Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of blended learning on the achievement of HDE students in the methods of teaching Arabic language course and their attitudes towards its use at Ajman University: A case study

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The UAE Ministry of Education strives to use modern technological and educational methods to teach students in higher education institutions and to assure high-quality education. This study aims to investigate the effects of the use of blended learning on the achievements of students in a higher diploma in education (HDE) course at Ajman University. It compares the results of different ways of teaching the ‘Methods of Teaching the Arabic Language course’, and students’ attitudes towards their use. The study was conducted using a quasi-experimental design case study. The participants of the study were 94 students, divided into two groups of equal sizes (n = 47): one an experimental group and the other a control group. An achievement test and questionnaire were designed to confirm the study’s validity and reliability. SPSS was used to analyze the data. The findings revealed that there were statistically significant differences between the experimental and the control groups, in favor of the experimental group teaching method and students of this experimental group have attitudes have positive towards the using of blended learning. Their attitudes were in favor of the students with academic evaluation (GPA 3.5–4), Computer skills (Students with excellent computer skills) and finally, there was no statistical significance according to teaching experience. The study recommends further research into using blended learning in higher education institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aborisade, P. A. (2013). Blended learning in English for academic purposes courses: A Nigerian case study. In B. Tomlinson & C. Whittaker (Eds.), Blended learning in English language teaching: Course design and implementation. UK: London British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acat, B., & Dönmez, İ. (2009). To compare student centered education and teacher centered education in primary science and technology lesson in terms of learning environments. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1.

  • Adair-Hauck, B., Willingham-McLain, L., & Earnest Youngs, B. (1999). Evaluating the integration of technology and second language learning. CALICO Journal, 17(2), 269–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adas, D., & Ayda, B. (2013). Writing difficulties and new solutions: Blended learning as an approach to improve writing abilities. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(9), 254–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, M. (2011). The impact of the use of blended learning in the teaching of chemistry on achievement and guidance towards it and the survival of the impact of learning among secondary students. Journal of Scientific Education, 14(3), 173–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzan, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Chicago: The Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akbarov, A., Gonen, K., & Aydogan, H. (2018). Students’ attitudes toward blended learning in EFL context. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 11(1), 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. (2008). A study of student’s perceptions in a blended learning environment based on different learning styles. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 183–193. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/708e/ a13e965a1efeaac8b462e564afaa010d500b.pdf.

  • AlAbdulkarim, L., & Albarrak, A. (2015). Students’ attitudes and satisfaction towards blended learning in health sciences. In Proceedings of ADVED15 International Conference on Advances in Education and Social Sciences, 12–14 October 2015. Istanbul: Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algahtani, A. F. (2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of the e-learning experience in some universities in Saudi Arabia from male students’ perceptions. Thesis: Durham University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hasan, I. (2013). The effectiveness of using the blended learning on the academic achievement in the biology course among the second graders in the private secondary schools in um Aldurman and their trends towards it. Psychological and Educational Research Journal, (36), 59–85.

  • Ali, A. (2012). Effectiveness of a program based on blended learning in the development of achievement and innovative thinking in mathematics for the seventh-grade pupils of the basic education in the Republic of Yemen. Retrieved from: http://srv3.eulc.edu.eg/eulc_v5/libraries/start.aspx

  • Allan, J., & Lawless, N. (2005). Learning through online collaboration by SME staff. Education and Training, 47(8–9), 653–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almasaeid, T. (2014). The effect of using blended learning strategy on achievement and attitudes in teaching science among 9th grade students. European Scientific Journal November, 10(31), 1857–7881.

    Google Scholar 

  • AlQahtani, A. (2015). Effect of traditional, blended, e-learning on student’ attitudes in a course on Islamic culture. International conference on education and social sciences, 2-4 February, Turkey.

  • Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2016). The role of e-learning, the advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(12), 397–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakeer, A. (2018). Students’ attitudes towards implementing blended learning in teaching English in higher education institutions: A case of Al-Quds Open University. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 8(6), 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banados, E. (2006). A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through an online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO Journal, V(23), 3 533–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersin & Associates (2003). Blended learning: What works(tm). An industry study of the strategy, implementation, and impact of blended learning in corporate applications. Bersin & Associates.

  • Bonk, C., & Graham, C. (2006). The blended learning handbook: Global perspectives and local design. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, K., & Seaman, J. (2005). Sloan-C special survey report; a look at blended learning. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R., & Pickard, P. (2003). Using blended learning to improve student success rates in learning to program. Journal of Educational Media, 28, 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: the case for constructivist classrooms, with a new introduction by the authors. Alexandria: Association for supervision & curriculum development.

  • Cai, H. (2012). E-learning and English teaching. IERI Procedia, 2(2012), 841–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., & Jones, K. (2007). Blended learning vs. traditional classroom settings: Assessing effectiveness and students’ perceptions in an MBA accounting course. The Journal of Educators Online, 4(1).

  • Christo-Baker, E. (2004). College and university faculty attitude, incivilities and barriers towards distance education. Unpublished PhD thesis, Bowling Green State University.

  • Chung, H. (2013). A case study on the effects of an L2 writing instructional model for blended learning in higher education. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science instruction. San Francisco: Preiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diasa, S., & Diniza, A. (2012). Blended learning in higher education: Different needs, different profiles. Procedia Computer Science, 14, 438–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, C., Godfrey, J. M., & Gyles, N. (2003). Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting students’ learning outcomes? Accounting Education, 12(4), 373–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, C. (2011). A comparison of traditional and blended learning in introductory principles of accounting course. American Journal of Business Education, 4(9), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-ebiary, Y., Al-sammarraie, N., Alimusleh, E., & Salem. (2016). The impact of E-learning teaching the Arabic language for non-native speakers. International Journal of Latest Engineering and Management Research (IJLEMR), V1(10), 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. R., Steed, F. A., & Applebee, C. A. (2006). Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and associations with approaches to design. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 312–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emaliana, I. (2017). Teacher-centered or student-centered learning approach to promote learning? Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, V10(2), 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eydelman, N. (2013). A blended English as a foreign language academic writing course. In B. T. C. Whittaker (Ed.), Blended learning in English language teaching: Course design and implementation. UK: London British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, K. (2000). Forum focus and overview, the business of E-learning: Bringing your organization in the knowledge economy. Sydney: Telcam Group, University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C.R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In: Bonk, C. J. and Graham, C. R., Eds., Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, Local designs, Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco, 3–21.

  • Graham, C. R. (2009). Blended learning models. In Encyclopedia of information science and technology (2nd ed.). USA: Brigham Young University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2003). Blended learning environments: A review of the research literature. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3115/ 9c8043330064c735bbd9776dff822a3c8782.pdf

  • Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2005). Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (pp. 253–259). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güzer, B., & Caner. (2014). The past, present and future of blended learning: An in-depth analysis of literature. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4596–4603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardan, A. (2013). Language learning strategies: A general overview. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences. Volume, 106, 1712–1726 Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813048179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, I. (2010). Blended learning. E-Learning Magazine, 5, 11 Al-Mansoura University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkhouse, H. (2013). Investigating Blended Learning in the High School Science Classroom. Electronic theses and dissertations. 75. University of Northern Iowa. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/75.

  • Hyder, I., & Bhamani, S. (2018). Bloom’s taxonomy (cognitive domain) in higher education settings: Reflection brief. Journal of Education and Educational Development., 3(2), 288–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyum, C., & So, L. (2013). A case study on the effects of an L2 writing instructional model for blended learning in higher education. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ja’ashan, M. (2015). Perceptions and attitudes towards blended learning for English courses: A case study of students at University of Bisha. English Language Teaching, 8(9), 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. (2012). Three new teaching methods improve the education process. Retrieved from http://gettingsmart.com/2012/09/categories/edtech.

  • Jin, S. h. (2014). Implementation of smart-phone-based blended learning in EFL undergraduate grammar course. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 17(4), 11–37.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Achmadi, D., Green, V. A., O’Reilly, M. F., Mulloy, A., et al. (2010). Behavioral intervention promotes successful use of an iPod1-based communication device by an adolescent with autism. Clinical Case Studies, 9, 328–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazu, I., & Demirkol, M. (2014). Effect of blended learning environment on high school students’ academic achievement. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 78–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keshta, A. S., & Harb, I.I. (2013). The effectiveness of a blended learning program on developing Palestinian tenth graders' English writing skills. Education Journal, 2(6): 208–221.

  • Khader, N. (2016). The effectiveness of blended learning in improving students’ achievement in third grade’s science in Bani Kenana. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(35), 109–116 Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1126508.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. I., Shaik, M. S., Ali, A. M., & Bebi, C. V. (2012). Study of blended learning process in education context. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS), 4(9), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Kim, E. J. (2010). The development of online-integrated college English curriculum for enhancing speaking performance. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 13(3), 197–214.

  • Klein, D., & Ware, M. (2003). E-learning: New opportunities in continuing professional development. Learned Publishing, 16(1), 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudryashovala, V., Gorbatova, N., & Rozhkova, E. (2016). Developing a blended learning based model for teaching foreign languages in engineering institutions. SHS Web of Conferences, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162801128.

  • Lee, O., & Im, Y. (2014). Innovation of higher education in the globalized era—Emerging trends report 2013–2014. In R. H. Kinshuk & J. K. Price (Eds.), ICT in education in global context (pp. 221–247). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43927-2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leithner, A. (2009). Review of blended learning: Using technology in and beyond the language classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2009). Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 282–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoun, H. (2016). The effect of using blended learning on the achievement of students and information retention of fifth graders in the biology course. Journal of Faculty of Education, 22(95), 209–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marc, J. R. (2002). Book review: E-learning strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Dall'Alba, G., & Tse, L. K. (1996). Memorizing and understanding: The keys to the paradox? In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 69–83). Hong Kong: Comparative education research Centre and the Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSporran, M. & King, C. (2005). Blended is better: Choosing educational delivery methods. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.114.1257&rep =rep1&type=pdf.

  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US. Department of Education.

  • Mohammadia, N., Ghorbanib, V., & Hamidiab, F. (2011). Effects of e-learning on language learning. Procedia Computer Science, 3(2011), 464–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullamaa, K. (2010). ICT in language learning – Benefits and methodological implications. International Education Studies, 3(1), 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, T. S., & Bindu, R. L. (2016). Effect of blended learning strategy on achievement in biology and social and environmental attitude of students at secondary level. Journal on School Educational Technology, 11(4), 39–52 (EJ1131827).

    Google Scholar 

  • Navidinia, H., Zare Bidaki, M., & Hekmati, N. (2016). Incorporating E-learning in teaching English language to medical students: Exploring its potential contributions. Medical Journal of Islamic Republic of Iran, 30, 462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, M. (2003). A theory for e-learning. Educational Technology and Society, 6(2), 1–10 Official portal of the UAE, 2018, from https://government.ae/en/information-andservices/education/elearning-mlearning-and-distant-learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okaz, A. (2015). Integrating blended learning in higher education. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 600–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oye, N. D., Salleh, M., & Iahad, N. A. (2010). Holistic E-learning in Nigerian higher education institutions. Journal of Computing, 2(11), 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palak, D., Walls, T., & R. (2009). Teachers’ belief and technology practices: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 417–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo-Gonzalez, J. (2013). Incorporating blended learning in an undergraduate English course in Colombia. In B. Tomlinson & C. Whittaker (Eds.), Blended learning in English language teaching: Course design and implementation. London: British Council, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy, A.G. (2009). Finding the perfect blend: A comparative study of online, face-to-face, and blended instruction. University of North Texas. ProQuest dissertations and theses. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/304963133?accountid% 20=4488.%20(304963133)

  • Pereira, J., Pleguezuelos, E., Meri, A., Molina-Ros, A., Molina-Tomas, M. C., & Masdeu, C. (2007). Effectiveness of using blended learning strategies for teaching and learning human anatomy. Medical Education, 41, 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qindah, S. (2018). The effects of blended learning on EFL students’ usage of grammar in context. Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), V(10), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., Bacigalupo, M., Ferrari, A., Punie, Y. (2009). Learning 2.0: The impact of web 2.0 innovations on education and training in Europe. Retrieved from: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC55629/jrc55629.pdf

  • Roffe, I. (2002). E-learning: Engagement, enhancement and execution. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(1), 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, J. E. (2003). Blending learning opportunities to enhance educational programming and meetings. Association Management, 55(5), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseth, C., Akcaoglu, M., & Zellner, A. (2013). Blending synchronous face-to-face and computer supported cooperative learning in a hybrid doctoral seminar. Techtrends, 57(3), 54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Şahin-Kızıl, A. (2014). Blended instruction for EFL learners: Engagement, learning and course satisfaction. Jalt Call Journal, 10(3), 175–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook, S. (2003). E-learning in SMALL organizations. Education and Training, 45(8–9), 506–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (2002). Designing world class e-learning (1st ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellings, G. (2011). Applying learning strategy questionnaires: Problems and possibilities. Metacognition Learning, 6, 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekhon, M., & Hartley, D. (2014). Basics of e-learning revisited. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training & Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serveau, K. (2004). Examining an online corporate study group. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 940–945). AACE Chesapeake.

  • Shahin, S. (2008). The effect of blended learning on achievement and the development of science operations among the students of the elementary level and their trends towards it. Journal of Faculty of Education, 1(38), 105–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., & Barrett, B. (2007). Blended learning: Using technology in and beyond the language classroom. Oxford: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Issue of Educational Technology, 43(6), 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, H., & Reed, C. (2001). A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. Los Angeles: Centra Software Retrieved from: https://maken.wikiwijs.nl/bestanden/186031/ blend-ce.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staker, H., & Horn, M. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. San Mateo: Innosight Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapa, M., Ibrahim, M., & Yusoff, A. (2015). Engaging vocational college students through blended learning: Improving class attendance and participation. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sucaromana, U. (2013). The effect of blended learning on the intrinsic motivation of Thai EFL students. English Language Teaching, 6(5), 141–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susan, P., & Chris, S. (2015). Maximising competency: Education and blended learning. New York: Incol Competency Works.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. C. (1995). Distance education technologies: The fourth generation. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ ajet/ajet11/Taylor.Html.

  • Thorne, K. (2003). Blended Learning : How to Integrate. London: Kogan.

  • Tosun, S. (2015). The effects of blended learning on EFL students’ vocabulary enhancement. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 641–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsou, W., Wang, W., & Li, H. (2002). How computers facilitate English foreign language learners acquire English abstract words. Computers & Education, 39(4), 415–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valiathan. P, (2002). Blended learning models. Retrieved from: http://www.purnima-valiathan.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Blended-Learning-Models-2002-ASTD.pdf

  • Vernadakis, N., Giannousi, M., Derri, V., Michalopoulos, M., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2012). The impact of blended and traditional instruction in students’ performance. Procedia Technology, 1, 439–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Yang, Y., & Wen, X. (2009). Study on blended learning approach for English teaching. In Paper presented at the IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics (SMC), 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, P. D., & Warschauer, M. (2006). Electronic feedback and second language writing. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 105–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y., Shi, Y., Yang, H., & Liu, J. (2017). Blended learning versus traditional learning: A study of students’ learning achievements and academic press. International Symposium on Educational Technology, 2019, 223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, R. H., Griggs, K. A., & Downing, T. (2002). A framework for e-learning as a tool for knowledge management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(7), 371–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zandberg, I., & Lewis, L. (2008). Technology-based distance education courses for public elementary and secondary school students: 2002–03 and 2004–05. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohrabi, M., Torabi, M. A., & Baybourdiani, P. (2012). Teacher-centered and/or student-centered learning: English language in Iran. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(3).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors’ would like to thank Ajman University for their cooperative and the dean of scientific research for his guidance and mentorship.

Availability of data and materials

We would have loved to share the data however, the data is primary in nature and the authors do not wish to share the data as this may breach participant confidentiality.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. (There is no funding for this paper.)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Humanities and Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, UAE

    Sami Al-Qatawneh, Mohd. Elmagzoub Eltahir & Najeh Rajeh Alsalhi

Authors
  1. Sami Al-Qatawneh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohd. Elmagzoub Eltahir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Najeh Rajeh Alsalhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors were involved in research design, implementation of the study, data gathering, data analysis, and writing of the manuscript. All authors approve submission of the manuscript for publication consideration. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Najeh Rajeh Alsalhi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

As authors, we declare that have no significant financial, professional or personal interests that may affect the performance or presentation of the work described in this manuscript. (The authors declare that they have no competing interests).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Qatawneh, S., Eltahir, M.E. & Alsalhi, N.R. The effect of blended learning on the achievement of HDE students in the methods of teaching Arabic language course and their attitudes towards its use at Ajman University: A case study. Educ Inf Technol 25, 2101–2127 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10046-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10046-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation