neural network and logistic regresssion methods in the classification of student achievement in higher education. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 3(2), 71–79.
Dee, T. S. (2007). Teachers and the gender gaps in student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 42(3), 528–554.
Education System in Malaysia (ESM). (2019). retrived from https://www.scholaro.com/pro/Countries/Malaysia/Grading-System on 05.02.2019.
Eker, G. (2007). The burnout level students of occupational high school. (Unpublished master dissertation). İstanbul, Turkey: Marmara University.
Erbaş, K. C. (2005). Factors affecting scientific literacy of students in Turkey in programme for international student assessment (PISA). (Unpublished master dissertation). Ankara, Turkey: Middle East University.
Erdoğdu, M. Y. (2006). Relationships between creativity, teacher behaviours and academic success. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(17), 95–106.
Ereş, F., & BıçakKoçak, D. (2017). Increasing and hindering factors of student achievement in middle schools. ASOS Journal., 5(51), 32–45.
Erol, N. (2010). The determining the educational needs of teachers in accordance with new curriculum in vocational high education. (Unpublished master dissertation). Ankara, Turkey: Gazi University.
Freedman, M. P. (1997). Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 343–357.
Fuchs, T., & Woessmann, L. (2005). Computers and student learning: bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availability and use of computers at home and at school. (CES) Ifo Working Paper Series No.8). Retrieved from http://www.cesifo-group.de/DocDL/IfoWorkingPaper-8.pdf.
Gorr, W. L., Nagin, D., & Szczypula, J. (1994). Comparative study of artificial neural network and statistical models for predicting student grade point averages. Interntional Journal of Forecasting, 10, 17–34.
Han, J. Pei, J., & Kamber, M. (2011). Data mining, Southeast Asia edition: concepts and techniques. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Holmes, M., Latham, A., Crockett, K., & O'Shea, J. D. (2018). Near real-time comprehension classification with artificial neural networks: Decoding e-learner non-verbal behavior. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(1), 5–12.
Ibrahim, Z., & Rusli, D. (2007). Predicting students’ academic performance: comparıng artificial neural network, decision tree and linear regression. 21st Annual SAS Malaysia Forum, Shangri- La Hotel, Kuala Lumpur, September, 5.
Jackson, J. K., & Ash, G. (2012). Science achievement for all: Improving science performance and closing achievement gaps. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 723–744.
Johnson, C. C., Kahle, J. B., & Fargo, J. D. (2007). A study of the effect of sustained, whole-school professional development on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 775–786.
Karasar, N. (2005). Scientific research method. Ankara: Nobel YayınDağıtım.
Kaya, S., & Rice, D. C. (2010). Multilevel effects of student and classroom factors on elementary science achievement in five countries. International Journal of Science Education, 32(10), 1337–1363.
Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. The Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273.
Konstantopoulos, S. (2006). Trends of school effects on student achievement: Evidence. Teachers College Record, 108(12), 2550–2581.
Memduhoğlu, H. B., & Tanhan, F. (2013). Study of organisational factors scale’s validity and reliability affecting university students’ academic achievements. YüzüncüYıl University Journal Of Education Faculty, 10(1), 106–124.
Ministry of National Education (MoNE), (2016). Ministry of National Education Regulation of Secondary Education Institutions. Ankara, Ministry of National Education Publish. retrived from http://ogm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2016_11/03111224_ooky.pdf on 04.02.2019.
MoNE, (2005). Mathematics and vocational mathematics curriculum. Ministry of National Education General Directorate of Apprenticeship and Non-formal Education, Ankara.
Oladokun, V. O., Adebanjo, A. T., & Charles-Owaba, O. E. (2008). Predicting students’ academic performance using artificial neural network: A case study of an engineering course. The Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 9(1), 72–79.
Ong, L. C., Chandran, V., Lim, Y. Y., Chen, A. H., & Poh, B. K. (2010). Factors associated with poor academic achievement among urban primary school children in Malaysia. Singapore Medical Journal, 51(3), 247–252.
ÖSYM, (2016). Undergraduate placement examinations (2016-Lys) Results. Retrieved from http://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2016/LYS/LYSSayisalBilgiler19072016.pdf
Özer, Y., & Anıl, D. (2011). Examining the factors affecting students' science and mathematics achievement with structural equation modeling. Hacettepe University Journal Of Education Faculty, 41, 313–324.
Öztemel, E. (2003). Artificial Neural Networks (First Edition). İstanbul: Papatya Publishing.
Sabancı, K. (2013). Determination of variable-level herbicide application parameters by artificial neural networks for weed control in sugar beet cultivation. Ph.D. Thesis, Selcuk University, Institute of Science and Technology, Konya.
Şahin, İ., & Fındık, T. (2008). Vocational and technical education in Turkey: Current situation, problems and proposition solutions. TSA, 12(3), 65–86.
Saşmazer, G. A. (2006). Factors that affecting success of scientific literacy on students in Turkey that participate programme for international student assessment (PISA). (Unpublished master dissertation). Ankara: Hacettepe University.
Subbanarasimha, P. N., Arinzeb, B., & Anandarajanb, M. (2000). The predictive accuracy of artificial neural networks and multiple regression in the case of skewed data. Exploration of some issues. Expert Systems with Applications, 19, 117–123.
Taningco, M. T. V., & Pachon, H. P. (2008). Computer use, parental expectations, and latino academic achievement. USA: Tomas Rivera Policy Institute.
Tosun, Ö. (2007). Artificial neural networks decision tree comparison in classification analysis: An application on students success. (unpublished master dissertation). İstanbul, Turkey: İstanbul Technical University.
VeeraManickam, M. R. M., Mohanapriya, M., Pandey, B. K., Akhade, S., Kale, S. A., Patil, R., & Vigneshwar, M. (2018). Map-reduce framework based cluster architecture for academic student’s performance prediction using cumulative dragonfly based neural network. Cluster Computing, 1–17.
Yenice, N., Saydam, G., & Telli, S. (2013). Determining factors effecting on primary school students’ motivation towards science learning. Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Education Faculty Journal (KEFAD), 13(2), 231–247.
Yörük, S., Dikici, A., & Uysal, A. (2002). The informati on of community and vocational education in Turkey. Fırat University Journal of Social Science, 24(3), 229–312.
Yurtoğlu, H. (2005). Artificial neural networks and predictive modeling methodology: in Turkey for some macroeconomic variables. (Published master dissertation). Ankara: State Planning Organization.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yağci, A., Çevik, M. Prediction of academic achievements of vocational and technical high school (VTS) students in science courses through artificial neural networks (comparison of Turkey and Malaysia). Educ Inf Technol 24, 2741–2761 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09885-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09885-4