Abstract
The development of ICT has led to the use of simulation and visualisation (S&V) in various domains as a useful virtual interactive tool. Although there are many discussions and related studies on the relevancy of S&V in current applications, the tools and methods proposed do not sufficiently meet the needs of the different and dynamic users today. A literature study has identified five main components that may influence the STEM motivation among school children through the integration of S&V that are: a) Simulation and Visualisation for CAI; b) Motivation Level and Process; c) Green Environmental Data; d) Learning Outcome; and e) Adaption to Scenario. In this study, green environmental data are used as real scientific data. In order to validate the identified components, semi-structured interviews were conducted with three experts from different backgrounds, which are education, environment, and computer science. They were interviewed based on their experiences and the scope of their works. The interview aimed to gain in-depth information from the experts about the reliability and suitability of the identified components and the underlying elements. The design of the interview protocol and instrument is presented in this paper, which consists of demographics and background, application and factors that influence the usage of S&V, application and factors that influence motivation level and process, usage of environmental data, and current scenarios using S&V technique. Then, the interview data were transcribed, coded and categorised based on the identified themes. The result of the analysis reveals 17 groups of elements which further been The literature into 58 sub-elements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdullah, S. I. S. S., Halim, L., & Shahali, E. H. M. (2011). Integration of environmental knowledge across biology, physics and chemistry subject at secondary school level in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1024–1028.
Açişli, S., Yalçin, S. A., & Turgut, Ü. (2011). Effects of the 5E learning model on students’ academic achievements in movement and force issues. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2459–2462.
Akkoyun, O. (May 2017). New simulation tool for teaching-learning processes in engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(3), 404–410.
Bahrum, S., Wahid, N., & Ibrahim, N. (2017). Integration of STEM education in Malaysia and why to STEAM. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 645–654.
R. Bilbokaite, “Effect of Computer Based Visualization On Motivation Of The Learning Processes,” in Proceedings of EDULEARN16 Conference, 2016, no. July.
R. A. Burkhard, “Towards a Framework and a Model for Knowledge Visualization : Synergies Between Information and Knowledge Visualization 1 Introduction : Knowledge Visualization in Organizations,” pp. 238–239, 2005.
Caglar, F., Shekhar, S., Gokhale, A., Basu, S., Rafi, T., Kinnebrew, J., & Biswas, G. (Nov. 2015). Cloud-hosted simulation-as-a-service for high school STEM education. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 58(2015), 255–273.
Cai, S., Wang, X., & Chiang, F. (2014). Computers in human behavior a case study of augmented reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 31–40.
Cantrell, P., Pekcan, G., Itani, A., & Velasquez-Bryant, N. (Oct. 2006). The effects of engineering modules on student learning in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 301–309.
Chi, H., & Jain, H. (2011). Teaching computing to STEM students via visualization tools. Procedia Comput. Sci., 4(2), 1937–1943.
Dawley, L., & Dede, C. (2014). Situated learning in virtual worlds and immersive simulations. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 723–734). New York, NY: Springer New York.
S. de Smale, T. Overmans, J. Jeuring, and L. van de Grint, “The Effect of Simulations and Games on Learning Objectives in Tertiary Education: A Systematic Review,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 9599, no. June, 2016, pp. 506–516.
Sazrol Fadzli, Jamaiah Yahaya, Aziz Deraman, Abdul Razak Hamdan, Lilia Halim, Noor Zaitun Yahaya, Izhar Abadi Ibrahim Rais Green environment data modelling and visualisation to enhance motivation of STEM education: a conceptual model. Proceedings of the VIIS18- 4th Visual Informatics International Seminar 2018, Nov 2018, UKM Bangi.
L. R. Gary, G. E. Mills, and P. W. Airasian, Educational Research: Competencies For Analysis and Applications, 10th ed., no. c. Pearson Education, Inc. All, 2012.
Göksu, I., Özcan, K. V., Çakir, R., & Göktas, Y. (2017). Content analysis of research trends in instructional design models: 1999-2014. Journal of Learning Design, 10(2), 85–109.
Greca, I. M., Seoane, E., & Arriassecq, I. (2014). Epistemological issues concerning computer simulations in science and their implications for science education. Science Education, 23(4), 897–921.
J. Hidalgo-Céspedes, G. Marín-Raventós, and V. Lara-Villagrán, “Learning Principles In Program Visualizations: A Systematic Literature Review,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, vol. 2016-Novem, 2016.
Huang, B., Xiong, D., & Li, H. (2004). An integrated approach to real-time environmental simulation and visualization. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 3(1), 42–50.
L. J. Hung, F. Aliah, P. Abdullah, M. Abd, and H. Bunyamin, “Aplikasi Konsep Fizik Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Yang Berasaskan STEM Bagi Pelajar Tingkatan Enam Atas,” 2nd Int. Semin. Qual. Afford. Educ., no. Isqae, pp. 470–481, 2013.
ISO 14004, ISO 14004. (2016). Environmental management systems — General guidelines on implementation (Vol. 2016, 3rd ed.pp. 1–59).
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Panduan Pelaksanaan Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (STEM) Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Guide for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in Teaching and Learning. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 2016.
Kneebone, R. (2005). Evaluating clinical simulations for learning. Academic Medicine, 80(6), 549–553.
M. Lasiun, “Keberkesanan Kaedah Visualisasi: Meningkatkan Keupayaan Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematik Berayat,” Proc. ICECRS, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 687–698, Jan. 2016.
W. Lee and A. Pachmayer, “The impact of visualization and expectation on tourists ’ emotion and satisfaction at the destination,” 2016.
Liaw, S. Y., Scherpbier, A., Rethans, J. J., & Klainin-Yobas, P. (2012). Assessment for simulation learning outcomes: A comparison of knowledge and self-reported confidence with observed clinical performance. Nurse Education Today, 32(6), e35–e39.
Lioce, L., Reed, C. C., Lemon, D., King, M. A., Martinez, P. A., Franklin, A. E., Boese, T., Decker, S., Sando, C. R., Gloe, D., Meakim, C., & Borum, J. C. (2013). Standards of best practice: Simulation standard III: Participant objectives. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(6 SUPPL), S15–S18.
S. Liu, W. Cui, Y. Wu, and M. Liu, (Dec. 2014). “A survey on information visualization: Recent advances and challenges,” The Visual Computer, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1373–1393. Accessed 29 Mar 2019.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2015). Executive Summary Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015–2025 (Higher Education). Minist. Educ. Malaysia, 2025, 40.
National Research Council. (2011). Learning Science Through Computer Games and Simulations. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
D. A. Nazaruddin, H. E. Mansor, and M. M. A. Khan, (2017). “Some unique and imaginative geological features (Mimetoliths) in selected limestone sites in malaysia: Study on their formational processes and geotourism potentials,” Bulletin Geological Society of Malaysia, vol. 64, no. December, pp. 17–25.
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Toolkit, “POPs Toolkit Glossary,” 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.popstoolkit.com/_glossary.aspx. Accessed 29 Mar 2019.
B. Piga and E. Morello, “Environmental design studies on perception and simulation: an urban design approach,” Ambiances, no. 1, Jun. 2015.
Rosenzweig, E. Q., & Wigfield, A. (Apr. 2016). STEM motivation interventions for adolescents: A promising start, but further to go. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 146–163.
Rowley, J. (Mar. 2012). Conducting research interviews. Management Research Review, 35(3/4), 260–271.
Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers in Education, 58(1), 136–153.
Sattar, M., Rasul, M. S., & Halim, L. (2016). The Eurasia proceedings of educational & social sciences (EPESS) the Eurasia proceedings of educational USING STEM INTEGRATED APPROACH TO NURTURE STUDENTS’ INTEREST AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS. Social Science, 4, 313–319. Retrieved from http://www.isres.org.
Shahali, E. H. M., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Zulkifeli, M. A. (2017). STEM learning through engineering design: Impact on middle secondary students’ interest towards STEM. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1189–1211.
A. Śliwińska-Wyrzychowska et al., “Restored limestone quarry as an attractive place for educational purposes and refuge of biodiversity,” 2015.
Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (Jun. 2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337–1370.
Srisawasdi, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2015). Exploring effectiveness of simulation-based inquiry learning in science with integration of formative assessment. J. Comput. Educ., 2(3), 323–352.
Standridge, C. R. (1985). Performing simulation projects with the extended simulation system (TESS). Simulation, 45(6), 283–291.
M. Tezer and M. Cumhur, “Mathematics through the 5E instructional model and mathematical modelling: The geometrical objects,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 4789–4804, Jul. 2017.
The Institute of Quarrying, “What is Quarrying?,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.quarrying.org/about-quarrying/quarrying-explained.
M. J. Urban and D. A. Falvo, Improving K-12 STEM education outcomes through technological integration. 2016.
D. Vlachopoulos and A. Makri, “The effect of games and simulations on higher education: a systematic literature review,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 22, Dec. 2017.
Watson, K., Aubusson, P., Steel, F., & Griffin, J. (1997). A culture of learning in the informal museum setting? Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 9(1), 125–138.
Yahaya, J. H., et al. (2016). Environmental quarry system based on integrated digital objects: The conceptual model. Advanced Science Letters, 22(8), 1914–1918.
Jamaiah H. Yahaya, Aziz Deraman, Abdul Razak Hamdan, Noor Zaitun Yahaya, Izhar Abadi Ibrahim Rais & Mohamed Shahrir Mohamed Zahari. 2017. The computational model for environment quality measurement, IEEE computing conference 2017, 18-20 July 2017, London UK, pp. 947–952.
Zelaya-Floyd, M. I. (2017). Exploring the role of simulation and visualization tools in improving learning outcomes in support of technology programs. Clemson University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fadzli, S., Yahaya, J., Deraman, A. et al. Environment based virtual interaction to enhance motivation of STEM education: The qualitative interview design and analysis. Educ Inf Technol 25, 775–790 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09996-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09996-y