Abstract
Learning analytics is an emerging field in which educators and researchers are using data to improve their students’ educational experiences. One of the most common courses offered by higher academic institutions in the US is data science. This paper examines the data science syllabi found in today’s academic sector and compares the results to those of Friedman’s, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(5), 135–148 (2017) study of Big Data syllabi. For the present study, 40 data science syllabi used in private and public academic institutions in the US were collected, and Palmer et al.’s, To Improve the Academy, 33, 14–36 (2014) rubric was used as a framework to analyze them. The study found that the most frequently used communication engagement tool, according to the syllabi, was discussion forums (used in 53% of the syllabi), and instant message applications were second (21%). Using Palmer et al.’s rubric, the study found 95% of all data science syllabi the study examined provided very detailed articulation and scored in the top range outline by the model. In comparing data science syllabi to big data syllabi, the study found that data science syllabi provided better descriptions of the learning goals than did big data syllabi. Future studies could examine students’ participation and appreciation of these courses using a machine analytics rubric.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Aha, D. W., Kibler, D., & Albert, M. K. (1991). Instance-based learning algorithms. In Machine learning, 6(1), 37–66 (Vol. 6, pp. 37–66). Heidelberg: Berlin.
Ambrose, S.A., Bridges, M.W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M.C. and Norman, M.K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
Anderson, P., Bowring, J., McCauley, R., Pothering, G., & Starr, C. (2014, March). An undergraduate degree in data science: Curriculum and a decade of implementation experience. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 145–150). ACM.
Banihashem, S. K., Aliabadi, K., Ardakani, S. P., Delaver, A., & Ahmadabadi, M. N. (2018). Learning analytics: A critical literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences (In press), 9.
Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165–1188.
Demšar, J., Zupan, B., Leban, G., & Curk, T. (2004, September). Orange: From experimental machine learning to interactive data mining. In European conference on principles of data mining and knowledge discovery (pp. 537–539). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Dhar, V. (2013). Data science and prediction. Communications of the ACM, 56(12), 64–73.
Diggle, P. J. (2015). Statistics: A data science for the 21st century. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 178(4), 793–813.
Eberly, M. B., Newton, S. E., & Wiggins, R. A. (2001). The syllabus as a tool for student-centered learning. The Journal of General Education, 50, 56–74.
Fayyad, U. M., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Smyth, P. (1996, August). Knowledge discovery and data mining: Towards a unifying framework. In KDD (Vol. 96, pp. 82–88).
Fiaidhi, J. (2014). The next step for learning analytics. IT Professional, 16(5), 4–8.
Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Fornaciari, C. J., & Lund Dean, K. (2003). The 21st-century syllabus: From pedagogy to andragogy. Journal of Management Education, 38(5), 701–723.
Friedman, A. (2017). Measuring the promise of big data syllabi. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(5), 135–148.
Grinstein, U. M. F. G. G., & Wierse, A. (2002). Information visualization in data mining and knowledge discovery. Morgan Kaufmann.
Gross Davis, B. (1993). Tools for teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hardin, J., Hoerl, R., Horton, N. J., Nolan, D., Baumer, B., Hall-Holt, O., Murrell, P., Peng, R., Roback, P., Temple Lang, D., & Ward, M. D. (2015). Data science in statistics curricula: Preparing students to “think with data.”. The American Statistician, 69(4), 343–353.
Howe, B., Franklin, M., Haas, L., Kraska, T., & Ullman, J. (2017, April). Data science education: We're missing the boat, again. In 2017 IEEE 33rd international conference on data engineering (ICDE) (pp. 1473–1474). IEEE.
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning (Vol. 112). New York: Springer.
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255–260.
Konkol'ová, V., & Paralič, J. (2018, November). Active learning in data science education. In 2018 16th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA) (pp. 285–290). IEEE.
Kuhlmann, C. B. (1917). Minnesota History Teachers' Syllabus. The Social Studies, 8(5), 147.
Leek, J. (2013). Six types of analyses every data science should know [blog post]. Retrieved July 11, 2018.
Long, P., & Siemens, G. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review Online, 46(5), 31–40.
McKeachie, W. J. (1999). Peer learning, collaborative learning, cooperative learning. In Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (pp. 158–166).
McKeachie, W. J., Lin, Y. G., & Mendelson, C. N. (1978). A small study assessing teacher effectiveness: Does learning last? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, 352–357.
Mitchell, T. M. (1999). Machine learning and data mining. Communications of the ACM, 42(11).
Napoli, P. M., & Karaganis, J. (2010). On making public policy with publicly available data: The case of US communications policymaking. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 384–391
O'Neil, C., & Schutt, R. (2013). Doing data science: Straight talk from the frontline. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
Palmer, M. S., Bach, D. J., & Streifer, A. C. (2014). Measuring the promise: A learning-focused syllabus rubric. To Improve the Academy, 33, 14–36.
Picciano, A. G. (2012). The evaluation of big data and learning analytics in American higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(3), 9–20.
Richlin, L. (2006). Blueprint for learning: Construction college courses to facilitate, assess, and document learning. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. Cognition and Second Language Instruction, 288.
Saltz, J. S., & Stanton, J. M. (2017). An introduction to data science. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Van Barneveld, A., Arnold, K.E., & Campbell, J.P. (2012). Analytics in higher education: Establishing a common language. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, 1(1), l-ll.
White, R. V. (1988). The ELT curriculum: Design, innovation and management. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wu, C. F. J. (1997). Statistics = data science. Retrieved July 11, 2018.
Wu, X., Kumar, V., Quinlan, J. R., Ghosh, J., Yang, Q., Motoda, H., et al. (2008). Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowledge and Information Systems, 14(1), 1–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friedman, A. Data science syllabi measuring its content. Educ Inf Technol 24, 3467–3481 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09935-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09935-x