Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Electronic portfolio development and narrative reflections in higher education: Part and parcel of the culture?

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effective use of the electronic portfolios in the educational context of graduate students in a major research university in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The use of electronic portfolios with university students has many benefits including advancing learning, assessment and evaluation. The electronic portfolio is considered an innovative instructional approach that has not widely been used in the UAE. Forty electronic portfolios were included in the careful analysis of the e-portfolio development, rubric and reflective narratives. Description of best methods on how to develop the e-portfolio in university teaching and learning, along with areas of attainment is presented. A major result indicates a high reliability of the e-portfolio rubric (0.77) with UAE graduate students. Another result indicated that university student effective use of electronic portfolios leads to successful learning and reflective experiences. A key recommendation is that instructors and institutions can effectively utilize e-portfolios to improve learning and assessment, course delivery, and program outcomes. In addition, personalizing learning indicated by several authentic narrative reflections can be another implication of the e-portfolio use at the higher education level to improve self or online learning and project-based learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Arcario, P., Eynon, B., Klages, M., & Polnariev, B. (2013). Closing the loop: How we better serve our students through a comprehensive assessment process. Metropolitan Universities Journal., 24(2), 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  • Bhattacharya, M. (2001) .Electronic portfolios, student reflective practices, and the evaluation of effective learning. AARE Conference, Fremantle, Australia, 2–6.

  • Barrett, H. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy., 50(6), 436–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briceland, L., Pharm, D., & Hamilton, R. (2010). Electronic reflective student portfolios to demonstrate achievement of ability-based outcomes during advanced pharmacypractice experiences Albanyuniversity of pharmacy and health sciences. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education., 74, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge, D. (2008). Versities as responsive learning organizations through competency-based assessment with electronic portfolios. The Journal of General Education., 57(1), 52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D., Melenyzer, B., Nettles, D., & Wyman, R. (2000). Portfolio and performance assessment in teacher education. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. H., & Lee, G. (2010). A major e-learning project to renovate science learning environment in Taiwan. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology., 9(1), 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, H. (2010). Weblog-based electronic portfolios of student teachers in Taiwan. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58(2), 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • City University of New York (2010). First round working committee reports. Retrieved on November 2016 from http://guttman.cuny.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2014/08/NCCCompiledCommitteeReportFinal.pdf Using Digital Portfolios: Reflection, Assessment & Employment.

  • Cleveland, R. (2018). Linking research and practice to improve learning. Association for Educational Communications & Technology., 62(3), 276–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshmukh, V., Forawi, S., & Jaiswal, A. (2012). (2012). The role of e-learning in science education Vis-a-Vis teacher training Institutes in Middle East. US-China Education Review., 2(2), 142–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forawi, S., & Liang, X. (2005). Science electronic portfolios: Developing and validating the scoring rubric. Journal of Science Education., 2(6), 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forawi, S., & Wonderwell, S. (2003). Examining electronic portfolio reflective narratives. Proceedings of Society of Information Technology and Teacher Education. Albuquerque, New Mexico., 3, 2101–2117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forawi, S., Almekhlafi, G., & Al-Mekhlafy, M. (2012). Development and validation of pre-service teachers’ electronic portfolios in the UAE. US-China Education Review., 2(1), 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forawi, S.A., & Mitchell, R.M. (2012). Pre-Service teachers’ assessment of critical thinking attributes of the Ohio and New York States’ science and math content standards. American Canadian Conference for Academic Disciplines. Ryerson University. Toronto, pp. 21–24.

  • Gambino, L. (2014). Putting e-portfolios at the center of our learning. Peer Review., 16, 1): 1–1): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garis, W. (2007) e‐Portfolios: Concepts, designs, and integration within student affairs. New Directions for Student Services 2007(119, :3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaze, A. (2018). Teaching and learning science in the 21st century: Challenging critical assumptions in post-secondary science. Education Sciences., 8(12), 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, A., & Cherrington, S. (2017). What’s the story? Exploring parent–teacher communication through e-portfolios. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood., 42(4), 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, T., Sanford, K., Hong, F., & Monk, D. (2016). Electronic portfolio development in three professional programs: Conceptual framework and summary of initial findings. Journal of Technologies & Human Usability., 12(2), 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, D., Pickavance, J., & Hyberger, A. (2015). Reflective e-portfolios: One HIP to rule them all? Peer Review, 15–18.

  • Jenson, P., & Treuer, J (2014) Defining the E-Portfolio: What it is and why it mattersnChange: The magazine of higher learning. Volume 46, Number 2, ISSN 0009-1383.

  • Lallmamode, S., Mat Daud, N., & Abu Kassim, N. (2016). Development and initial argument-based validation of a scoring rubric used in the assessment of L2 writing electronic portfolios. Assessing Writing., 30, 44–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, G. & Cox, R. (2001) A critical matrix of learning and teaching. Electronic Book Chapter | Chapter 4, pp 44–65. IN: Light, G. & Cox, R. – Learning and teaching in higher education: the reflective professional. Retrived on May 2018 from http://lists.lib.mmu.ac.uk/items/3487B6CC-EF14-C901-F7A8-1635326D91AD.html.

  • Lin, P., Yang, L., & Lai, Y. ( 2013). Exploring synergistic DVFS control of cores and DRAMs for thermal efficiency in CMPs with 3D-stacked DRAMs, in Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (ISLPED ‘13) WIP. Beijing, China.

  • Lorenzo G, Ittelson J. (2005) An overview of E-portfolios. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. Retrieved May 2018, from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3001.pdf

  • Macduff, I. (2009). Using blogs as a teaching tool in negotiation. Negotiation Journal., 25(1), 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeus, W., Questier, F., & Derks, T. (2006). Open source e-portfolio: Development and implementation of aninstitution-wide electronic portfolio platform for students. Educational Media International, 43(2), 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theaory. 3rdEdition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Laughlin, N., & Serra, S. (2016). Using eportfolios to deepen civic engagement. Peer Review., 18(3), 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J., Kleve, S., & Palermo, C. (2016). An exploratory study comparing two electronic portfolio approaches in undergraduate dietetic education. Nutrition & Dietetics., 73(3), 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. NewYork: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1998). Teacher portfolios: A theoretical activity. In N. Lyons (Ed.), With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism (Vol. 1003, pp. 23–37). New York: Teachersuniversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strudler N, Wetzel K. Electronic portfolios in teacher education: Forging a middle ground. 2011; 44(2): 161–173.

  • Takayama, K. (2014). A metacognitive approach to mapping collaborative inquiry through e-portfolios. Peer Review., 16, 1): 1–1): 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • TIMSS (2011). International results in mathematics international association for the evaluation of educational achievement (IEA). Publisher: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.

  • Trammell, K., & Keshelashvili, A. (2005). Examining the new influencers: A self-presentation study ofA-list blogs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly., 82(4), 968–982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yancey, K.B. (2001). General patterns and the future. In B. L. Cambridge, S. Kahn, D. P. Tompkins & K. B. Yancey (Eds.), Electronic portfolios: Emerging practices in student, faculty, and institutional learning, (pp. 83–87). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

  • Yancey, H. (2009). Electronic portfolios a decade into the twenty-first century: What we know, what we need to know. Peer Review., 28–32.

  • Zawacki-Richter, O., Hanft, A., & Bäcker, E. (2011). Validation of competencies in e-portfolios: A qualitative analysis. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning., 12(1), 42–60.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Ahmed, M. (2018). Reflection for the undergraduate on writing in the portfolio: Where are we now and where are we going? Journal Advanced Med Education Prof., 6(3), 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alotaibi, F. S. (2012). Implementing portfolio in postgraduate general practice training. Benefits and recommendations. Saudi Med Journal, 33(10), 1053–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, H. (2003). (2003). Electronic teacher portfolios. Proceedings of Society of Information Technology and Teacher Education., 2, 120–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colás-Bravo, P., Magnoler, P., & Conde-Jiménez, J. (2018). Identification of levels of sustainable consciousness of teachers in training through an E-portfolio. Sustainability, 10, 3700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, V., Kaye, V., & Osborne, A. (2015). Implementing an e-portfolio for non-medical prescribing modules. Nurse prescribing, 13(5), 250–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forawi, S., & Balfakih, N. (2009). Effective use of handheld technologies with in-service science teachers and students in the UAE. The International Journal of the Humanities, 7(7), 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuglík, V. and Tocháček, D. Using an electronic portfolio to support the learning process of lower-secondary school pupils when choosing a career 2019; 16 (1):5–25.

  • Gadbury-Amyot, C. C., Godley, L. W., & Nelson, J. W. (2019). Measuring the level of reflective ability of Predoctoral dental students: Early outcomes in an e-portfolio reflection. Journal of Dental Education., 83(3), 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habeeb, K., & Ebrahim, H. (2019). Impact of e-portfolios on teacher assessment and student performance on learning science concepts in kindergarten. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1661–1679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, D. (2016). Eportfolios, assessment, and general education transformation. Peer Review., 18(3), 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irving, K., & Bell, R. (2004). Double visions: Educational technology in standards and assessments for science and mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology., 13(2), 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • lepcevic-Zach, P., & Stock, M. (2018). Portfolio as a tool for reflection and self-reflection. Reflective Practice, 19(3), 291–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell, C. (2007). Teaching portfolio practice in Ireland: A handbook. Dublin: Higher Education Authority of Ireland https://www.tcd.ie/CAPSL/assets/pdf/Teaching_Portfolio_Practice_in_Ireland.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, A., & Burghart, G. (2015). E-portfolio for radiologic technology students. Radiologic Technology, 87, 2). 227–2). 229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, N., Lau, H., & Lai, W. (2010). Sharing e-learning innovation across disciplines: An encounter between engineering and teacher education. Electronic Journal of e-Learning., 8(1), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. (2018). Which resources are most helpful to support development of an eportfolio? British Journal of Nursing, 27(5), 266–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodosiadou, D., & Konstantinidis, A. (2015). Introducing e-portfolio use to primary school pupils: Response, benefits and challenges. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 14, 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zundel, S., Blumenstock, G., Zipfel, S., Herrmann-Werner, A., & Holderried, F. (2015). Portfolios enhance clinical activity in surgical clerks. Journal of Surgical Education., 72(5), 927–935.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of e-Education, Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    Khadeegha Alzouebi

Authors
  1. Khadeegha Alzouebi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khadeegha Alzouebi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alzouebi, K. Electronic portfolio development and narrative reflections in higher education: Part and parcel of the culture?. Educ Inf Technol 25, 997–1011 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09992-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09992-2

Keywords