Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of heutagogy approach in M-learning for sustainability education

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lifelong education is increasingly popular among Malaysians in accordance with the formation of a stable economy. The need for education is no longer limited, and this education has given equal opportunities to all citizens, especially to the working class. Therefore, this study is to identify the elements of need that the educational student needs throughout the development of m-learning for lifelong education. A total of 11 experts were selected to analyze the fuzziness consensus of experts. All of the data obtained will be analyzed using the Fuzzy Delphi method. The findings show that smartphones are the most appropriate devices in helping students with thorough education and the smartphones sit at the first position as compared to tablet PC and laptop devices. Whereas, the six heutagogy elements that explore, create, connect, share, reflect, and collaborate have reached unity with the threshold value of d ≤ 0.2 and the percentage of the expert group is more than 75%. However, the sharing elements have the highest position in the development of modules for lifelong education. Therefore, based on the consensus agreements, the development of modules for these lifelong educational students should be incorporated with the elements of heutagogy according to the position in the expert consensus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, M., & Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agonacs, N. & Matos, J. F. (2017). Towards a Heutagogy-based MOOC design framework. Proceedings of EMOOCs 2017: Work in Progress Papers of the Experience and Research Tracks and Position Papers of the Policy Track, 47-52.

  • Ally, M., & Prieto-Blázquez, J. (2014). What is the future of mobile learning in education? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 11(1), 142–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azizah, & Chan. (2009). Design and development of multimedia educational sexuality course. Malaysia Education Journal, 34(2), 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 56–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke, L. M. (2014). Using social media to engage and develop online learners in self- determined learning. Research in Learning Technology. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.21635.

  • Blaschke, L. M. (2017). Self-determined learning (heutagogy) and digital media: Creating integrated educational environments for developing lifelong learning skills. In D. Kergel, B. Heidkamp, P. Telléus, T. Rachwal, & S. Nowakowski (Eds.), The digital turn in higher education. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke, L. M. (2018). Self-determined learning (Heutagogy) and digital media creating integrated educational environments for developing lifelong learning skills. In D. Kergel, B. Heidkamp, P. Telléus, T. Rachwal, & S. Nowakowski (Eds.), The digital turn in higher education. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2015). Heutagogy, technology, and lifelong learning for professional and part-time learners. In A. Dailey-Hebert & K. Dennis (Eds.), Transformative perspectives and processes in higher education (pp. 75–94). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, S. L., Edmondson, D. R., Artis, A. B., & Fleming, D. (2014). Self-directed learning: A tool for lifelong learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 36(1), 20–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canning, N. (2010). Playing with heutagogy: Exploring strategies to empower mature learners in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(1), 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C. H., & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 2002, 142(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00280-6.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Embi, A., Hussin, S., & Panah, E. (2014). Flipped learning readiness among graduate and postgraduate students in UKM. In Embi, A (Ed.), Blended & Flipped Learning: Case studies in Malaysian HEIs (pp. 209–222). Kuala Lumpur: Centre for Teaching Technologies Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia & Department of Higher Education Ministry of Education Malaysia.

  • Gregory, S., Bannister-Tyrrell, M., Charteris, J., & Nye, A. (2018). Heutagogy in postgraduate education: Cognitive advantages for higher degree online students. In F. Padró, R. Erwee, M. Harmes, M. Harmes, & P. Danaher (Eds.), Postgraduate education in higher education (pp. 189–209). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halili, H. (2019). Technological advancements in education 4.0. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 7(1), 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamid, T. A., Zakaria, N. S., Rahim, N. A. A., Chai, S. T., & Akahbar, S. A. N. (2019). Moving the needle on the University of Third age in Malaysia: Recent developments and prospects. In M. Formosa (Ed.), The University of the Third age and Active Ageing. International perspectives on aging (Vol. 23, pp. 195–206). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasami, H., & Buang, N. A. (2018). Lifelong learning programme effectiveness towards knowledge and community college student’s skill level (Keberkesanan program pembelajaran sepanjang hayat (PSH) terhadap pengetahuan dan tahap kemahiran pelajar kolej komuniti). Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 43(3), 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hase, S. and Kenyon, C. (2000) From andragogy to heutagogy. Ulti-BASE In-Site. http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/New/newdec99.html.

  • Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., & Mieno, H. (1993). The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55(3), 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil, R. M., Siraj, S., Yusof, F., Noh, M. N., Hussin, Z., & Sapar, A. A. (2015). Application of Fuzzy Delphi technique to entrepreneurship element requirement for Malaysian polytechnic engineering lecturer (Aplikasi Teknik Fuzzy Delphi Terhadap Keperluan Elemen Keusahawanan Bagi Pensyarah Kejuruteraan Politeknik Malaysia). International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship., 5(1), 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H., & Twiss, B. L. (1978). Forecasting technology for planning decisions. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardaras, D. K., Karakostas, B., & Mamakou, X. J. (2013). Content presentation personalisation and media adaptation in tourism web sites using fuzzy Delphi method and fuzzy cognitive maps. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(6), 2331–2342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, Z. B., & Ahmad, A. R. (2010). E-learning: The evolution of the internet in lifelong learning (E-Pembelajaran: Evolusi internet Dalam Pembelajaran Sepanjang Hayat). Proceedings of regional conference on knowledge integration in ICT (Vol. 210), pp. 209-218.

  • Low, L., & O’Connell, M. (2006). Learner-centric design of digital mobile learning. Proceedings of the OLT Conference, pp. 71-82.

  • Marta-Lazo, C., Frau-Meigs, D., & Osuna-Acedo, S. (2019). Collaborative lifelong learning and professional transfer. Case study: ECO European Project. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(1), 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, L., & Stoszkowski, J. R. (2018). A heutagogical approach to coach education: What worked for one particular learner, how and why. Journal of Qualitative Research in Sports Studies, 12(1), 317–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2015). Malaysian education blueprint 2015–2025 (higher education). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelson, L. S., Berg, W., Fox, B., Grandbouche, P., Harris, M., Kroschel, T. L., & Sandoval, S. (2017). Snap, tweet, and post: College student social media perceptions and Heutagogic practices and uses. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(4), 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naqvi, T. F., & Parvez, M. J. (2019). Considering heutagogy as an innovative approach for skill development. Socialsci Journal, 3, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norlidah, A., DeWitt, D., & Siraj, S. (2013). Development of science pedagogical module based on learning styles and technology. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugraheni, E. (2009). Open and long-distance education role in improving force seek higher education in Southeast Asia (Peranan pendidikan terbuka dan jarak jauh dalam meningkatkan daya jangkau pendidikan tinggi di Asia Tenggara). Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh, 10(1), 1–9.

  • O'Brien, E., Hamburg, I., & Southern, M. (2019). Using technology-oriented, problem-based learning to support global workplace learning. In V. H. Kenon & S. V. Palsole (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of global workplace learning (pp. 591–609). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(2), 78–102.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pouezevara, S., Mekhael, S., & Darcy, N. (2014). Planning and evaluating ICT in education programs using the four dimensions of sustainability: A program evaluation from Egypt. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 10(2), 120–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tee, Y. Q., Mohamed, A., & Alias, N. (2014). Application of fuzzy Delphi method in exploring Facebook as a tool for writing therapy among young adults. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2005). Towards knowledge societies: UNESCO world report. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2015). Education for all 2015 national review report: Zimbabwe. The report has been tabled in the world education forum, Incheon, Republic of Korea 19-22 May 2015.

  • UNESCO. (2017). Conference report: Third international conference on learning cities (ICLC). Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2015). Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. http//:sustainabledevelopment.un.org

  • Vázquez-Cano, E. (2014). Mobile distance learning with smartphones and apps in higher education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(4), 1505–1520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoruzu, R. (2017). Lifelong learning in transformation: Promising practices in Southeast Asia. Hamburg: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nurul Aisyah Kamrozzaman.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamrozzaman, N.A., Badusah, J. & Ruzanna, W.M. Development of heutagogy approach in M-learning for sustainability education. Educ Inf Technol 25, 3035–3047 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10101-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10101-x

Keywords

Navigation